The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
The Pale Male Paradox: How White Men Achieve Most and Are Vilified Worst
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It’s one of the most interesting, enlightening and eye-opening books I’ve ever read: Simon Winchester’s Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World (2018). Winchester tells a story of astonishing ingenuity, intelligence and effort from the steam-engine (44) to the “extreme ultraviolet” laser (296). And it’s almost exclusively a story of stale pale males—of White men from northwestern Europe. They’re the ones who have created the modern world, whether living on ancestral soil, like the English ironmaster John Wilkinson (1728–1808) and the Swedish machinist Carl Edvard Johansson (1864–1943), or transplanted to the United States, like the manufacturer Henry Ford (1863–1947) and the space scientist Roger Easton (1921–2014).

Logocentric lawyers vs exotropic engineers

If only one of those names is familiar to you, then you’re not alone. Before I began this book, I had heard of James Watt, John Harrison, Henry Ford, Sir Frank Whittle and “Rolls-Royce.” And that was pretty much it. Although precision engineering has shaped the lives of every human being on the planet (with the rare exception of stone-age tribes like the Andamese Islanders), precision engineers have not usually become household names. That’s partly because engineers in general aren’t interested in becoming household names. Instead, they’re interested in engineering, in solving technical problems, in overcoming the challenges posed by gravity or heat or cold or drag or pressure or vibration or chemical attack or any combination thereof.

The joys of Jewish ideology: a satirical diet-ad about the famines caused by communism
The joys of Jewish ideology: a satirical diet-ad about the famines caused by communism

But the anonymity of engineers is also partly due to what you might call the logocentric snobbery of Western culture. As Ron Unz has pointed out, the typical training for a Western leader is that of lawyer, while the typical training for a Chinese leader is that of engineer. This may give China a decisive advantage over the West in the century ahead. Or rather, it may give China another decisive advantage, because China’s racial majority, the Han Chinese, is not under ideological and demographic assault by a hostile elite of Jews and by non-Chinese immigrants eagerly applying the Jewish culture of critique. There would be plenty of material in China for a hostile elite to work with — the brutal subjugation of the Tibetans and Uighurs, for example — but the Chinese don’t intend to surrender control of their homeland to anti-Chinese outsiders. They’ve suffered the calamities of Jewish ideology all the same. Marxism has inflicted them with famines, concentration camps and a high-tech surveillance state, but they remain unrepentant in their ethnocentrism and probably unstoppable in their eugenics.

“The west was built on racism”

Things are very different in the West. Shortly after completing my latest re-read of Simon Winchester’s book, I came across two articles in the Guardian celebrating the work of Kehinde Andrews, the “first UK professor of Black studies.” Professor Andrews claims that he’s “probably done permanent damage to [his] mental and physical health establishing this Black studies course [at Birmingham City University].” But fear not: the sacrifice of his Black body and Black brain has not been in vain. Professor Andrews has spoken harsh truth to hegemonic power and established that “the west” (no capital letter, naturally) “was built on racism” — “that the US was created ‘in the founding fathers’ image of white supremacy’ and Britain’s wealth accumulated through centuries of African enslavement.”

Speaking harsh truth to hegemonic power: Black Studies Professor Kehinde Andrews (who is part-White)
Speaking harsh truth to hegemonic power: Black Studies Professor Kehinde Andrews (who is part-White)

Well, you can be sure that there are no anti-Chinese or anti-Jewish equivalents of Kehinde Andrews in Chinese or Israeli universities. And you can also be sure that Professor Andrews is even more ignorant about engineering than I am. Yes, Britain did indeed accumulate some wealth “through centuries of African enslavement.” But so did the Muslim world and African slave-kingdoms. And slavery was neither necessary nor sufficient for the rise of Britain as an industrial and technological giant. Black slaves effectively played the role of horses and oxen: their muscles powered mechanisms and economic systems created by White ingenuity and foresight, but Blacks had no intellectual or creative role in what they powered.

White men aren’t obsessed with themselves

And “racism” does not explain why White men were necessary (and would have been entirely sufficient) for the creation of precision engineering. But evolution and genetics do, as Kevin MacDonald has described in books like Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future. Nevertheless, Kehinde Andrews exposes one half of what I call the pale male paradox. White men have achieved most in all manner of fields, from engineering and mathematics to exploration and mountaineering. But they are also the most vilified group on earth and are held responsible for all manner of evils, from slavery and pollution to systemic racism and police brutality. Why does the highest-achieving group also receive the greatest opprobrium? That seems like a paradox, but I’d suggest it’s easy to resolve. The same factors behind the achievements of White men also explain the vilification of White men.

High amongst those factors is the fact that White men aren’t obsessed with themselves and their own interests. Simon Winchester himself is a good example. I could detect no trace of racial or national pride in Exactly. He didn’t write the book as a White man to celebrate the greatness of White men: he wrote it because he delights in engineering and ingenuity. More generally, you could say that he delights in external reality and humanity’s efforts to understand and control it — he’s written books about everything from maps and skulls to earthquakes and the Pacific Ocean. But he isn’t an autistic technophile and although he describes the astonishing achievements of Henry Ford in Exactly, he also begins the book with a series of quotations from the technocritic Lewis Mumford (1895–1990), including the line: “Forget the damned motor car and build cities for lovers and friends.”

Not interested in truth or reality

And he ends the book celebrating both the precise technology and the imprecise artistry of another group of pale human beings: the Japanese. He describes how, in Japan, meticulous electronic engineers co-exist with craftsman devoted to “wabi-sabi, an aesthetic sensibility wherein asymmetry and roughness and impermanence are accorded every bit as much weight as the exact, the immaculate, and the precise.” (p. 314) In other words, Winchester is objective and able to understand opposing ideas and points of view, quite unlike the rabidly ego- and negro-centric Kehinde Andrews. And Winchester is highly intelligent and scientifically knowledgeable, again unlike Kehinde Andrews.

Winchester and Andrews are therefore excellent representatives of their respective races: over-achieving, gift-bestowing Whites and under-achieving, grievance-bearing Blacks. Furthermore, Winchester trained as a geologist and has worked with advanced engineering. He’s a writer who’s rooted in reality. Kehinde Andrews isn’t rooted in reality, which you might suppose a fatal disadvantage for a historian and cultural commentator. But Andrews’ career flourishes regardless, because the culture of critique is not interested in truth or reality. Instead, it is interested in political and social power. It’s effectively an ideological parasite that has, so far, done an excellent job of subverting the nervous system of the West and taking control of its economic, technological and cultural muscles. That’s why the Black drug-abuser and criminal George Floyd is vastly better known than, for example, the White engineer Henry Maudslay (1771–1831).

Screw you, BLM!

Again, I hadn’t heard of Maudslay and his “formidable skill in delicate engineering” (p. 54) before I read Exactly. Unlike George Floyd, Maudslay exerted himself to defeat crime, not to commit it. He helped perfect the effectively unbeatable locks of his mentor Joseph Bramah (1748–1814). He then went on, in Simon Winchester’s words, “to become the founding father of precision toolmaking, mass production, and the key engineering concept of perfect flatness.” (p. 62) Among much else, he invented a lathe that could “efficiently, precisely and [quickly]” make something that contributed far more to Britain’s wealth than “centuries of African enslavement.”

The humble but hyper-important screw
The humble but hyper-important screw

What was the something? It was “that most essential component of the industrialized world, the screw.” (p. 63) Henry Maudslay, unlike George Floyd, helped hold the Western civilization together — and literally so. In a sane world, his story would embolden Whites to say “Screw you!” to inane and self-righteous anti-White groups like Black Lives Matter. But we don’t currently live in a sane world. Maudslay was an undoubted achiever, Floyd was an alleged victim. And the culture of critique “valorizes” Black victims while anathematizing White achievers. That’s why most of us heard endlessly about Floyd in 2020 and not at all about Maudslay.

Horrific hate-crimes against the Jewish community

Nor did we hear about a Swedish engineer who contributed immensely to perhaps the most important part of precision: measurement. But Winchester points out that the Swedish engineer has been unjustly forgotten for a long time: “Carl Edvard Johansson died in 1943, respected and beloved in Sweden, and forgotten elsewhere.” Johansson (1864–1943) invented measuring instruments known as gauge blocks or Jo blocks, which come in varying sizes and can be fitted together to measure, for example, “any of the 1000 lengths from 3.000 to 3.999 mm in 0.001 mm steps.” Winchester writes that Jo blocks are “machined with such precision that there [are] no asperities whatsoever on their surfaces that might allow air to get between and form a point of weakness. They [are] so perfectly flat that the molecules of their faces [bond] with one another when they [are] joined [and it becomes] impossible to break them apart. … They can only be slid apart.” (p. 3)

Winchester adds that scientists still don’t fully understand the physical mechanism behind the bonding of Jo blocks. In a sense, White ingenuity is still defeating White ingenuity: Johansson’s measuring blocks created a mystery. But another mystery was vigorously probed by the man who employed Johansson after he moved to America. That man, Henry Ford, is perhaps the most interesting and important figure in Exactly. Winchester cleverly contrasts Ford’s success in mass-manufacturing and popularizing the motor car with the elitist engineering and marketing of the Rolls-Royce partnership in England. But he doesn’t say anything about one horrific aspect of Ford’s story: his prolonged hate-crimes against the Jewish community.

Cohesive, in-bred and hyper-ethnocentric

As Kevin MacDonald has described in “Henry Ford and the Jewish Question,” Ford devoted substantial time and money to the mystery of how the tiny Jewish minority has been so influential in — and pernicious for — the Western world. He backed a newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, that tried to alert gentile Americans to what Ford saw as Jewish conspiracies against the West. And he published an infamous book called The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem (1920), which MacDonald describes as “an amalgam of dark speculations on Jewish conspiracy combined with some interesting and, on the whole, accurate information on Jews and perceptions of Jews during the period.”

It’s plain today that Ford succeeded mightily at mechanical engineering and failed miserably at social engineering. His attempts to expose Jewish conspiracy and defeat Jewish power were fruitless, but that’s hardly surprising. Like the other engineers and inventors in Exactly, Ford was a remarkable White male individual, not part of a cohesive, in-bred Jewish community bound by hyper-ethnocentrism and the ruthless pursuit of collective interests. White men are certainly remarkable for their ability to cooperate, but not in pursuit of their own ethnic and genetic interests. Instead, they direct themselves outwards, creating ingenious and awesome machines, scaling the earth’s heights, plumbing the ocean’s depths, and landing in person or by proxy on the Moon, Mars and Venus.

All Blacks Who Ever Lived

If the minds of White men weren’t directed outwards like that, they wouldn’t be so vulnerable to parasitic ideologies like the culture of critique and Critical Race Theory. But White men also wouldn’t have achieved astonishing things like those described in Simon Winchester’s book. So is it ironic that Kehinde Andrews and countless other anti-White ideologues go through life relying absolutely on White male invention and ingenuity without acknowledging the debt they owe, let alone expressing any gratitude? No, I don’t think it is. I think it’s entirely predictable. One could hardly expect Kehinde Andrews to admit that merely one tiny White group like the Swedes have contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who ever lived.

Indeed, the single Swedish male Carl Edvard Johansson contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who ever lived. As did each of the other stale pale males described in Simon Winchester’s Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World. Winchester didn’t write this book to refute the culture of critique and the inanities of “anti-racism,” but I think it provides a highly effective refutation all the same. It wasn’t written as a celebration of White male achievement and in fact I didn’t impose that interpretation on it as I read. After all, I’m a White male myself and like Winchester I can rejoice in engineering and ingenuity for their own sake.

“A work of staggering genius”

And Winchester also speculates whether the Industrial Revolution could have happened more than two thousand years ago. He begins the first chapter of this book writing about the Antikythera mechanism, a “lump of calcified bronze and wood” (p. 24) recovered from a shipwreck in the Mediterranean in 1901. It turned out to be “a mysterious computing device of unimagined mechanical complexity … that had evidently been made in the second century B.C. and was clearly a work of staggering genius.” (p. 25) It was White genius, but not in northwestern Europe, but the product of another incredibly talented European group, the ancient Greeks. And why did that genius not bear greater fruit? At the moment we can only speculate, but cliodynamics and historical genetics may soon be able to tell us why Exactly was published in 2018 and in English, rather than two millennia ago in Greek or Latin.

A work of staggering genius: the 2100-year-old Antikythera mechanism, an ancient Greek analogue computer and orrery used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendar and  astrological purposes (modern reconstruction)
A work of staggering genius: the 2100-year-old Antikythera mechanism, an ancient Greek analogue computer and orrery used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendar and astrological purposes (modern reconstruction)

If the Industrial Revolution had indeed started in the Ancient World, White men might have reached the stars by now. It didn’t and it’s the Chinese who seem best-placed to carry on the legacy of the White engineers described in Winchester’s book. Unless White men start devoting some of their genius to the problem of self-defence, they won’t have a future. Or even perhaps a past. The culture of critique is already proclaiming that Black women “played a crucial part” in the Moon Landings and the creation of GPS, the global positioning system whose genuine White male creators are described in Winchester’s book.

Proud Black wimminz in, hate-filled honkies out

As Black women are written into the history of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), White men will be written out. Our hostile elite aren’t really following the script of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), but they might as well be: “In his own schooldays, Winston remembered, in the late fifties, it was only the helicopter that the Party claimed to have invented; a dozen years later, when Julia was at school, it was already claiming the aeroplane; one generation more, and it would be claiming the steam engine.”

The steam engine, the aeroplane and the helicopter are all products of White male genius. The parasitic Party had already claimed two of them for its own in Orwell’s novel. In our reality, the parasitic culture of critique is beginning to assign the products of White male genius to Black women. That’s false history, but lies power leftism and it’s precisely because White men have flown so high that the culture of critique intends to bring them so low. Simon Winchester’s Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World describes the heights of White male achievement and serves as an excellent, if implicit, refutation of the anti-White ideologies now infesting and undermining the West.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 57 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. martin_2 says:

    Non-whites are humiliated by their reliance on white created technology and this explains most of their whining.

    White men (and women) are held to a higher standard than non-whites by liberal types. More is expected of whites in terms of character. For example, whites are supposed to “not notice colour” whereas for non-whites it is perfectly fine if they favour their own ethnic group or race.

    Non-whites, when they riot and threaten, are not taken seriously. Thus when some low IQ black man a few years ago gave a speech about “How are we going to exterminate white people?” (Remember that?) then it was kept up on youtube (it is probably still there) because everyone knows that blacks will never have the discipline, organisation, or power to exterminate anybody. But if a white man said the same thing he would end up in jail since everyone knows that whites, if so minded, could follow it through.

    My wife, being a girl, did not realise that the means of generating electricity actually needed anyone to discover it. I am not sure what was going through her mind, maybe she thought it was something like fire or the wheel.

    • Agree: BuelahMan
  2. Wyatt says:

    So is it ironic that Kehinde Andrews and countless other anti-White ideologues go through life relying absolutely on White male invention and ingenuity without acknowledging the debt they owe, let alone expressing any gratitude?

    I’ve yet to see someone explain this without devolving into psychology, but the explanation is much simpler than people make it out to be. Animals in nature don’t have existential wonder or curiosity at the environment that surrounds them. They have the expectation that the world they live in is a static place and that the only observable changes are the ones they, another animal or the world itself makes. With a few notable exceptions like the beaver, animals that are compelled by instinct to change their environment, animals tend to follow this behavior. The amount of food, the presence of rain or snow, the cover from predators: these are things that an animal will observe and try to take note of. They generally don’t think to change their environment to suit them, let alone think about what a place was like before or what it could be like after they’re dead.

    The only time this changes. A catastrophe that so devastates the land—a flood, a hurricane, a fire, these can cause an animal to change its behaviors and thought processes.

    Many of the dumber non-whites have this mentality and it’s expressed in one of two ways. For the ones born in the third world, western civilization is this strange, mythical place where life is divided between recognizable things like eating and talking and incomprehensible magic like generating lightning or flying high in the sky.

    But for the ones born in western civilization, they assume the environment around them is extant naturally. These facets of western civilization are trees in the forest. They’re just there as if they’ve always been there. They don’t bother to wonder at the many whites who went into paving the roads, clearing the plains or building the structures. So when you feed these retards anti-white sentiments, they have no counterfactuals to make them think what’s being told to them isn’t true. It obviously isn’t. Good white supremacists wouldn’t declare some 75 IQ proto-human to be their equals.

    The Chinese have the right idea in this regard. When they go to Africa, they don’t think to bring Africans back to labor in China, they keep them (largely) in Africa, enslaved via debt and government corruption and benefitting China. They don’t consider Africans to be their equals and they are 100% correct to think that way. Every soul in Africa could disappear tomorrow and humanity would hum along smoother than it is now, like a carbon deposit was cleared out of a six cylinder. But if you were to remove every European tomorrow, war becomes inevitable without the current counterbalancing forces, scientific and technological progress grinds to a halt, food scarcity suddenly becomes an issue and now the Chinese have no one to steal from.

    Just watch as whites continue to diminish in reach and the world diminishes in turn. It’s depressing, but at least nature is fair in its cruelty. The turd world is always just a week away from anarchy and the hands propping it up are getting fewer and fewer.

    • Agree: martin_2, RoatanBill
  3. Richard B says:

    Another great TL article. There are a lot of gems here, but this one stands out.

    But Andrews’ career flourishes regardless, because the culture of critique is not interested in truth or reality. Instead, it is interested in political and social power.

    He might be interested in having political and social power, but he shows no interesting in learning how to hold on to it. If he was he’d be just as interested in truth and reality.

    Of course, he’s just a proxy. He, the rest of the proxies, and the legion of White useful idiots, all serve the hostile elite. But none of them have made the connection between social power and social management. And social management means social institutions.

    They’re unable to see that truth and reality on the one hand, and social and political power on the other, are not mutually exclusive, they’re independent categories that work best when they’re interdependent, working together. But this doesn’t happen by itself.

    With social institutions comes problems (lots of them and many different kinds), with problems comes problem-solving, and problem-solving requires a set of intellectual skills, such as rigorous thinking, consistent reasoning, and cautious judgment. These require a technique of learning that itself presupposes a desire for learning.

    And all of them absolutely demand a commitment to reality and a pursuit of the truth which reveals facts that, provided we can face them, help us to not only survive, but live better in that reality. After all, the study of man should be in ther service of man.

    That’s the last thing the hostile elite, et al. are interested in. As Tobias said, they’re interested in power. Specifically the acquisition of power.

    And their particular manner of acquiring power was, as we all know, based entirely on a combination of infiltration and subversion and the naive goodwill of Whites, and, of course, lots and lots and straight-faced, shameless lying, not to mention denial and projection. Oh, and scapegoating, which they invented, literally.

    In any event, all of this explains their hatred of free speech, or freedom of any kind, and their corresponding resolve to abolish our basic freedoms all together. Simply because it would be so easy to expose them for what they are and reduce their entire BS narrative to rubble in no time flat.

    They can shower themselves with endless praise and cover themselves in fake titles, etc. But at the end of the day they’re still just riff raff.

    The more power they have the easier it is to see how crazy they are. “The whole world is watching.” as they used to like to say in the 60’s. They sure are.

    And the more they are the more they can see that the hostile elite and their useful idiots and paid proxies are not at all able to run the social instutions of a civilization more complex and unpredictable than ever before in human history.

    Because they’re not at all interseted in acquiring the skills required for competent social management. For a reason! The very acquisition of those skills would undermine their way of life and the worldview upon which it all rests. Hence the need to scapegoat Whites.

    But does the hostile elite, et al. really think yet more lying, censorship and violence is going to help?

    If they do then they truly are crazy. But, really, they’re mostly just corrupt. From that perspective, putting a poker face on corruption might be another definition of chutzpah. Still, the word “insanity” might turn out to be a synonym.

    There is no denying their destructive power. But I remain unimpressed. They’re simply too ignoble. And an ignoble person, or group, places demands on others. Whereas a noble person or group places demands on themselves.

    That is how the West was built. And it’s why the hostile elite won’t be able to hold on to it.

    Because the kind of thinking used to acquire power in the way they have, and the kind of thinking required to maintain that power, are two completely different things. They’re only capable of the former and aren’t at all interested in the latter.

    The difference between Whites at their best and those who hate them is that those Whites realized that civilization isn’t something you hold on to, it’s something you uphold.

    And they knew (as some still do) that that in itself required a search for the truth, a commitment to reality, and the power of facing facts, even and especially the unpleasant ones. But the hostile elite is at war with reality and the facts that go with it.

    That’s why, as I’ve said before, but will say again because it’s worth repeating, what we’re witnessing is nothing less than

    The Pyrrhic Victory of The Hostile Elite.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  4. Thomasina says:

    Sounds like a book I’ll have to pick up and read. Another great book about Western achievement is Bill Bryson’s “A Short History of Nearly Everything”. Absolutely amazing accomplishments and discoveries.

    I think the time has come for Critical Race Theory and the culture of critique to have some competition. Without refuting what people like Kehinde Andrews have to say (in fact, just outright ignore them), we need to write across the sky what we have accomplished, shout it out to the world with pride.

    Like self-centered children, these people take for granted what abundance has been laid at their feet. Because it was always there. They like to bite the hand that feeds them.

    Time to bite back.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  5. martin_2 says:

    “But for the ones born in western civilization, they assume the environment around them is extant naturally. These facets of western civilization are trees in the forest. They’re just there as if they’ve always been there. They don’t bother to wonder at the many whites who went into paving the roads, clearing the plains or building the structures.”

    I think you have explained very well my wife’s state of mind in this regard. She’s not at all thick, but more women than men have zero interest in technology or science and she is a bit of a stereotype in this regard.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  6. Malla says:

    https://www.whitenationalism.com/

    Yggdrasil had written in one of his excellent articles that cold climate past might have made Whites having a tendency to fight for some higher cause over mere survival unlike other tribal races. But I cannot find it out of all those articles.

  7. Malla says:
    @Wyatt

    As the West becomes weaker , there will be more wars, destruction and enslavement in between non-White nations. 1000%.

  8. Human slavery is a major factor explaining why industry did not develop in the ancient world. The Greeks understood steam power, but used it for toys and novelties, like automatic temple door openers. There is no incentive to develop labor saving devices in a society where labor is coerced rather than paid for.

    Another factor is that when Christians finally took over the demoralized remnant of the Roman Empire in the fourth century, they methodically destroyed libraries and universities everywhere, just as fanatic as ISIS or the Taliban in their hatred of reasoned inquiry.

    • LOL: anonymous coward
    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @advancedatheist
  9. @martin_2

    Shortly after my wife and I were married, because of a situation that occurred, I had the occasion to ask her which wheels do the steering on a car. She looked at me incredulously and answered the rear wheels while chiding me for implying she was stupid.

    My wife is a mathematician with a 4.0 GPA in 3 years from a major university. She’s not stupid, but has absolutely no idea how most things work.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Thomasina
    , @AceDeuce
  10. Thomasina says:
    @RoatanBill

    Men are interested in “things” while women are interested in “people”. That’s why it’s hard to get women into engineering and computer sciences.

    • Agree: Polistra
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  11. Men are interested in women. Are you implying women are things?

    Just kidding.

    I met my wife while we were software developers for Con Edison in New York. I hired her. There are exceptions to every rule, but I generally agree with your assessment.

  12. Tall poppy syndrome applies to white men and their achievements and in many walks of life.

    What is the most hated sports franchise in America? The Yankees. Why? It’s been ultra successful.

    It is a simple expression of envy.

    • Replies: @Polistra
  13. To paraphrase Steve Sailer, skintellectuals and grifters like Ibram Kendi and Kehinde Andrews get away with this scam because there is no one “respectable” in the mainstream willing to challenge their preposterous propositions.

    They would also be unknowns without Abel Magwitch-caliber benefactors like Jack Dorsey of Twitter, Birmingham City University, Boston University plus editors at The New York Times, The Guardian, The Independent, BBC and CNN.

    I bet Kehinde wishes he was a White man instead of a loser with mud hut tech ancestry.

    The sex deviants mafia plays the same envy game but with more skill. It got Alan Turing on the new British £50 note for being the “father of computers”. The truth is German engineer Konrad Zuse’s Z1 was the world’s first program-controlled computer. It had all the basic ingredients of modern machines such as the binary system plus separation of storage and control.

    The Z1 predated John von Neumann’s architecture. Zuse also came up with the first higher-level computer programming language.

    • Replies: @Gordo
  14. Richard B says:
    @Thomasina

    Bill Bryson’s “A Short History of Nearly Everything”.

    Thanks! Sounds interesting.

    I think the time has come for Critical Race Theory and the culture of critique to have some competition. Without refuting what people like Kehinde Andrews have to say (in fact, just outright ignore them), we need to write across the sky what we have accomplished, shout it out to the world with pride.

    Though it’s hard not to agree, it’s also impossible at this point to ignore the fact that, unfortunately, that’s exactly what they want us to do. I think the best thing to do is exactly what you recommended in the case of Kehinde Andrews, just ignore them all, as much as that’s possible.

    As far as Critical Race Theory is concerned, what can one say?

    It calls itself a theory, but states its case as if it’s the truth, when, in fact, not only is it not the truth, it isn’t even a theory.

    Like self-centered children, these people take for granted what abundance has been laid at their feet. Because it was always there. They like to bite the hand that feeds them.

    Well put and spot on.

    Ortega y Gasset referred to these people as the spoilt children of history, adding that they were filled with radical ingratitude.

    “Time to bite back.”

    Again, impossible to disagree, but, impossible to ignore the fact that that’s just what they want. Perhaps a better course of action would be to stand aside and watch their precious coalition of the fringes swallow itself whole.

    Because that will happen no matter what we do.

    • Replies: @Icy Blast
    , @Anonymous
  15. Five hundred years ago the Portuguese used natural materials and peasants’ hand tools (made by blacksmiths, not in factories) to build ships called caravels which they used to sail literally around the world. And the engineering, mathematics, astronomy, navigation, map-making, logistics, along with a likely system of banking and insurance onshore must have made a huge cognitive demand on the Portuguese people – but they pulled it off any way, despite living in one of the poorest countries in Europe.

    So why can’t black Africans do something similar now, given that they have access to the internet, fossil fuels, GPS navigation, modern tools and modern materials? Why don’t we see their equivalent of caravels built in Nigeria or the Congo which black Africans could use to cross the Atlantic and show up in our East Coast ports?

    • Replies: @Mr. Grey
    , @Reg Cæsar
  16. @Observator

    The Christians didn’t necessarily have to destroy pagan libraries. Hand-copied books tended to degrade and vanish any way before the invention of printing dramatically improved the odds that a book would survive over the long run.

  17. @Wyatt

    But if you were to remove every European tomorrow, war becomes inevitable without the current counterbalancing forces, scientific and technological progress grinds to a halt, food scarcity suddenly becomes an issue and now the Chinese have no one to steal from.

    A few years ago one of the cable networks ran a series titled Life After People, which shows the deterioration into ruins of our built-up environment if some unexplained event raptured the entire human species. But it really should have had the title, Life After White People, because that would produce pretty much the same result, even if plenty of other “humans” had survived and hung around the remnants of our civilization.

    • Replies: @neutral
  18. Icy Blast says:

    The truth is we have very little chance of survival in a political climate where even Tucker Carlson cannot bring himself to ask what “white” means. He’s afraid to say the words “Europe” and “European.” That’s where he draws the line. If he uttered those words he would be fired from his job immediately, and his Christian Zionist/American Exceptionalist audience would turn on him like a pack of snarling wolves.

    Apparently he wants us to believe that “white” Americans, so unprecedentedly wonderful, just dropped from the sky somewhere between 1619 and 1776. Like Rush Limbaugh, he knows his audience demands huge doses of flattery, both implicit and explicit, on a regular basis. Roundheads are like that.

  19. Icy Blast says:
    @Richard B

    More wishful thinking. We’re doomed.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  20. Professor Derrick Bell says that despite the civil rights legislation in the US, the social and economic conditions of African Americans have not improved.

    He doesn’t blame this on the fact that over 50 percent of Blacks in the US have IQs that are far below 85. Or on their unnatural propensity to commit crime and abuse alcohol and narcotics. Nor does he believe it is their animalistic instincts to impregnate their females and then leave their children fatherless and hungry.

    Professor Bell says the real reason is that civil rights legislation only passed in the first place because it served the interests of America’s White elite.

    According to Professor Bell, the only conclusion one can come to is that White Americans perpetrated a gigantic global illusion with the civil rights legislation. The Black Hollywood actors, the Black police officers, the Black bank staff are all figments of your imagination. There’s no equality. No equity.

    Plus White Americans attached a voodoo type curse to this legislation which keeps many Blacks violent and armed and drives them to commit crime and murder.

    Richard Delgado and his wife Jean Stefancic have dreamed up a way to make White America see the error of its ways in regard to this lack of real racial equality and equity. It’s known as Critical Race Theory (CRT).

    Here’s how he teaches it: First off, Delgado urges his pupils to imagine four different people and the everyday random interactions they might experience:
    ■ A child raises her hand repeatedly in a fourth grade class – the teacher either recognizes her or does not.
    ■ A shopper hands a cashier a five dollar bill to pay for a small item – the clerk either smiles, makes small talk, and deposits change in the shopper’s hand or does not.
    ■ A woman goes to a new car lot ready to buy – sales people either stand about talking to each other, or all converge trying to help her.
    ■ A jogger in a park gives a brief acknowledgment to an approaching walker – the walker returns the greeting or walks by silently.

    Delgado first instructs his pupils to think about these incidents with all the actors involved being White people. He then basically tells his CRT pupils how the negatively or positively treated White people reacted to the inadvertent or deliberate hostility they received from their fellow Whites.

    [MORE]

    He does this by getting his pupils to insert themselves into the roles of the Whites that initiated the contact in each incident, and then asks them a question: “Do you, for even a moment, think that maybe you are receiving this treatment because of your race? Or might you think that all these people are having a bad day?”

    Even though Delgado has in the fictional scenario left it open whether the reactions the White contact initiators experienced were hostile or friendly, he uses these questions to implant in his pupil’s minds that they all experienced hostility.

    For instance, if the child who raised her hand in class was positively recognized by the teacher, you would not begin a question to the child about the incident with “Do you, for even a moment, think …” Likewise for the jogger, if his greeting was civilly reciprocated, you wouldn’t ask him his opinion on the interaction by starting with the words “Do you, for even a moment, think …”

    You’d only start a question in this way to someone that had been responded to in a hostile manner. Delgado then hammers home that all the contact initiators were responded to aggressively by then firing this question at his pupils: “Or might you think that all these people are having a bad day?”

    All the people involved were White. Delgado has, not so subtly, instructed his pupils that the four interacting Whites were treated aggressively, but that they should shrug it off because the aggressors were simply having a bad day.

    All the CRT pupils are White. So, at this stage Delgado, in a very puerile way, has implanted in his pupils the notion that when White children or adults are treated badly or aggressively, it’s not the responsibility of the aggressors. Instead, it is the “bad phase” that the aggressors are going through that should be held guilty.

    Therefore, when Whites experience hostility from Blacks it can only be blamed on the Blacks having a “bad day”. But before the pupils even entered Delgado’s CRT class it had been established that Whites were a thorn in the sides of Blacks, so Whites are ultimately responsible for all hostile acts committed by Blacks.

    Now Delgado instructs his CRT pupils to reassemble the cast of characters in the original scenario. This time the actors who initiate the contact are all Black. But the people dishing out the negative or positive treatment remain White.

    Delgado then instructs his pupils to transpose themselves into the roles of the Black actors in the scenario by asking them: “You are a person of colour and these same things happen to you and the actors [perpetrators] are all white. What is the first thing that comes to your mind? Do you immediately think that you might be treated in these ways because you are not White? If so, how do you feel? Angry? Downcast? Do you let it roll off your back?”

    See the difference between how Delgado puts White-on-White and Black-on-White hostility down to people having “bad days”; while White on Black hostility involves him instructing his pupils that Blacks are correct to first and foremost believe that this hostility is based on their race.

    Next Delgado has to get something out of the way. You see, Black people have been known to be aggressive and rude to each other. So, now Delgado takes this up with his pupils by asking them: “And if the responses [hostility] come from fellow persons of color, then what do you think? Suppose the person of colour is from a group other than your own?”

    He then goes on to instruct that Black people being hostile to other Blacks or to other minorities is no more than: “Sometimes actions like these are mere rudeness or indifference. The merchant is in a hurry; the walker, lost in thought.”

    Now that Delgado has Black-on-Black, and Black-on-other-minority, hostility out of the way as nothing more than rudeness, he gets back to race.

    He preaches to his White pupils: “But at other times, race seems to play a part. When it does, social scientists call the event a ‘microaggression,’ by which they mean one of those many sudden, stunning, or dispiriting transactions that mar the days of women and folks of color. Like water dripping on sandstone, they can be thought of as small acts of racism, consciously or unconsciously perpetrated, welling up from the assumptions about racial matters most of us absorb from the cultural heritage in which we come of age in the United States. These assumptions, in turn, continue to inform our public civic institutions—government, schools, churches—and our private, personal, and corporate lives.

    “Sometimes the acts are not micro at all. Imagine that the woman or minority standing alone and ignored at the car sales lot eventually attracts the attention of a salesperson. They negotiate, and she buys a car. Later she learns that she paid almost a thousand dollars more than what the average white male pays for that same car.”

    What really strikes me about CRT is that it is actually extremely childish and boorish. And Richard Delgado is very clearly a bellend. A mediocre man whose true forté lies in conning isolated tribes in Amazonian jungles with two-bit turns of phase, duping them into buying plastic trinkets.

    But yet this obviously grade inflated POS is in a position where a pile of tripe he and his wife dreamed up is being forced down White America’s throat.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  21. @ForeverGone

    When whites buy into this stuff, THEN, and only THEN, are they being utterly stupid and willingly duped. Time to wake up and find and listen to the brilliant sages of the past and ignore the morons, the mediocrities lifted high by todays anti-white hating elite with an an agenda. As the old saying goes, don’t settle for second best, instead, go to the masters directly. Their voices are heard from the eons of time in many good books, not yet censored by the evil idiots of the present..

  22. anarchyst says:

    The author’s bias is showing.
    Henry Ford DID expose the jews for what they have become in today’s society.
    Henry Ford KNEW that, left unchecked, jewish political power would become a dominant force in the emasculation of gentile white males.
    He recognized that their social and cultural insularity would be used as a weapon against all others “not of the tribe”.
    Henry Ford was not only prescient, but foretold the future, the present-day society that we live under.

  23. Gordo says:
    @Amerimutt Golems

    The sex deviants mafia plays the same envy game but with more skill. It got Alan Turing on the new British £50 note for being the “father of computers”.

    The big three techies at Bletchley were Alexander, Turing and Welchman.

    If Alexander and Welchman are not on the £50 note Turing should not be either.

  24. Mr Jew says:

    If the Chinese are so smart, why did they inflict the “calamities of Jewish ideology” on themselves? You can blame a lot of things on Jews, but not your own stupidity.

    • Replies: @SchmunkDNA
  25. Realist says:

    Western Civilization has contributed more to the well-being of humanity than all other races combined. It is past time for Whites to make sure they get the recognition they deserve.

  26. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    > “Men are interested in ‘things’ while women are interested in ‘people’.”

    Dunno. A lot of men were/are interested in poetry, music, art, philosophy, psychology, sociology, babies, organizational behavior, painting, writing, nature, dancing, medicine, tailoring, being chefs, writing plays, religion, photography, film-making, and so on.

    Does the cholo polishing/modifying his low-rider on weekends feel nothing?

    Does the working-stiff doing OT to buy his son a new bike not “care” or “nurture”?

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  27. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Richard B

    >”Perhaps a better course of action would be to stand aside and watch their precious coalition of the fringes swallow itself whole.”

    At what cost? To whom? For how long?

    For the past half-century, Western men took that exact stance per feminism: do nothing and let it implode. It’s the response of the lazy, clueless, cucked, and cowardly.

    It also created many current cultural clusterfarks.

    Passivity empowers thugs. No bully stops on his own. Ever. Yet every time sane people counsel counterpunching, say, antifa, conservatives say “That’s what they want!” Who cares what thugs want?

    Finally, now does letting a droog rape one’s wife/daughter until the former is “exhausted” help anyone?

    Too many Western males refuse to get off their arses, having forgotten how to take action. They sit for everything, fight for nothing.

    • Agree: AceDeuce, Polistra
    • Replies: @Thomasina
    , @Richard B
  28. Thomasina says:
    @Anonymous

    The elite are trying to crush the White males (well, Whites in general) in order to bring them down. They are dividing the population on purpose (Black against White), and half the Whites are going along with this nonsense because they want to appear “better than”, not part of the terrible Deplorable crowd.

    They want to hold the U.S. back in order to build up the rest of the world (Malaysia, Indonesia, India, China, etc.) If they can hold wages down here (by flooding the U.S. with immigrants), destroy the power of the U.S. Whites, while increasing the wages of the Third World, the U.S. White consumer will no longer have any power over them.

    Up until very recently, if the White U.S. consumer stopped buying (for whatever reason), the rest of the world stopped. If they can bring the rest of the world up to the same level, it will no longer matter whether the U.S. consumer stops buying because they’ll have billions more that will.

    I described it as a breaking of the “union shop”. The elites are after control of the whole world, and they can only do it if the U.S. Whites are held down just long enough for them to pull it off.

    So this is not about the color of one’s skin (although this is what they are pretending it’s about) so much as it is about stripping and crushing the power that Whites once held, through their economic clout, over the rest of the world.

    Imagine the wealth and the power the elite will hold when the rest of the world is brought up and we are brought down.

    Destroy a country in order to own the world.

    • Agree: Richard B, Malla
    • Replies: @Richard B
  29. Mr. Grey says:
    @advancedatheist

    So why can’t black Africans do something similar now, given that they have access to the internet, fossil fuels, GPS navigation, modern tools and modern materials?

    C’mon man, haven’t you heard of Wakanda?

  30. Thomasina says:
    @Anonymous

    Of course men “nurture”, care and feel. I wasn’t talking about that. I was talking about what professions men and women gravitate towards and why.

    Martin (above) said: “I think you have explained very well my wife’s state of mind in this regard. She’s not at all thick, but more women than men have zero interest in technology or science and she is a bit of a stereotype in this regard.”

    To which RoatanBill replied: “My wife is a mathematician with a 4.0 GPA in 3 years from a major university. She’s not stupid, but has absolutely no idea how most things work.”

    Then I replied that’s because “men are interested in ‘things” and women are interested in ‘people’.” It’s a generalization, but it does explain why most women are not interested in technology, engineering, computer science.

    • Replies: @Polistra
  31. Richard B says:
    @Icy Blast

    More wishful thinking.

    The Coalition of The Frings are only held together by anti-White hatred.

    They’re enmeshed, not united, and are already at each others throats.

    We’re doomed.

    More doomsday trolling. Don’t be such a sissy.

  32. Richard B says:
    @Anonymous

    For the past half-century, Western men took that exact stance per feminism: do nothing and let it implode. It’s the response of the lazy, clueless, cucked, and cowardly.

    Rushing headlong into a crowd is also a sign of cowardice, and stupidity.

    How many people who think like you, in other words, how many of the Do sumpin crowd are organized and prepared enough to fight back in a way that will matter, in a way that won’t get you crushed like the worthless bug they think you are?

    Passivity empowers thugs.

    So does thoughtless action.

    Like the thoughtless action that took place in C’ville and the Capitol.

    No bully stops on his own.

    True.

    They also know how to take advantage of their victim’s inept attempts at self-defense.

    Yet every time sane people counsel counterpunching, say, antifa, conservatives say “That’s what they want!”

    I’m not a conservative. Conservatives think like crabs walk – backwards. They’re the kind of ahistorical dumbbells who walk around saying things like 2021 is 1776 while marching toward the Capitol to get their asses handed to them – again. Imbeciles!

    Finally, now does letting a droog rape one’s wife/daughter until the former is “exhausted” help anyone?

    Strawman argument advanced by yet another Boobus Americanus who thinks the person he’s addressing his comment to would stand idly by while his family was being attacked.

    What an idiot. Speaking of which…

    Too many Western males refuse to get off their arses, having forgotten how to take action. They sit for everything, fight for nothing.

    Right. Like you’re fighting.

    There’s nothing more pathetic than a trash-talking wanna be tough guy troll.

  33. Richard B says:
    @Thomasina

    Excellent comment!

    However, I would argue that there’s a snake in the hostile elite’s little garden paradise. And you direct attention to it in this part of your comment.

    If they can bring the rest of the world up to the same level, it will no longer matter whether the U.S. consumer stops buying because they’ll have billions more that will.

    That’s a big If and for a number of reasons.

    One being that many, if not most of those billions will be obsolete because of automation. What jobs that will be available will go to the those who have the education and skills, and that number is not in the billions.

    Also, whoever they select to participate in their little garden paradise will have to be organized, in as much as they can’t do business with a chaotic and confused society.

    And organizing that many people and keeping them organized, ie; kieeping them from tearing at each others throats, is not going to be easy.

    I know it’s not a very politically correct thing to say, but, the fact is, the defining feature of the entire developing world is that it’s filled with people who are constitutionally incapable of internalizing rules, norms and moral codes.

    And, since the developed world is fast devolving, that number is increased.

    It’s not that Western Civilization necessarily has a better morality, it’s that it has a more complicated morality, far more complicated. In short, I think the hostile elite have gotten themselves in for a bit more than they can manage.

    But that should come as no surprise, since self-awareness and psychotic arrogance don’t go together.

    This would explain their narcissistic sensitivity to criticism and their determination to abolish, not just freedom of speech, but freedom itself. But this is self-defeating.

    Because, by placing themselves above criticism their models aren’t subject to a process of feedback and correction, they’re simply imposed by force.

    The result is a devastating cultural incoherence and corresponding societal collapse. In short what we’re witnessing is The Pyrrhic Victory of The Hostile Elite.

  34. AceDeuce says:
    @RoatanBill

    A while back, 10 or 15 years ago, I met a mid 40s woman-a school counselor with a masters’ in social work from Bryn Mawr.

    In the course of casual conversation, I discovered that she did not know that a dime was 10 per cent of a dollar, nor that 3/4 and 75% were the same thing. She airily proclaimed that she “never was a math person.”

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @ThreeCranes
  35. @AceDeuce

    A masters in social work ? There should be no such thing.

    These are the people that think they think and then they make their voices heard at voting time. That’s why the US is in such sorry shape. Lots of people with faux knowledge.

  36. neutral says:
    @advancedatheist

    Life After White People

    The key question to what such a world would look like is if places like East Asia (and possibly the Indian high IQ groups) will succumb to the darker skinned hordes. Currently it looks like even places like China will be end up being replaced by Africans, the cause being combination of low fertility rates and the universal values ideologies infesting the elite consensus. If the entire world became black then it will eventually revert to pre 1500s sub Saharan Africa conditions, no amount of trying will keep the civilizational advancements produced by the other races.

    If somehow places like China saved themselves, which would require a complete rejection of the ideas of racial equality, then the world would probably see mass population reduction measures. A certain degree of civilization would still exist, but difficult to see how it would surpass white built civilizations.

    • Replies: @martin_2
  37. @Mr Jew

    If the Chinese are so smart, why did they inflict the “calamities of Jewish ideology” on themselves? You can blame a lot of things on Jews, but not your own stupidity.

    If Trotsky was so smart, why did he alienate so many in the party and end up in exile? If humans are so smart, how come they succumb to mindless microbes?

    Your question is so stoopid I suspect you’re really Mr Goy.

  38. martin_2 says:
    @neutral

    Of course the Chinese and the Indians won’t allow their nations to be overrun by blacks. Eastern Europe and Russia won’t either. Most of the world has ordinary ethnic pride and a sense of looking after one’s own interests. The current craziness starts and ends with White nations, apart from the former Soviet Bloc.

    • Agree: lavoisier
  39. anarchyst says:

    Not only is it cultural, it is nepotism and insularity that is at the forefront and assures jewish “success”.
    You see, jews are most likely to accept a marginal jewish individual than a highly intellectually gifted “goy” unless the “goy” possesses something that the jews do not have.
    Jewish “IQ superiority” is a myth. When your “group” controls the “process” it is easy to “game the system”.
    Blood is indeed thicker than water.
    It is curious to note that jews promote insularity, clannishness and other “networking” schemes only for themselves, but do their damnedest to discourage such behavior by the “goyim”.
    Today, us white heterosexual males are pariahs in our own country.
    Fortunately, we still have the “smarts” to drive technology, but will have to re-establish social networks that are exclusively ours.

  40. Polistra says:
    @Thomasina

    Likewise, there are women who are passionately interested in nuclear physics and higher mathematics. They make headlines! But they are nowhere near as common as men in those fields and exceptions do not confirm rules. I’m glad that there are far more women involved in the important work of child-raising. Most men are hopeless at that.

  41. Polistra says:
    @Intensifier

    Same with Tom Brady and Duke Univ basketball.

  42. @Wyatt

    Comically bad anthropology there bud. You are talking about imaginary people you made up in your head and then giving explanations of how they think and feel in the face of White power. Bizarrely nonsensical really.

  43. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Richard B

    They’re simply too ignoble. And an ignoble person, or group, places demands on others. Whereas a noble person or group places demands on themselves.

    Excellent. And very true.

  44. “Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself.
    Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared.
    The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation.
    The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it.
    And, superiority excites envy.
    Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities.”
    Joseph Sobran, April 1997

    • Thanks: ThreeCranes
  45. White men were masters of making things of convenience. But Jews dominated the power of conversion, the struggle for Big Ideas. Even Christianity is the product of Jewish prophetic power. And blacks are the masters of convulsion as they dominate sports and music that fill people with thrill and excitement.

    When you watch TV, you don’t think of the geeks who made it. You focus on the athletes and pop stars. TV, like other electronic appliances, offer convenience as a piece of machinery, but its main appeal is entertainment, and geeks are not entertaining.

    At one time, Japan was the #1 TV maker in the world. Sony was almost synonymous with high-quality TV. But people around the world who bought Japanese TV didn’t watch Japanese geeks but black athletes and heard black music. So, even though white(and to a lesser extent yellow) geekery created the global gadgets, the gadgets served to transmit blackness, which rode atop the horse of white genius for convenience.

    And it’s natural that whiteness would be most vilified precisely because it’s most valuable in maintaining the modern world and western hegemony. One reason is sheer envy among non-whites, but the bigger reason is Jews rule the West, and Jewish supremacist power requires whites to serve Jews. White pride would mean whites serving their own identity and interests. Thus, Jews need to fill whites with guilt and shame. This way, whites can no longer serve white interests and must serve something higher, like ‘diversity’, but then, Jews manipulate ‘diversity’ to really mean whites must suck up to Jews. It’s bait-and-switch. Make whites denounce and reject ‘white supremacism’, paralyze them with guilt, and then make them seek redemption by serving something higher… which is usually Jews Uber Alles.

    Jews and whites are like a man and horse. A man prizes the horse as a big strong animal that is very useful. But if the horse is free and proud, it will run free and not serve the man. So, the man must break the spirit of the horse so that the horse’s purpose of existence will be in serving man.

    • Agree: Malla
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @ThreeCranes
  46. Malla says:

    The huge achievements of the White race created resentment among non White races. Not only did White people invent most of modern technology in this magical age, Whiten nations were for centuries, economically and militarily the most powerful. For a time, European powers alone ruled the World and later during the Cold War, one would see an American YT leader and a Soviet YT leader being the most important in Global status. All that combined with the looks of White people (especially Nordic looks), the pleasantness and prosperity of White countries, good performance of Whites in military and sports as well as White looks, made darkies feel like monkies and White people like Gods. It was achievements in MULTIPLE spheres, Intellectual, physical, economical as well as aesthetic.

    And remember, many of these of these darkies, Yellows and Jews had their own superiority complex feelings. Chinese considered themselves Middle Kingdom while the others barbarians, Muslims (mostly browns) considered themselves of the revealed religion who will take over the World from the lowly Kuffars as well as their own tribal superiority feelings, Hindus especially Brahmins considered themselves civilized while the rest of the World as lowly mleccha barbarians etc… White achievements and other traits rained on their collective superiority complex parades. Hence this racial or civilization superiority-inferiority combo complex feelings.

    Jews too suffered from this superiority-inferiority complex feelings. They considered themselves the Chosen people of God, yet some centuries back they came out of lice infested ghettos to magnificent Goyim European cities. Also they were afraid, the rest of the World would look up to Gentile Whitey and Whitey morality would spread among the darkies and Yellows. That is why Jews have been extremely active in instigating darkies and Yellow against Whiteys, to play down YT historical achievements. Jews want darkies and Yellow to look up to them, not gentile YT.

    Blacks are different. White people are an enigma to Blacks. Blacks (and other darkies to a lessor extent) respect strength, that is what a primitive mind understands. YT is strong militarily as a group, but YT gentlemanly mannerisms and morality reeks of weakness to Black folk. They expect strong people to be like Big Chiefs or Ghetto Thugs. Thus primitive minds of Blacks are confused how such gentlemanly people could be so strong, militarily. “Obviously it is some kind of “Black Magic” Voodoo YT does to be strong”, reasons the Black man.
    This Big Chief mindset is watered down in other darkies in the concept of the Thug Sultan. Darkie populations yearn to be ruled by and dominated by Big Chiefs and Thug Sultans like a whore bitch wants a Thug boyfriend. A gentlemanly White (or Japanese) Colonial Officer is not to their liking though a part of their mind tells them that these colonial officials are honest and good rulers. But a part of them wants their own Thug Sultans and that is why, with time, the darkie World will slide back to Oriental Despotism, as they were before colonialism. It is 1000% inevitable. Modi, Saddam Hussein and Erdogan are/were movements in that direction.
    The Black man will NEVER understand the White man, who has a far deeper soul than the former. The White man and his “secrets” shall always remain an enigma to him.

    The Red Man just wanted to be left alone in his pace and level of development, he hates the fact that White man intruded in his pace and space, he just wants to be left alone. Red man’s case is different from that of the Black Man.

    Thus it is in the interests of Jews, Yellows, darkies to play down Whitey achievements and hate on Whitey.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @antibeast
  47. Malla says:
    @Malla

    They considered themselves the Chosen people of God, yet some centuries back they came out of lice infested ghettos to magnificent Goyim European cities.

    Also the Jewish soul (with some exceptions as individuals) hates gentile Euro Culture and aesthetics. It is too angelic for his dark soul, and hence he wants to destroy it with every opportunity. That is why Europe/West which was going Baroque and to the heights of human civilization has now ended in jungle ghetto culture. The Jewish Satanic soul enjoys with glee to destroy the angelic aesthetics and culture that the White Gentile Aryan collective soul puts forth on this World from the heavens.
    They also hate the natural logos and order of the White World, especially among Northern Euros (including Slavs) and more specifically especially among Anglo-Germanian-Scandinavian-Dutchies i.e. descendants of Odin/Freya/Thor worshipers. Hence they always rebel, fund rebellions against logos. Their souls are mindless Rebels Without a Cause.
    Their hatred might extend to Yellow culture and aesthetics of the Far East too especially beautiful Japanese Culture/ aesthetics as well as Japanese logos/order, one more culture taking us to the heights of Human Civilization.
    This hatred for angelic White aesthetics extends up to some extent among all non White populations except maybe Yellows of the East. They want to destroy it. The Cathedrals, the Palaces, the mannerisms, the White people who built them, Satanic (dis is real dark energy) hatred for them all.
    If you would send them Jews and their black minions to the heavens itself, they would destroy it and turn it to Orcland. They cannot help it,it is in their DNA and soul. With some exceptional individuals in both who are exceptions to this.

  48. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    And it’s natural that whiteness would be most vilified precisely because it’s most valuable in maintaining the modern world and western hegemony. One reason is sheer envy among non-whites, but the bigger reason is Jews rule the West, and Jewish supremacist power requires whites to serve Jews. White pride would mean whites serving their own identity and interests. Thus, Jews need to fill whites with guilt and shame. This way, whites can no longer serve white interests and must serve something higher, like ‘diversity’, but then, Jews manipulate ‘diversity’ to really mean whites must suck up to Jews. It’s bait-and-switch. Make whites denounce and reject ‘white supremacism’, paralyze them with guilt, and then make them seek redemption by serving something higher… which is usually Jews Uber Alles.

    Zionists (including Jew-stooge whites) have successfully harnessed whites. They’ve also harnessed blacks both via “liberalism” (ie the Democratic Party) and by their gatekeeper role in media, sports, entertainment, etc.

    Now they’re trying to harness Asians, and transform them into another milking cow for the Fed/International Banksters, too. Harnessing the goy animals is the Jewish modus operandi. Marxism was their first stab at it, but Big Brother crony capitalism has proven to be their forte.

    The key to breaking them is Israel, because Zionism is necessarily the touchstone for all of these racketeering parasites. True, a lot of white and multi-cult Globalists would certainly throw Israel under the bus tomorrow if the Jews would allow it, because as a blatantly Judeofascist state, it’s blowing their cover. But the Jews won’t let them because they need Israel is their backup plan and gangster hideout. And being the chess grandmaster of parasitism, top Jews have examined every possible angle and game theory to prevent it.

    So all the parasites are tied to Israel for better or worse, and have made Israel the “sweet spot” or, looking at from a different angle, the “sore spot” that can be hammered again and again until the Jews and their Judas lickspittle are brought to their knees.

  49. If the minds of White men weren’t directed outwards like that, they wouldn’t be so vulnerable to parasitic ideologies like the culture of critique and Critical Race Theory…

    …and contraception and legal abortion and divorce and teaching anti-natalist evolution to small children and prohibiting Christian prayer in public schools and general relativity and…

  50. @advancedatheist

    Five hundred years ago the Portuguese used natural materials and peasants’ hand tools (made by blacksmiths, not in factories) to build ships called caravels which they used to sail literally around the world…

    All led by their half-English pious celibate Prince. Where do you find the likes of him today?

  51. @AceDeuce

    By definition, to be a “liberal” is to be “not a math person”.

    They crow about how they’re the “science people”, but their ideology is deductive. The first principle from which they deduce all else is that all humans are equal and only their environments make them different. All that they call “science” serves to bolster up this contention. It’s not that their logic is bad, it’s that their first assumption is wrong, just plain bad science. They reject Darwin and natural selection. Though they would be shocked to be told so, they are the equivalent of the fundamentalist Christians in the Scope’s Monkey Trial.

  52. @Priss Factor

    The horse analogy is interesting but not apt because not only are Euro Whites stronger than Jews, they are smarter, overall, as well.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  53. @Martin_2
    There was always television just fewer channels. Beavis

    Best joke of Beavis and Butthead.

  54. @ThreeCranes

    Euro Whites stronger than Jews, they are smarter, overall, as well.

    Because there are many more white goyim than Jews, there may be more smart whites than smart Jews. But on average, Askhen Jews are surely smarter than, say, your average Irishman or Polackian.

    That said, there are enough smart whites that the white race can surely create effective defenses against Jewish Power. So, why have whites have failed?

    Because Jews attacked with all three forms of power: Wynandian, Roarkian, and Tooheyian. According to Ayn Rand’s THE FOUNTAINHEAD, the three forces are opposed, but Jews have shown they can all work in concert with Jewish Identity serving as the intersectionality.

    There have been great Jewish individuals who insisted on doing their own thing in the arts, science, and philosophy. The Roarkian Jews. There have been Jews who did whatever necessary to make tons of money and buy up stuff. Wynandian Jews. And there have been Jews who used the power of media and institutions to instill the populace with the New Narrative and the new gods. The Tooheyian Jews.
    According to Rand, these forces should be antagonistic, but Jews forged a formula of power where the Jewish cRoarkians, Wynandians, and Tooheyians are united by ethnic pride and sense of history, tragedy, and destiny. As important as individuality is to Roarkian Jews, Jewishness is higher. As important as money is to Wynandian Jews, Jewishness is higher. (Sheldon Adelson was stinking super-rich, but put Jewishness uber alles.) As important as the Justice Narrative is to Tooheyian Jews, it must be made to serve the higher priority of Jewish power. So, Jews have their Toohey in the form of Joohey.

    In contrast, white Roarkians, Wynandians, and Tooheyians have no unifying theme. White Roarkians put their individual pursuit above all else and don’t care about the white race as a whole. White Wynandians just care about money and have no higher value. And white Tooheyians, because they are earnestly committed to the cult of justice, don’t think to manipulate the narrative to favor white interests.

    Without race-ism, a people are over. When Jews denounce ‘racism’, they really mean “You goyim reject your race consciousness to better serve OUR racial consciousness as only we Jews are deserving of racial identity and pride.”

    Without race-ism, you lose the race. It’s really that simple. This is why anyone who uses ‘racism’ as an epithet is a darned fool.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  55. @Priss Factor

    Creative, as usual. You’re the canary in the mine, PF. Let us know when they come to get you so the rest of us can head for the hills.

  56. “. But they are also the most vilified group on earth and are held responsible for all manner of evils, from slavery and pollution to systemic racism and police brutality. .”
    —————————————————————–

    Most vilified group on earth? Tobias must be running out of comedic material. But his statement above is a fairly accurate statement. Whites have distinguished themselves in genocide, slavery, pollution and police brutality, and when they held full power without significant criticism, the often boasted about it. The above is a factual statement.

    .
    .
    .
    “High amongst those factors is the fact that White men aren’t obsessed with themselves and their own interests. ”
    —————————————-

    Oh really? Pause.. stifle laughter.. White men have been very obsessed with themselves and their own interests as opening any credible history book to the topic of say, Jim Crow or apartheid well attest. Tobias Langdon simply doesn’t know what he is talking about, or knows, but is running a cynical distortion of history for “the base.”

    .
    .
    .
    “Winchester and Andrews are therefore excellent representatives of their respective races: over-achieving, gift-bestowing Whites and under-achieving, grievance-bearing Blacks. ”
    —————————————————————-

    More laughable nonsense. SO let’s see.. white men are these nice, caring, gift-bestowing people? Ha ha ahaha hahahah ah… Tell this to the millions of victims of slavery or Jim Crow. Or tell this to the millions murdered by said white men in the mass graves of the Holocaust. Where are these “benevolent” white men? Stifle laughter..
    .
    .
    .
    That’s why the Black drug-abuser and criminal George Floyd is vastly better known than, for example, the White engineer Henry Maudslay (1771–1831).
    ———————————————-

    Sanctimonious piffle. If the point is to prove how “white man aren’t valued” it has already failed. More than 99% of the white people who lived 150 years ago are household name today, even notable inventors. This is Life 101. Tobias didn’t even know of Maudslay until a short time ago. Now he is supposed to be a 24/7 icon to white people? Puhleeze.. Floyd is a current news item that will/is already fading, just like every quick blip news item. He will go the way of Rodney King in a few decades, a dim memory that only makes a brief appearance in “ethnic studies” textbooks, assuming they are even around 1 decade from now.

    What Tobias and his racial propagandists don’t understand is that the more you demonize all Black and Jewish people, the more they will push back. When your propaganda demonizes them as evil and criminal, you expect them to stay silent and meekly kiss up to nonsensical talk bout “benevolence”? The day of silent acceptance is over. Whatever you put out, you get back.
    .
    .
    .
    “The steam engine, the aeroplane and the helicopter are all products of White male genius. ”

    So is the atomic bomb, nerve gas, napalm, and industrial scale ovens for killing Jewish children. But hey, why worry? After all, its all a product of disinterested white “benevolence”… A distortion? No more than the distorted piffle pushed by Tobias..

  57. antibeast says:
    @Malla

    The huge achievements of the White race created resentment among non White races. Not only did White people invent most of modern technology in this magical age, Whiten nations were for centuries, economically and militarily the most powerful.

    Not for East Asians. China still had the world’s largest economy and most powerful military up to the 1800s. The only reason China lagged behind the West was due to Manchu Obscurantism which blocked any attempts by the Han Reformers to modernize China and industrialize its economy, unlike Japan which did succeed in creating a modern industrial Nation-State after the Meiji Restoration.

    For a time, European powers alone ruled the World and later during the Cold War, one would see an American YT leader and a Soviet YT leader being the most important in Global status.

    Asian countries such as Thailand looked up to Japan before WWII while China became the de-facto leader of the Third World after Mao founded the PRC in 1949.

    All that combined with the looks of White people (especially Nordic looks), the pleasantness and prosperity of White countries, good performance of Whites in military and sports as well as White looks, made darkies feel like monkies and White people like Gods. It was achievements in MULTIPLE spheres, intellectual, physical, economical as well as aesthetic.

    That’s not true in East Asia, much of which are non-English-speaking, Confucianist-Buddhist Societies which have succeeded in building up modern, industrial economies with some of the world’s leading technology industries.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?