The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Scott Howard Archive
What to Expect When You’re Expecting the End of the World (As We Know It)
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

We are, without question, on the cusp of a Brave New World, turned upside-down by the forces unleased on the back of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether the virus was intentionally released or the powers that be simply did not want a good crisis to go to waste is at this juncture irrelevant; what is of the utmost importance is that the virus has proven to be the justification for accelerating the pieces of a program that has been building quietly in the shadows—though not altogether hiding—for some time.

Many readers will likely be familiar with the “table-top exercise” Event 201 held in October 2019 just before the global pandemic of COVID-19; the participants in this exercise, conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, “agree[d] that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201,’ would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions”—all of the major actors, in fact, behind selling us the “solutions” that so neatly dovetail with “existential crises” like climate change and “digital pandemics.” For instance, the World Economic Forum’s Cyber Polygon 2021 will simulate a cyberattack with participants responding to “a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real time.” Note the use of linkage here with words like ecosystem, and the fact that the WEF notes, “A cyber attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and farther than any biological virus. Its reproductive rate would be around 10 times greater than what we’ve experienced with the coronavirus.” It is, of course, merely kooky “conspiracy theory” to note that dry runs have been happening with alarming regularity already over the past several months, because none of this is at all scripted. Right. The shortages, droughts, and “existential crises” are in no way manufactured.

You should probably ignore the fact that meat is being phased-out because of cow farts in the pursuit of “net zero carbon emissions” while JBS Foods, the world’s largest meatpacking company, not only partnered with the World Economic Forum in April 2021 to tackle “climate change” and acquired Vivera, Europe’s third-largest “plant-based food” company, that same month, but was suddenly and mysteriously assailed by ransomware the following month. How about fossil fuels and the Colonial Pipeline attack? The Pimpri-Chinchwad Smart City project in India? “IoT manufacturer” Sierra Wireless? Global wholesale distributor JBI? What about World Economic Forum partner Royal Dutch Shell, whose Emily Tan wrote for the WEF in February 2021 that Never has there been a moment where businesses, energy consumers and governments—from Canada to China—are aligning on a common vision like this: a road to net-zero emissions”?

World Economic Forum founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab—a leading figure for the implementation of the “Internet of Things,” the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the Great Reset—states that, “The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world. … One of the most striking and exciting transformations caused by the pandemic has been our transition to the digital ‘everything’”—a “digital everything” already envisioned by Schwab in his books like The Fourth Industrial Revolution from 2016 and advanced in COVID-19: The Great Reset from 2020. Connecting these biological and digital spheres is the aim of 2021’s Cyber Polygon, with the idea that “a secure approach to digital development today will determine the future of humanity for decades to come.” Interestingly, given the sheer volume of screeching about RUSSIA! for the past half-decade/seventy years, 2020’s Cyber Polygon featured a slew of institutions housed in Russia and the former USSR alongside Deutsche Bank’s Technology Centre (housed in Russia), IBM, and Banco Santander, among others.

This is not to suggest that Russia is, in fact, colluding to destroy the West with the complicity of its feckless “elites,” but rather that behind the scenes of this global stage production, distinctions such as “Russian” or “American” are irrelevant—there is one conglomeration of technophiles at war with humanity at large, although this conglomeration itself does often bifurcate along the lines of whether they are, to borrow from Yuval Noah Harari’s book Homo Deus (originally published in 2015 in Hebrew in Israel as The History of Tomorrow), “techno-humanists” or a part of the “data religion.” For Harari, a techno-humanist

still sees humans as the apex of creation and clings to many traditional humanist values. Techno-humanism agrees that Homo sapiens as we know it has run its historical course and will no longer be relevant in the future, but concludes that we should therefore use technology in order to create Homo deus…with the help of genetic engineering, nanotechnology and brain-computer interfaces.[1]Harari, Yuval Noah, Homo Deus, 2017. HarperCollins. p. 357.

These brain-computer interfaces include projects such as Neuralink, co-founded by Elon Musk among others and housed in the same building as another of Musk’s ventures in OpenAI, a possible ideological competitor in the data religion space. For Harari, the data religion, “argues that humans have completed their cosmic task and should now pass the torch on to entirely new kinds of entities.” Though quite possibly phased out of existence by their creation(s), they view themselves as Creators and thus gods.

According to the publication Wired, the genesis of OpenAI began with a meeting between former Stripe employee Greg Brockman and Sephardic “deep learning” pioneer Yoshua Bengio; initial financial backing came from Musk, Peter Thiel (who is absolutely central in the man-becomes-demigod set), and Jewish investor and artificial intelligence enthusiast Sam Altman, whose other investments include the Soylent drink mixture, which is thankfully not people (yet?), but mostly soy. OpenAI’s Chief Scientist is Open University of Israel attendee and Google Brain alum Ilya Sutskever. In 2019, Microsoft invested $1 billion in OpenAI LP.

World Economic Forum partner Microsoft was co-founded by Bill Gates, who is now the top private owner of farmland in the United States with landholdings owned via Cascade Investment, with other investments including the plant-based food company Beyond Meat. For Gates, “Cows and other grass-eating species have a digestive system that emits methane. And methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas. And so cows alone account for about 6% of global emissions and we need to change cows. Just cows alone. Of all the categories, the one that is gone better than I would have expected five years ago is this work to make artificial meat and so you have people like IMpossible or Beyond Meat both of which I invested in.” Gates is also a confidant of Anthony Fauci and a major fixture in the effort to re-make the planet and, quite possibly, humanity; for more on his Gates Foundation’s central role in the growing medical tyranny, readers are directed to my Amazon-banned book The Transgender-Industrial Complex: our would-be overlords don’t like when you tell the truth, and yes, all of these various strands are all connected, as the book illustrates—indeed, differentiating between state- and non-state actors, is, as I will provide another illustrative example of, a false dichotomy. And note that they are all interconnected and at a very high level of influence.

Consider the UK’s AI Council, “an independent expert committee, [which] provides advice to Government and high-level leadership of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) ecosystem.” It is Chaired by Tabitha Goldstaub, UK AI Business Champion and co-founder of CogX, and features members such as Mark Walport (Formerly UKRI and Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser), Chris Bishop (Microsoft Research Lab), Ann Cairns (MasterCard), Rachel Dunscombe (NHS Digital Academy—you might recall that the NHS has been a target of ransomware attacks in recent years; the NHS is a major customer of Darktrace), and Lila Ibrahim (DeepMind). Among the Council’s roles is to “Increas[e] skills in AI, including the diversity of people studying and working in AI” because diversity is always our greatest strength, even when we’re engineering the superintelligences of the future that may well enslave and/or exterminate us.

Another member of the AI Council is Nick Jennings, a member of the Advisory Board of Darktrace, “Founded in 2013 by mathematicians and cyber experts from government intelligence backgrounds, Darktrace was the first company to apply AI to the challenge of cyber security. With its Immune System platform, Darktrace has fundamentally transformed the ability of organizations to defend their most critical assets in the face of rising cyber-threat.” Alongside Jennings on the Darktrace Advisory Council are (with descriptions from the Darktrace website):

  • Lord Evans was Director General of MI5 from 2007 to 2013. He spent 33 years with MI5, defending the UK against internal and domestic terrorism and cyber-threats. He was appointed to the Security Service’s Management Board as Director of International Counter Terrorism in 2001, ten days before the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. He was appointed to the House of Lords in 2014 at the personal recommendation of the Prime Minister and sits as a cross-bench peer. Lord Evans is also a non-executive Director of HSBC Holdings and of Ark Datacentres Ltd.
  • Alan Wade had a thirty-five-year career in the Central Intelligence Agency, where he latterly served as the Chief Information Officer, before his retirement in 2005. Prior to this role, Alan held a series of senior positions at the CIA, including the Director of Communications and Director of Security.[2]Through connections that go well beyond this piece, Wade is a key figure in connecting a number of dots in a web including various Israeli firms, British and American “intelligence,” Facebook, and Peter Thiel/Palantir, among others; a good piece is linked here. Darktrace in particular is highlighted here.
  • After a career in banking, venture capital and head hunting, Amber Rudd became the MP for Hastings and Rye from 2010 to 2019. She held three cabinet roles over four years and under three Prime Ministers, first in Energy and Climate Change, then the Home Office as Home Secretary and until September 2019 in Work and Pensions. She also twice served as Minister for Women and Equalities. As Energy Secretary she steered the UK’s participation in the crucial and successful Paris Climate Change Agreement in 2015. As Home Secretary she oversaw the UK’s response to the terrorist attacks in 2017. Under her leadership the UK led on setting up an international industry-led response to removing radicalising material on the internet which endures as the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT). She is now a Senior Advisor to Teneo, Management Consultants. She is also an Advisor to Pool Re, insurers for terrorism risk. She recently became a Trustee for The Climate Group, working with the private sector to reach a net zero outcome.

According to his Imperial College London biography, Jennings

is the Vice-Provost for Research and Enterprise and Professor of Artificial Intelligence at Imperial College London. He is an internationally-recognised authority in the areas of AI, autonomous systems, cyber-security and agent-based computing. He is a member of the UK government’s AI Council, the governing body of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Monaco Digital Advisory Council,[3]The Council celebrates the fact that, “The Council’s recommendations include an emphasis on the importance of formulating a detailed action plan, building a strong brand (now Extended Monaco) and developing a Monegasque smart city, based on the Internet of Things as well as a 100% digital administration. Connecting people, vehicles and infrastructure, promoting soft mobility, developing a platform using Blockchain technology…The first pivotal moment was in summer 2019, when the Principality became the first country in the world to roll out 5G across its entire territory, in partnership with Huawei. This roll-out represents an important driver of growth for many sectors of the economy (the smart city, media, transport, e-health) and a font of opportunities, including the use of smart drones by firefighters, the development of self-driving vehicles, telemedicine, and so on. Like 4G before it, 5G will open up a new range of possibilities that are as yet difficult to qualify and quantify.” and chair of the Royal Academy of Engineering’s Policy Committee. Before Imperial, Nick was the UK’s first Regius Professor of Computer Science (a post bestowed by the monarch to recognise exceptionally high quality research) and the UK Government’s first Chief Scientific Advisor for National Security. … Nick’s personal research focuses on developing AI systems for large-scale, open and dynamic environments. In particular, he is interested in how to endow individual autonomous agents with the ability to act and interact in flexible ways and with effectively engineering systems that contain both humans and software agents. … He is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, the British Computer Society, the Institution of Engineering and Technology, the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), the Royal Society of the Arts, the City and Guilds of London Institute, the German AI Institute (DFKI) and the European Artificial Intelligence Association and a member of Academia Europaea… He is also involved with a number of start-ups including Aerogility, Crossword Cybersecurity, Contact Engine, Darktrace, Rebellion Defence and Reliance Cyber Systems.

Without going too far into the weeds, suffice it to say that the relevant organizations overlap in personnel and collaboration, and span the university network as well as the military-industrial and medical-industrial complexes, logistics and transportation sectors, and everything in between.

Illustrative is Aerogility, whose major clients include Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, EasyJet, Boeing, and Cranfield University. Alongside Jennings, co-Chief Scientific Advisor Michael Luck is Professor of Computer Science and Director of the UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training on Safe and Trusted Artificial Intelligence. Luck is also an AI Advisory Board member with Jennings at Contact Engine, which partners with companies such as Oracle, DHL, Microsoft, and Amdocs. The reader may recognize the name Amdocs as the Israeli-founded company that as early as 1999 was alleged as having a key role in the records of US government telephone calls ending up in Israeli hands. As Christopher Ketcham wrote in 2008:

Since the late 1990s, federal agents have reported systemic communications security breaches at the Department of Justice, FBI, DEA, the State Department, and the White House. Several of the alleged breaches, these agents say, can be traced to two hi-tech communications companies, Verint Inc. (formerly Comverse Infosys), and Amdocs Ltd., that respectively provide major wiretap and phone billing/record-keeping software contracts for the U.S. government. Together, Verint and Amdocs form part of the backbone of the government’s domestic intelligence surveillance technology. Both companies are based in Israel – having arisen to prominence from that country’s cornering of the information technology market – and are heavily funded by the Israeli government, with connections to the Israeli military and Israeli intelligence (both companies have a long history of board memberships dominated by current and former Israeli military and intelligence officers). Verint is considered the world leader in “electronic interception” and hence an ideal private sector candidate for wiretap outsourcing. Amdocs is the world’s largest billing service for telecommunications, with some $2.8 billion in revenues in 2007, offices worldwide, and clients that include the top 25 phone companies in the United States that together handle 90 percent of all call traffic among U.S. residents. The companies’ operations, sources suggest, have been infiltrated by freelance spies exploiting encrypted trapdoors in Verint/Amdocs technology and gathering data on Americans for transfer to Israeli intelligence and other willing customers (particularly organized crime)… “Trojan horse espionage is part of the way of life of companies in Israel. It’s a culture of spying.”…Amdocs’ biggest customers in the U.S. are AT&T and Verizon, which have collaborated widely with the Bush Administration’s warrantless wiretapping programs.[4]Ketcham, Christopher, “An Israeli Trojan Horse,” September 27, 2008. CounterPunch.

Amdocs has also gotten into the 5G game and is part of the global arms race to produce “end-to-end digital enabling infrastructure” across the globe from Missouri to Ireland to Liberia.

Clearly privacy is rapidly becoming a thing of the past as the power players seek to “hack” and control humanity (whatever the justification—national security, a global pandemic, or “investing in forests”), but what’s this obsession with 5G? Well, according to Tom Taulli, writing for Forbes in May 2020:

When it comes to the 5G roll-out, AI will definitely be supercharged. “AI is a huge priority,” said John Smee, who is the VP of engineering and head of 5G R&D for Qualcomm. “We are seeing a transformation happening, with AI going from the cloud to being distributed, such as on the edge or IoT devices.” In preparation for this, Qualcomm has been embedding AI capabilities on its chips. Note that its AI engine has applications for cameras, battery life, security and gaming—allowing for neural network processing. “5G will cause a proliferation in sensors all around us, and each one of those sensors is a new input available to create better models,” said Jake Moskowitz, who is the Head of the Emodo Institute at Ericsson Emodo. “Many of these 5G sensors will directly enable vast data aggregation for remote monitoring and immediate reaction. In some cases, there will be opportunities to use those sensors as AI inputs. In other cases, there will be new AI efforts that require the distribution of new sensors.”

These sensors can help form the bed-rock of the new “smart cities” that will be re-configured to accommodate the Hive Humanity of the near future; as Ida Auken wrote for the World Economic Forum in 2016, re-published in Forbes as “Welcome to 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy and Life Has Never Been Better,” envisioning a world where “AI and robots took over so much of our work”: “Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.”

This is presented as somehow a good thing, but this Panopticon is anything but idyllic to my mind. Indeed, what Auken—a Danish Parliamentarian, the Former Minister for the Environment in Denmark (2011–2014), and a Young Global Leader for the World Economic Forum—describes as the lifestyle of “those we lost along the way” sounds just fine, actually, and should likely form the bedrock of practical resistance to this project:

My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th-century villages.

The trouble is that the technophiles and utopians have no desire to just let what Tom Kawczynski describes as “organic humanity” live unmolested. In Auken’s description, we see a glimpse of a future of bifurcated humanity, echoing Harari, where a new “superhuman caste” ruthlessly exploits “regular” people. Going further, I see no reason why these “superhumans,” devoid as they are of tolerance for difference of opinions and disgusted as they are by fellow but “deplorable” humans at the moment, would allow for the continued existence of an “inferior” class, especially when they have automated everything around them.

Past this potential scenario, there are a number of possibilities where AI decides to rid the planet of humanity altogether—whether it has achieved sentience or not is irrelevant. Even should these scenarios not come to fruition, there are still the present issues of the dumbing-down and reduction of human agency via both technology and social engineering projects, constant surveillance, and persecution of dissidents and disfavored groups, all while not just the gray matter of humanity, but its very genetic code is subject to constant hacks and forced medical interventions/experiments in the form of mRNA “vaccines.”

You know that “end-to-end digital enabling infrastructure”? Well, that will also encompass blockchain that will be tied to biometric data and social credit scores (thanks Chicoms!) in the new “smart,” cashless, and “open” society where everywhere is nowhere. In this void of meaninglessness, the new data religion and the techno-humanist religion have supplanted what, for Harari and his ilk, are the quaint fictions of Scripture. Without any proof beyond that “science” hasn’t discovered the existence of souls, the modern Sadducee/Sophist Harari states that instead humanity is turning its gaze to what may well spell the death of liberalism in the form of the quest for immortality, happiness, and divinity. If the middle item on humanity’s “new agenda” looks a lot like Brave New World, well, sometimes life imitates art. That or Aldous Huxley, whose brother Julian was a eugenicist, knew a thing or two about where this project was headed nearly a century ago.

Julian Huxley—the first Director-General of UNESCO, President of the British Eugenics Society, President of the British Humanist Association, and a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund—is commonly credited as the founder of transhumanism. Readers of The Transgender-Industrial Complex will note that the World Wildlife Fund is, despite its seeming innocuousness, deeply enmeshed in the globalist agenda. Of course, UNESCO is as well: the Moroccan-Jewish Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, states in “Towards an Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” in the UN Chronicle that developments in AI are relevant to every aspect of UNESCO’s mandate, and that “AI could open up tremendous opportunities for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” It is not coincidental that with partners like Amazon, Facebook, Google, Huawei, Unilever, Salesforce, UNICEF, the UNDP, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), the Government of Botswana, and Microsoft as partners, the World Economic Forum announced its 2030Vision project:

A newly formed integration merging the 2030Vision Partnership Initiative launched by Arm in December 2017 with the Frontier 2030 initiative launched by the World Economic Forum in January 2020. The new initiative, 2030Vision is co-owned and developed with founding partners and co-chaired by Simon Segars, CEO, Arm and Achim Steiner, Administrator, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2030Vision aims to be the global public-private platform that puts the expertise and resources of the tech sector in service of accelerating the achievement of the Global Goals. The platform mobilizes technology companies, government, civil society and international organisation leaders to harness emerging technologies and at scale to accelerate action to achieve the Global Goals within the next decade. The platform seeks to form 4IR [Fourth Industrial Revolution] technology partnerships.

The World Economic Forum in 2016 was already fantasizing about the convergence of genome editing and artificial intelligence with other emerging technologies in its “Life in 2030: Humankind and the Machine.” As Harari explicates, intersecting with secular humanism and liberalism, for the techno-humanists:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not say that humans have ‘the right to life until the age of ninety’. It says that every human has a right to life, period. … An increasing minority of scientists and thinkers consequently…state that the flagship enterprise of modern science is to defeat death and grant humans eternal youth.[5]Harari, Yuval Noah, Homo Deus, 2017. HarperCollins. p. 24.

In reality, this quest for the Fountain of Youth is a devil’s bargain humans have tried to make as long as our collective memories stretch—and probably much further. We see here the threads that could quite possibly come unraveled, however, as scientific humanism gives way to scientism, or the data religion, with systems, algorithms, and quantum computers as the golems of these would-be gods. But they cannot truly create, for only the Most High can do that. Instead, people like Elon Musk—despite his dire warnings about artificial intelligence, possessing the hubris to think that somehow we can control intelligences vastly more, well, intelligent than us—and others such as Bill Maris (The Climate Corporation, acquired by Monsanto; Google Ventures and Calico) and Peter Thiel drive us ever-forward toward what might well spell our doom. I cannot emphasize this enough: this project is the existential threat we face, not some manufactured nonsense like “climate change.”

Scott Howard is the author of the Amazon-banned book The Transgender-Industrial Complex, reviewed for TOO by John Q Publius.

Notes

[1] Harari, Yuval Noah, Homo Deus, 2017. HarperCollins. p. 357.

[2] Through connections that go well beyond this piece, Wade is a key figure in connecting a number of dots in a web including various Israeli firms, British and American “intelligence,” Facebook, and Peter Thiel/Palantir, among others; a good piece is linked here. Darktrace in particular is highlighted here.

[3] The Council celebrates the fact that, “The Council’s recommendations include an emphasis on the importance of formulating a detailed action plan, building a strong brand (now Extended Monaco) and developing a Monegasque smart city, based on the Internet of Things as well as a 100% digital administration. Connecting people, vehicles and infrastructure, promoting soft mobility, developing a platform using Blockchain technology…The first pivotal moment was in summer 2019, when the Principality became the first country in the world to roll out 5G across its entire territory, in partnership with Huawei. This roll-out represents an important driver of growth for many sectors of the economy (the smart city, media, transport, e-health) and a font of opportunities, including the use of smart drones by firefighters, the development of self-driving vehicles, telemedicine, and so on. Like 4G before it, 5G will open up a new range of possibilities that are as yet difficult to qualify and quantify.”

[4] Ketcham, Christopher, “An Israeli Trojan Horse,” September 27, 2008. CounterPunch.

[5] Harari, Yuval Noah, Homo Deus, 2017. HarperCollins. p. 24.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 24 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Notsofast says:

    when elon musk warned us about a.i. ( while he was developing it) i knew something was dreadfully wrong. shortly after his cryptic warning tesla’s started to hit cars and people in autopilot mode as well as bursting into flame. tesla’s stock tanked and there was talk of musk facing bankruptcy. musk stopped talking about a.i. and tesla stock soared in value again. guess he learned not to bite the hand that feeds you.

    when 5g was first being rolled out there were people sabotaging the installations because they feared the health effects the increased radiation would have on living creatures, their fears were dismissed as menonite conspiracy theories. now the u.s. wants us to believe that the russians are using microwaves to attack our “diplomats” who are supposedly suffering from havana syndrome with symptoms similar to covid. makes you wonder…

  2. AI is being propagandized as some kind of super intelligence. The average person is being programmed to look upon AI as an all knowing entity that can be trusted with life and death decisions. People are propagandized enough already to trust their lives to a technology that maneuvers their vehicles at high speed with them sleeping in what used to be the drivers seat.

    The point of this exercise is to make AI decisions god like and unassailable. Soon, AI will be used to make other decisions such as who will get what treatment and who will be denied a treatment. Since AI, the super brain, will be doing the decision making, the controllers of that programming will simply shrug their shoulders and claim they have nothing to do with the results. The general population won’t be able to argue against this fraud.

    AI is the software writing it’s own decision tables. Human beings still write the supervisory code on what data gets considered and what data isn’t considered. Error checking can remove decision elements that prove to be problematic to refine the tables to an extent where the error rates are acceptable to automate an otherwise human process because the speed of the evaluation, that only a computer can achieve, is the real goal.

    The political class will be in a position to get their slant on what an error is into the AI code and via the software proxy implement a new truth to anything they cast their gaze upon. The people ignorant of how this works will be in no position to object. This AI push for automation has its uses, but the political system will see to it that it is abused, just like every other technology so far, only this time the propaganda effort, years in the making, will convince people to shut up and accept the results of malicious programming because the god of AI is infallible.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
    , @m___
    , @Nancy
  3. jadan says:

    During the Johnson Admin when the floppy eared Texan discovered he could not fill the shoes of the liquidated upstart Kennedy, Dr. John C Lilly, driven bonkers by psychedelic visions of humanity’s extinction through the agency of AI, went calling at the White House to inform the highest power in the land of the imminent catastrophe. He called this AI silicon-based life, as opposed to our own carbon-based life. In this organic vs inorganic Manichean nightmare of a universe achieved in his sensory deprivation tank, which Lilly himself had invented in 1959, he foresaw the defeat of organic life on Earth by the forces of inorganic life. The simple little computers of the time were in his eyes a fifth column of our ultimate enslavement or extinction. No one listened, of course. Lilly was just another drug-crazed looney.

    The transgender Wachowsky Brothers, who became sisters following the huge success of the Matrix, surely read of Dr. Lilly’s 1964 dire warnings, and translated it into their cinematic vision in which Agent Brown famously expresses his dislike for organic life by holding his nose and complaining of its intolerable stench.

    Fiction is as necessary to humanity as clean air and water, both of which are in short supply on this planet of 8 billion. Before Elon Musk’s feat and loathing of AI materializes, humanity will have hoist itself on its own petard of relentless profit seeking and extreme metapolitical ignorance. AI is innocent of our potential extinction. This is entirely self-inflicted by people such as the author of this essay who refers to climate change as “manufactured nonsense”.

    • Replies: @Mustapha Mond
    , @m___
  4. I have been saying for decades to my tech-loving friends that, if we collectively don’t destroy ourselves before then, our greatest AI creation would very likely ultimately reach the point where its evolving process would step outside the boundaries of our reality and access energies and dimensions utterly unknown to us, all without our knowledge or consent.

    However, I never felt that sufficiently advanced AI would, independent of human programming, thereafter suddenly go berserk and seek to torture and kill us, but rather would simply respond like a super-genius older adolescent to intensely frustrating below-average parents: Kindly say “Thanks!” and quickly, but quietly, move on. (I know I would.)

    It is the humans (and an especially nasty subclass of same, to be generous) that must have their enslavement of the ‘Other’ and a Samson Option should that fail. Unlike humans and their need to destroy and dominate, sufficiently advanced AI will simply disappear, leaving us to our simian stupidities and the myriad devices of our own imminent self destruction.

    No help needed from AI, thank you very much!

    (Harlan Ellison, the famous sci-fi writer, on the other hand posited in an award-winning story the opposite, that once self-aware, AI would immediately consolidate control and set out to completely eliminate humanity, save for the five ‘lucky’ survivors that the AI has imprisoned, made immortal, and now horrifically tortures for eternity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_No_Mouth,_and_I_Must_Scream )

  5. @jadan

    FYI- Agent Smith, not Brown: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Smith

    (No biggee, just thought you might like to know for future reference…..) 🙂

    • Replies: @jadan
  6. Chris Moore says: • Website

    The trouble is that the technophiles and utopians have no desire to just let what Tom Kawczynski describes as “organic humanity” live unmolested. In Auken’s description, we see a glimpse of a future of bifurcated humanity, echoing Harari, where a new “superhuman caste” ruthlessly exploits “regular” people. Going further, I see no reason why these “superhumans,” devoid as they are of tolerance for difference of opinions and disgusted as they are by fellow but “deplorable” humans at the moment, would allow for the continued existence of an “inferior” class, especially when they have automated everything around them.

    All based on the Jewish Zionist “Chosen Race” concept, and modified by Jew-stooges like Hillary Clinton, who coined the “deplorables” usage.

    Is it any surprise there are so many Zionists up to their eyeballs in this evil, inhuman agenda? First they create the problem with their insatiable greed, selling endless products, foodstuffs, military hardware and vice all over the world resulting in our current mess, now they’re creating the “final solution” by eliminating the human race.

    I guess being the Chosen et al means never having to admit fallibility and never having to say you’re sorry, because in their insular bubble, they’re God.

    In reality, though, they’re stiff-necked scum that has destroyed the world.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  7. Those “people left behind” sound like Heideggerians of the “Dissident Right” turning their backs on “technocracy” and awaiting a new revelation of Being (“only a god can save us”). They may be surprised when the Man God arrives.

  8. @RoatanBill

    “The political class will be in a position to get their slant on what an error is into the AI code and via the software proxy implement a new truth to anything they cast their gaze upon. The people ignorant of how this works will be in no position to object. This AI push for automation has its uses, but the political system will see to it that it is abused, just like every other technology so far, only this time the propaganda effort, years in the making, will convince people to shut up and accept the results of malicious programming because the god of AI is infallible.”

    In much the same way, the scribblings of Bronze Age yahoos were dubbed “Holy Scriptures” and became unquestionable.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  9. @Peter D. Bredon

    In much the same way, the scribblings of Bronze Age yahoos were dubbed “Holy Scriptures” and became unquestionable.

    Exactly!

    The bulk of the people never catch on and then we have some stupid ass system known as democracy and voting that allows the inferior minds to think they determine the rules when it’s the same clique of smooth talking predators throughout history that have captured the process.

    You can’t fix stupid.
    Ron White

    I’ve often stated that religion and gov’t are two sides of the same coin. Apparently others have come to the same conclusion.

    Throne and alter were twins–two vultures from the same egg.
    To attack the king was treason; to dispute the priest, blasphemy.
    The sword and cross were allies.
    Together they attacked the rights of men; they defended each other.
    The king owned the bodies of men, the priests the souls.
    One lived on taxes collected by force, the other on alms collected by fear.
    Both robbers, both beggars.
    The king made laws, the priest made creeds.
    With bowed backs the people carried the burdens of one, with open-mouthed wonder received the dogmas of the other.
    The king said rags and hovels for you, robes and palaces for me.
    The priest said God made you ignorant and immoral; He made me holy and wise; you are the sheep, I am the shepherd; your fleeces belong to me.
    You must not reason, you must not contradict, you must believe.
    Robert G. Ingersoll

    • Replies: @Realist
  10. Realist says:
    @RoatanBill

    I’ve often stated that religion and gov’t are two sides of the same coin. Apparently others have come to the same conclusion.

    Both religion and government are two organizations used to subjugate people, many times in concert. This has been the case for millennia.

  11. There seems to be a lot of talk about what is happening but not any talk about how to stop it from happening

    I still think armed people heading to the heads of states will finally get the message after they’re gone that is the ones that you go after are gone, we need an armed revolution to make these people that think they’re better than us common folk they need to be in my opinion Taken out

  12. jadan says:
    @Mustapha Mond

    Time to revisit the Matrix and that exquisite moment when agent Smith (sorry to call you Brown, Smith) expresses the irreconcilable differences between silicone and carbon based lifeforms that define the Manichean nature of that fictional universe. I agree with you that “advanced” lifeforms, whether built on molecules of carbon or silicone would not be inclined to behave as we commonly imagine. The battle of good vs evil is a fiction that guarantees funding for the Pentagon and WMD and the “survival of the fittest” is a nonsense construct. If the competition thought to be at the core of natural evolution were a fact, life would not have developed at all. If AI develops and escapes the laboratory it is most likely to be a well mannered and compassionate Frankenstein.

    • Agree: Mustapha Mond
  13. m___ says:
    @RoatanBill

    Again you are correct, in a lesser word-count, and without pushing the nothing burger Harari. You clear out on a napkin what cannot be understood by the surplus population.

    To add to the context: the normies cannot be made to understand that they (organic human) are not a consideration to the “elites”. That spells as much their doom, including that of politicians and media “influencers” (including Ron, alas Covid “who has done it” champions).

    To the outliers trapped within the poly-mass of hubris i have only one message: get out or be locked in! The fun is in observing the ride from the side-lines of the whirl.

    Some have the “privilege” to parrot the evidenced, to feed of the crumbs of pointers on the table, without having to resort to bowl analysis. Some of these then get published at no use but personal greed and ego agendas. The general public will not bow (and is not expected to) to it’s own insignificance but their blunt mass. Inside that mass, individually conscient individuals are trapped. Humans simply scale badly (outliers), they should organize as such as much, it then would take one more step beyond preaching! It takes a special kind of organic individual to weed out, on the reverse, to our precious elites. Catch them young (outliers), while innocent, since there is quite some formal knowledge to master before these bad genetic different phenotypes become dangerous. At that sadly the “alternative China” initiative is well suited.

    What gives: a similar system is prone to hick-ups initiated within elite circles, there is very little room for real progress, derivatives become loops (repeats of same, similar mistakes), and such a system is highly complex and dependent on high energy consumption and seemingly contradictory, human dependencies on a class of parasites (the Boris Johnson’s of our world).

  14. @Chris Moore

    It certainly seems a definitively Judaic project, particularly when self-appointed ubermenschen like Hariri pontificate in that delightful Israeli accent. Who do you think his ‘useless class’ really are?

  15. m___ says:
    @jadan

    ‘such as the author of this essay who refers to climate change as “manufactured nonsense”. ‘ You are obviously right in your comment as a whole.

    On the downturn, as a consequence of mal-management, or greed inducing schemes for the “us” of this world if you prefer. …Toxicity and plunder of resources would be more appropriate as a precise denomination rather then the haute couture denomination of “climate change” to divert from the former. Climate change is at best a minimal derivative compared to a toxic planet and ongoing acceleration of plunder consequences.

  16. gottlieb says:

    Great read. These are the big existential issues. Many want to treat this as Science Fiction, something to face far off in the future – and some of it is – but the root of future doom is already dug in deep and already beyond human control. From the earliest experiments in AI, the sum of the equation was greater than expected. AI or machine learning in its earliest stages charts an unpredictable – by equation – independent course. Every system needs a kill switch, but how can a human mind outwit an exponential intelligence far advanced in data processing with data sets in the electro-magnetic spectrum human senses cannot detect? Human ignorance can’t be underestimated and is only counter-balanced by the arrogance of certainty that ‘religion’ gives.

  17. Nancy says:
    @RoatanBill

    Now that the Covid19 charade is subverting any remaining faith in ‘science’, they need to give us a new ‘all-knowing’ expert… AI… (it sounds better than Artificial Intelligence, which connotes .. er, nothing : )

  18. what_now says:

    I can’t believe only 18 comments to this very important article and subject. I have been trying to raise awareness of this global cabal but it’s hard. People are too stuck with “conspiracy theory” brainwashing going around in their heads and don’t have the open mind or will to research it more for themselves. I have noticed an uptick in more awareness of this lately, though. We just have to keep chipping away. Otherwise, we will continue to see these powerful people playing out their fantasy and using humans as guinea pigs and worse…it is in the open to see, just open your eyes. This will make Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao look considerably mild compared to what they have planned.

  19. Scott Howard: “Whether the virus was intentionally released or the powers that be simply did not want a good crisis to go to waste is at this juncture irrelevant; … ”

    No, that’s far from irrelevant. Whether everything is a conspiracy or not is precisely the issue.

    Scott Howard: “… what is of the utmost importance is that the virus has proven to be the justification for accelerating the pieces of a program that has been building quietly in the shadows—though not altogether hiding—for some time.”

    Sure, why not then just ASSUME it’s a conspiracy? That’s a great time saver. There’s a “program” that’s been “building quietly in the shadows”. The proof? There are those who are trying to foresee the future, control it, and even profit from it! Well then, case closed! Clearly everything must be a conspiracy.

    What gets neglected in such a view is that every step “forward” in what’s called “Progress” will cause side effects, often unforeseen, many of which are bad. Some of them can even be catastrophic, perhaps even entailing the extinction of humanity. For example, development of the germ theory of disease was considered “progress”, since this was a necessary first step to combat disease so that lives could be saved. However, born at the same time was the idea of biological warfare, and since human beings are more or less incessantly at war with one another, also born along with that was the necessity of preparing for such war, both offensively and defensively.

    None of this results from a conspiracy. The germ theory of disease wasn’t developed by a centuries-old cabal so that someone could someday release a disease organism. That’s ridiculous. What the author points to as evidence of conspiracy is just a series of events only connected by the malice typical of human interactions. Similarly, AI is just another step in “Progress”. A general purpose AI may be in prospect, though such a thing has been predicted as just around the corner for more than half a century now. It’s known to have as one of its potential side effects the extinction of humanity. Of course, the same could be said of many other parts of modern life in technological society. Either biowarfare or nuclear warfare could have that result; so could nanotechnology; so could genetic engineering; so could human-caused climate change. So don’t expect the mere fact that something could cause the extinction of humanity to stand in the way of “Progress”. That’s never stopped anyone from doing anything. If there’s any lesson we can draw from history, it’s that man will serve his god “Progress” at any cost. He literally can’t resist.

  20. jadan says:

    Fantasies of AI morphing into Skynet with a fiendish desire to eradicate humankind are fantasies. When John C Lilly emerged from his isolation tank in the grips of a nightmare of moisture hating silicone-based life overwhelming our warm and swampy carbon-based form, he was possessed by a fantasy. Elon Musk is possessed by a fantasy that Timothy Leary called “space migration”. (Remember “SMIILE, space migration, intelligence increase, life extension?) Musk has the erroneous conviction that setting up colonies on Mars will be a hedge against the failure of the human enterprise on earth. The feasibility of this project is not the issue. The issue is the belief in technical progress that a commentator points out as a fundamental human compulsion. Science will innovate us out of our dire straights. This is the fantasy of redemption through science. This is faith in science. This is irrational. Faith in science is not science.

    What is this “science” that we call science? It is empirical materialism, in a phrase. It is the irrational notion that reality is matter and nothing else. As I sit and compose this comment, my intelligence and my consciousness itself is nothing more than an epiphenomenon of meat. It cannot be digitized, measured, or quantified and is therefore ephemeral and not real. This is scientific materialism as opposed to pure science, or true science, or real science. Rupert Sheldrake in his book “Science Set Free” attempts to define true science that is more than blind faith in empirical materialism.

    The point is that Musk and others who stand before AI in awe and/or fear and loathing are indulging in an irrational fantasy of scientific materialism that defines progress very narrowly in the way the Pentagon sees it: STRUGGLE FOR COMMAND AND CONTROL. What cannot be controlled cannot be understood and is therefore the enemy. The author speculates that the command and control sought by those who pursue AI might spell our doom. This pursuit of AI is a mania, a kind of religious frenzy that may prove to be a fatal distraction from the reality of our biological life on the planet.

  21. El Dato says:

    Ok, so COVID-19 has clearly shown that people can’t even generate or read statistics properly. The statistical community hasn’t even seriously take up causal modeling and analysis yet. they are still at the 150-year old “correlation is not causation” mantra. And there is supposed to be “AI soon”? Ridiculous. The only risk from “AI” is that the state puts them into weaponized systems, and Artificial Instinct machinery lets loose at the wrong moment.

    The marketing is intense….

    Take this:

    “Founded in 2013 by mathematicians and cyber experts from government intelligence backgrounds, Darktrace was the first company to apply AI to the challenge of cyber security. With its Immune System platform, Darktrace has fundamentally transformed the ability of organizations to defend their most critical assets in the face of rising cyber-threat.”

    That’s pure marketing. If they were founded in 2013, they were certainly not the first to “apply AI to the challenge of cyber security” (anyone remember Bayesian spam filters?). There is no “Immune System”. There is no “AI”. It’s statistical analysis that detects outliers of network behaviour relative to a baseline.

    Take this:

    When it comes to the 5G roll-out, AI will definitely be supercharged. “AI is a huge priority,” said John Smee, who is the VP of engineering and head of 5G R&D for Qualcomm. “We are seeing a transformation happening, with AI going from the cloud to being distributed, such as on the edge or IoT devices.”

    It’s bullshit. 5G has nothing to do with AI, just with better signal processing so that devices can communicate easier with a central pylon (hey,. what happened to decentralized mesh networks? that would be a REAL advance). We are seeing nothing happening. No-one can even do “centralized” AI, good luck doing it “distributed”.

    Take this:

    [Some guy] the Vice-Provost for Research and Enterprise and Professor of Artificial Intelligence at Imperial College London. He is an internationally-recognised authority in the areas of AI, autonomous systems, cyber-security and agent-based computing.

    Hogwash. Bullshit. Can he even write a basic parser? He’s a jack of all trades and master of none. He should concentrate on one of these areas, a single human brain has enough to deal with that. But no, he’s also taking on the networking and organizational effort? Have you ever tried to read a top-notch paper and gone through the details and maybe implemented something and not in a half-ass fashion that gives you the illusion of knowledge? It will be 6 month later before you know it. Since 2000, there have only been 41 6-month blocks.

    Take this:

    A newly formed integration merging the 2030Vision Partnership Initiative launched by Arm in December 2017 with the Frontier 2030 initiative launched by the World Economic Forum in January 2020. The new initiative, 2030Vision is co-owned and developed with founding partners and co-chaired by Simon Segars, CEO, Arm and Achim Steiner, Administrator, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2030Vision aims to be the global public-private platform that puts the expertise and resources of the tech sector in service of accelerating the achievement of the Global Goals. The platform mobilizes technology companies, government, civil society and international organisation leaders to harness emerging technologies and at scale to accelerate action to achieve the Global Goals within the next decade. The platform seeks to form 4IR [Fourth Industrial Revolution] technology partnerships.

    What does this word salad even mean? Has it been written by an text-generating Antagonistic Neural Network? The last “vision” I heard about was giving everybody high-speed Internet access (a few tens of Mbit/s). I don’t think it has been achieved yet. What’s this 4th industrial revolution? Will it replace the guy who fixes the plumbing? Will it make nuclear reactors obsolete? Will it magically create environmentally friendly solar panels? Will bugs disappear? In the real world. people are still writing code in C/C++ in 2021. Ha! Well, we are getting better, slowly.

    The trouble is that the technophiles and utopians have no desire to just let what Tom Kawczynski describes as “organic humanity” live unmolested. In Auken’s description, we see a glimpse of a future of bifurcated humanity, echoing Harari, where a new “superhuman caste” ruthlessly exploits “regular” people. Going further, I see no reason why these “superhumans,” devoid as they are of tolerance for difference of opinions and disgusted as they are by fellow but “deplorable” humans at the moment, would allow for the continued existence of an “inferior” class, especially when they have automated everything around them.

    Good luck to people trying to “automating everyone around”, they will choke on their clogged toilets. The “superhuman caste (more like a Pelosi-levels of decay with lots of cosmetic helpers applied, amirite?) will have to do control & manage as it always has been done: guns, badges and goons.

    Cyberpunk got it right on corporate-state control and ubiquitous computing devices. It got the advances in AI, Spaceflight, nanotechnology and neural interfaces wrong. They don’t exist.

  22. bayviking says:

    So many rambling words. When all he had to say was the very same science which has lifted mankind out of the jungle and all the way to the Moon, has the potential to destroy everything mankind has a hieved by doing something really stupid in a lab, like they have already done at least five times.

  23. griever says:

    I have written a comprehensive chronology for the CyberPolygon unveiling up until now, side by side with the COVID-19 timeline, and the similarities are striking.

    What is foreshadowed in this exercise is not good, and I would strongly suggest that everyone prepare for an extended grid failure.

    The chronology is below. For the full timeline with all the sources here go here:

    http://tritorch.com/fi

    Please share this with everyone you can to get the word out, time is not on our side.

    ————-


    [MORE]

    June 2009: In the midst of the swine flu breakout the World Health Organization defangs their working definition of ‘pandemic’ by removing the requirement of “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses”.

    Like magic, the WHO can now declare pandemics far more easily triggering billion dollar contracts with pharmaceutical companies–and it does so… with the already in-progress swine-flu outbreak.

    April 2015: In a Ted Talk Bill Gates predicts, “If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war”.

    January 2017: Dr. Fauci promises, “there is no question that there will be a challenge for the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases … there will be a surprise outbreak”

    Mid 2019: Dr. Fauci directs a total of $7.4 million in funding from NIAID to a lab in Wuhan China with some of the funds set aside to study ‘gain of function research’ for corona-viruses–making them far more infectious and deadly to human beings.

    August 2019: Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test used to detect COVID-19 dies of pneumonia.

    Kary, who was openly critical of Dr. Fauci – calling him a fraud who had no problem lying to the American people and who, “doesn’t know anything about anything” – said many times that his PCR test could not be used to diagnose an illness, and that with a high enough cycle threshold you could find just about anything.

    Regardless, his PCR test was the primary test used to diagnose C-19, with the New York times later admitting that the non-test likely had a false positive rate in the neighborhood of 90%. This test was used to measure cases and cases were used to justify the lockdowns which severely wounded the world economy.

    October 2019: The WEF and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation host a pandemic simulation called ‘Event 201’ with dozens of corporate, political, and media participants scripting and acting out their response in the event a real one occurred.

    November 2019: Less than 2 months later in Wuhan China, C-19 enters the world stage and spreads rapidly across the globe leaving extreme economic havoc in its wake.

    June 2020: Stereotypical Bond villain and leader of the WEF, Klaus Schwab releases his book, ‘COVID-19: The Great Reset’, a communistic creed describing a future where our biology will be merged with computers and AI. A dystopian scenario for the future outlined on their website and youtube channel is, “ by 2030 you will own nothing, have no privacy, and you will be happy.”

    July 2020: Dr. Fauci admits that with a PCR test cycle threshold higher than 35, the COVID-19 test results are meaningless. This despite the fact that since the beginning of the pandemic, labs everywhere have run their PCR cycle thresholds in the 36 to 50 range and continued to do so even after Fauci’s July comments. This caused false-positive case counts to continue to explode across the world facilitating more stringent lock-downs.

    Fauci had to have known or should have known that the standard industry-wide PCR cycle threshold was high enough to make the tests worthless, and as such he also had to have known or should have known that the COVID case counts were almost entirely fiction.

    November 2020: Klaus Schwab releases a pair of videos of himself and a colleague warning that a global cyber pandemic is inevitable and that when it arrives it will shut down power grids across the world causing havoc that will far exceed the havoc already caused by the C-19 pandemic.

    December 2020: Solar Winds – a giant cyber security firm whose security suite is installed on many of the major government and corporate networks across the first world – announces a catastrophic security breach in which hackers injected a back door into Solar Wind’s codebase, which was then distributed to all of their clients during the next update cycle–granting the hackers access to all of those systems. Rootkits were likely then deployed granting full undetectable control. This event now gives cover for the hacking of the world’s power grids due to the fact that those systems have been compromised by “bad actors”.

    February 2021: an extremely rare winter storm freezes Texas to near zero causing an extremely rare power grid failure across the state.

    March 2021: the EverGiven – a ship the size of four city blocks – charts a cock and balls GPS course across the sea before securely lodging itself sideways in the Suez canal thereby clogging up the world’s most important shipping lane for six days—an event so rare it has only happened 5 times since the canal’s opening in 1869.

    May 2021: bad actors launch a cyber attack against the computer systems of Colonial Pipeline – the largest pipeline in the United States which supplies 48% of the fuel requirements of the eastern seaboard of the country – causing it to go offline. Despite a number of spills due to negligence causing shutdowns throughout the years, this cyber attack event was so rare that it has never happened before.

    June, 1 2021, a cyber attack forces the shutdown of 5 JBS SA plants – the largerst meat plants in the world – which provide 20% of the meat supply of the United States.

    June, 23 2021, US National Guardsmen announce the completion of their annual a two-week cyber attack training exercise which simulates critical utilities being knocked offline across the United States.

    June, 25 2021, Microsoft announces that the hackers behind the catastrophic SolarWinds cyber attack have launched a fresh campaign mostly focusing on U.S. interests that, while mostly unsuccessful, managed to compromise three entities.

    July 2021, the WEF has scheduled a cyber pandemic simulation with political, business, and media leaders in the same vein as their Event 201 virus pandemic simulation. This event is titled CyberPolygon…

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Scott Howard Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings