The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Pregnant Women: Beware of COVID Shots
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

(Related: Brooklyn Woman Fired From Job After Not Getting Vaccine Because She Wanted to Wait For More Data on Pregnancy Effects)

Twenty years ago, when I was pregnant with my first child, I transformed into a total health nut. A lifelong couch potato, I started exercising, enrolled in Lamaze classes and even took vitamins for the first time. I halted my consumption of caffeine, Doritos, Spam and sushi. After decades of obliviousness to food labels, I began scrutinizing every additive and preservative listed in the teeny-tiny font on each item of my grocery list.

Now, imagine if our culture encouraged women of childbearing age to be as vigilant about the effects of Big Pharma’s experimental drugs on themselves and their unborn babies as they are about our diets. We know all about gluten and carbs, trans-fats and Omega-3 fatty acids, mercury in fish and heavy metals in baby food. But do you know what’s in the COVID-19 vaccines that an estimated 100 million Americans are expected to inject into their bodies by this spring?

In December, I flagged concerns raised by Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientific officer at Pfizer Global, regarding two additives in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine: polyethylene glycol and mNeonGreen. Yeadon and his colleagues warned of potential fertility-specific risks involving antibodies against “spike proteins” that could disrupt the development of placenta in vaccinated women. It is “unclear,” they warned, “what if any instructions/information” that clinical trial subjects received regarding those risks.

Bear in mind that none of the clinical trials conducted by the vaccine-makers to win emergency use authorization from the federal government included pregnant women. That has been historically true of drug trials because, as Dr. Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors explained to me in an interview last week, the “cascade of events that has to go one in the human body to get pregnant and maintain a pregnancy is incredibly complicated” and “we don’t know all the details of what we don’t know.” Gold called it “shocking” that medical professionals and pregnant women or women of childbearing age “would be advocating” taking “anything experimental.” [WATCH FULL INTERVIEW HERE.]

Yes, let’s be clear and accurate in our description of the COVID-19 vaccines. They are wholly experimental treatments manufactured and marketed by multinational corporations that are immune from liability for their products being tested, approved and distributed at warp speed. An important white paper by America’s Frontline Doctors reminds citizens that COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca are considered “investigational” in status and fall under legal standards for experimental medications. The trials are ongoing and enrollees are tracked for at least the next two years. “We do not know the effect on the pregnant or soon to be pregnant,” Gold and her colleagues report. “There is no actual data at all for an enormous percentage of the population, probably more than half.”

ORDER IT NOW

On top of all that uncertainty and lack of data, the “mechanism of action of the experimental mRNA vaccines includes a possible auto-immune rejection of the placenta. In layman’s terms, the vaccine may permanently interfere with a woman’s ability to maintain a pregnancy.” In fact, as the labeling on COVID-19 vaccine vials itself acknowledges: “(I)t is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA VaccineBNT162b2 has an impact on fertility. And women of childbearing age are advised to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.”

Nevertheless, Dr. Anthony Fauci is now downplaying the risks of COVID-19 jab complications in pregnant women and claims there are “no red flags,” while the World Health Organization has warned that “very little data are available to assess vaccine safety in pregnancy.”

Let me give you the bottom line on the “expert” consensus about whether the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for pregnant women: They just don’t know. Yet, those who dare dissent from Big Pharma orthodoxy have been branded “conspiracy theorists” and are being pushed off social media. Merely noting that the experts don’t know what they don’t know is smeared as “misinformation” or “disinformation.” (You may remember I first warned you about this global censorship of vaccine dissidents in March 2019.)

The National Vaccine Information Center’s VAERS database tracker has identified 23 cases involving COVID-19 vaccines and reported miscarriages, fetal death, premature delivery or stillbirth. The background miscarriage rate is about 10-15%, so you would expect some miscarriages to happen regardless of the vaccine. But extreme caution is still advised. Alex Berenson, former New York Times reporter and COVID-19 watchdog, asks: “Where’s the safety data?” He reports that animal studies on COVID jabs have shown “much higher rates of lost fetuses” — and to date, the only such trials have been conducted on pregnant rats.

In the meantime, federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System data on human COVID-19 vaccine recipients have disclosed “multiple cases of apparently healthy late-term fetuses lost days after vaccinations,” Berenson adds. “Healthy pregnant women are at next to no risk from #Covid; why on earth would anyone try to shame them into getting this vaccine?”

For moms and moms-to-be, we must always follow the oath that so many COVID Inc. experts have abandoned: First, do no harm.

Michelle Malkin’s email address is MichelleMalkinInvestigates@protonmail.com. To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

 
Hide 18 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. It’s the beginning of (((their))) grand culling.

    This is a very good video on Gates which has resurfaced – https://thedailycoin.org/2021/01/05/a-deleted-bill-gates-documentary-has-been-revived-video/

    Zuckerberg caught by Veritas: “I share some caution on this [vaccine] because we don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

  2. [Dr.]Berenson adds. “Healthy pregnant women are at next to no risk from #Covid; why on earth would anyone try to shame them into getting this vaccine?”

    That gets to the gist of the issue. There’s a very low risk for a young expecting mother to end up hospitalized, much less dead, from the COVID-19. There’s some risk of miscarriage, not yet even known, from these vaccines. I think a pregnant woman could make her own decision on that. “Woman’s choice!” (What happened to that?)

    Decisions like these, that ought to be personal, are going to be made by “experts” in government and by legislation and executive fiat in the near future. The healthcare bureaucracy is expanding toward the level of the Security State (Motherland Security/TSA/etc)*, based on this Kung Flu PanicFest. One could be forgiven for thinking that this was somehow all planned out. Myself, I think all parties involved are too stupid for that to have been the case.

    .

    * See “COVID / TSA twin peaks of stupidity” on the Peak Stupidity blog.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Oops, my bad, I'd though Mr. Berenson was a doctor and inserted that. Nope, he's the former NY Times writer. I'd never have expected that from the common sense, but maybe that explains the "former".

  3. FaUci and WHO…that tells me all that I need to know. Drug companies(Big Pharma) immune from liability…all that I need to know. Wake up, America!

    • Replies: @goldgettin
    @Voice of reason

    Yes,you are correct.
    What we don't know is,
    how and why in the heaven is this happening?

    Replies: @Voice of reason

  4. @Achmed E. Newman

    [Dr.]Berenson adds. “Healthy pregnant women are at next to no risk from #Covid; why on earth would anyone try to shame them into getting this vaccine?”
     
    That gets to the gist of the issue. There's a very low risk for a young expecting mother to end up hospitalized, much less dead, from the COVID-19. There's some risk of miscarriage, not yet even known, from these vaccines. I think a pregnant woman could make her own decision on that. "Woman's choice!" (What happened to that?)

    Decisions like these, that ought to be personal, are going to be made by "experts" in government and by legislation and executive fiat in the near future. The healthcare bureaucracy is expanding toward the level of the Security State (Motherland Security/TSA/etc)*, based on this Kung Flu PanicFest. One could be forgiven for thinking that this was somehow all planned out. Myself, I think all parties involved are too stupid for that to have been the case.

    .

    * See "COVID / TSA twin peaks of stupidity" on the Peak Stupidity blog.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    Oops, my bad, I’d though Mr. Berenson was a doctor and inserted that. Nope, he’s the former NY Times writer. I’d never have expected that from the common sense, but maybe that explains the “former”.

  5. The protein in question is Syncytin-1, which is produced by an HERV (HERV-W) at the time of pregnancy. It is not produced (e.g. HERV-W is inactive) any other time. The purpose of this protein is to “prep” the immune system so that it does NOT reject the fertilized egg as “foreign” tissue. If the spike protein that the mRNA virus sensitized the immune system to is similar in structure and function to Syncytin-1 then, yes, these vaccines have the potential to sterilize women receiving them as the will possibly permanently sensitize the immune system to Syncytin-1.

    Oh, and the other good news? The ACE2 receptors that allow COVID-19 access to cells are most abundant in the testes (of men). This means that every COVID-19 infection, and likely the “traditional” vaccines (inactive protein or virus DNA), as the potential to sterilize men as well, possibly permanently.

    • Replies: @Stonewall Jackson
    @Abelard Lindsey

    A question... are there covid related issues for the testicles, like mumps? Does it cause swelling? Geez... that would just be wonderful with all the other issues if you got a bad dose of covid..

    Replies: @Abelard Lindsey

  6. There’s a certain pattern we see over and over. They won’t test for a certain effect, and when suspicions are raised, they tell us there is no data.
    The very fact they haven’t gathered data on covid vaccine and pregnancy tells me it is in fact dangerous.

    • Agree: Adam Smith
  7. @Voice of reason
    FaUci and WHO...that tells me all that I need to know. Drug companies(Big Pharma) immune from liability...all that I need to know. Wake up, America!

    Replies: @goldgettin

    Yes,you are correct.
    What we don’t know is,
    how and why in the heaven is this happening?

    • Replies: @Voice of reason
    @goldgettin

    It's called manipulation/control. The REAL pandemic is ignorance by those who would rather worry about what Donald tweeted about LeBron than actually educating themselves via individuals such as Michelle Malkin, who, for one, foretold of the fraud that occurred this past November well in advance with her investigative reporting on the ballot harvesting that 'coincidentally' was happening in the states that came into question, such as Wisconsin. Little, if any, compassion from me towards those who refuse to open their eyes or actually do some research/digging and just accept what FaUci, WHO, and their partners in crime, the mainstream media, feed them daily.

  8. I keep thinking of ‘Children of Men’.

  9. Pregnant Women: Beware of COVID Shots

    …and everyone else too.

  10. @Abelard Lindsey
    The protein in question is Syncytin-1, which is produced by an HERV (HERV-W) at the time of pregnancy. It is not produced (e.g. HERV-W is inactive) any other time. The purpose of this protein is to "prep" the immune system so that it does NOT reject the fertilized egg as "foreign" tissue. If the spike protein that the mRNA virus sensitized the immune system to is similar in structure and function to Syncytin-1 then, yes, these vaccines have the potential to sterilize women receiving them as the will possibly permanently sensitize the immune system to Syncytin-1.

    Oh, and the other good news? The ACE2 receptors that allow COVID-19 access to cells are most abundant in the testes (of men). This means that every COVID-19 infection, and likely the "traditional" vaccines (inactive protein or virus DNA), as the potential to sterilize men as well, possibly permanently.

    Replies: @Stonewall Jackson

    A question… are there covid related issues for the testicles, like mumps? Does it cause swelling? Geez… that would just be wonderful with all the other issues if you got a bad dose of covid..

    • Replies: @Abelard Lindsey
    @Stonewall Jackson

    As far as I know, COVID-19 does not cause swelling or any other outward symptom of the testicles. I've had the 'Rona twice and neither time did I feel any problem down below. The information for my posting came from two papers published in JAMA and Lancet early on of the COVID-19 business that presented the molecular biology of how COVID-19 would cause infertility in men. These papers have neither been challenged or retracted since their publication. This suggests some reality to this.

  11. @goldgettin
    @Voice of reason

    Yes,you are correct.
    What we don't know is,
    how and why in the heaven is this happening?

    Replies: @Voice of reason

    It’s called manipulation/control. The REAL pandemic is ignorance by those who would rather worry about what Donald tweeted about LeBron than actually educating themselves via individuals such as Michelle Malkin, who, for one, foretold of the fraud that occurred this past November well in advance with her investigative reporting on the ballot harvesting that ‘coincidentally’ was happening in the states that came into question, such as Wisconsin. Little, if any, compassion from me towards those who refuse to open their eyes or actually do some research/digging and just accept what FaUci, WHO, and their partners in crime, the mainstream media, feed them daily.

  12. @Stonewall Jackson
    @Abelard Lindsey

    A question... are there covid related issues for the testicles, like mumps? Does it cause swelling? Geez... that would just be wonderful with all the other issues if you got a bad dose of covid..

    Replies: @Abelard Lindsey

    As far as I know, COVID-19 does not cause swelling or any other outward symptom of the testicles. I’ve had the ‘Rona twice and neither time did I feel any problem down below. The information for my posting came from two papers published in JAMA and Lancet early on of the COVID-19 business that presented the molecular biology of how COVID-19 would cause infertility in men. These papers have neither been challenged or retracted since their publication. This suggests some reality to this.

  13. We were told 12 months ago by every health expert under the sun that the soonest we could possibly expect a vaccine for Covid was 18 months…and that was only if everything went perfectly and all the stars aligned, etc. etc. Well, now we’ve had the vaccine a few months…which means it was brought to market in not much more half the time we were told it would take.

    Pregnant women aren’t supposed to have misgivings about that? If health officials want people to believe them, they might start saying things that more accurately represent reality.

  14. Pregnant Women: Beware of COVID Shots

    Unless you voted against Orange Man. In which case, get as many as you’d like!

  15. Covid is Demonic Globalist lies.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Michelle Malkin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Becker update V1.3.2