The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
"King of Kings" (1927) and the Origins of Jewish Cultural Censorship
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“My own suggestion would be … both in your interest and in the interest of the cause of the Jews of the world to strike out the words ‘Crucify Him’ entirely.”
Rabbi Edgar Magnin to Cecil B. DeMille, 1927.[1]Cited in S. Eyman, Empire of Dreams: The Epic Life of Cecil B. DeMille (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010).

Initially established in 1913 to manage fallout from the conviction of Jewish murderer Leo Frank, the ADL’s first major effort to engage in cultural censorship began in the early 1920s in the form of a campaign against Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent essay series “The International Jew.” The campaign began with a cross-denominational conference in September 1920, during which Orthodox and Reform rabbis gathered in Chicago to develop a strategy that would suffocate Ford’s momentum and stifle growing American anti-Semitism.[2]D. D. Moore, B’nai B’rith and the Challenge of Ethnic Leadership (New York: State University of New York Press, 1981), 115. The chosen approach was based on crypsis. The rabbis agreed that rather than condemn Ford themselves, they would draw up a statement condemning his writings as un-American and un-Christian and have it signed by prominent non-Jewish American luminaries. This crypto-Jewish manifesto was then signed by, among others, President Wilson and former President Taft, before being published to a gullible public.

The manifesto, however, was later deemed to have had only a minor effect in diminishing Ford’s momentum, so further, more direct, action was undertaken. Detroit’s Rabbi Leo Franklin was dispatched with instructions to personally influence Ford against further publishing against Jews. When Franklin failed to weaken Ford’s resolve, the ADL drafted “anti-discrimination bills” they hoped would preserve the image and status of American Jews, and mailed them to Jewish bodies across the country for lobbying purposes. Concurrently, the ADL initiated a boycotting campaign targeting the Dearborn Independent’s advertising revenue. Ford finally ceased discussing the topic when he was personally targeted in an individual libel lawsuit by Jewish lawyer Aaron Sapiro.

The episode demonstrated that, even in its nascent stages, Jewish censorship strategies were flexible and multifaceted, with efforts being undertaken in the social, political, economic, and legal arenas. In the following essay, I consider a less well-known, but equally important, instance of early Jewish cultural censorship — the ADL’s battle against Cecil B. DeMille’s 1927 biblical epic King of Kings. The King of Kings case, it will be seen, provides considerable insight into Jewish approaches to (and fear of) Christianity, as well as pathological levels of Jewish anxiety about security, and the remarkable variety of Jewish tactical approaches to perceived anti-Semitism. Perhaps most crucial of all is the insight provided into the nature and direction of Jewish social and cultural control, especially the overwhelming need for control over what the majority population believes and perceives, or is allowed to believe and perceive. The story of the ADL and King of Kings is ultimately about the contest over ‘ways of seeing,’ a contest that prefigured very similar reactions to Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ (2004), and that remains at the heart of American life almost a century later.

The Uneasy Identity of Cecil B. DeMille

Cecil B. DeMille (1881–1959), regarded by many as one of the greatest filmmakers of his era, was in some ways an unlikely candidate for an ADL-designated public enemy. He was halachically Jewish via his mother Matilda Beatrice Samuel. He worked closely with Jewish producers Jesse Lasky and Schmuel Gelbfisz (later Samuel Goldwyn), and he enjoyed his greatest success in an industry dominated by Jews. His relationship to Jewishness, however, was complex. His mother disowned her family and Jewish roots when her parents objected to her intentions to marry a Christian, the Episcopalian businessman Henry Churchill de Mille. She later engaged in an apparently sincere conversion to de Mille’s religion. There were no trappings of Jewishness in DeMille’s childhood home, and both Cecil and his brother William were reported by friends and relatives to have held anti-Semitic views as adults. They are also said to possess a subtle resentment of their partial Jewish ancestry. Biographer Scott Eyman has argued that DeMille consistently emphasized only his Episcopalian background to the press during his early ascent in the movie industry, prompting “people who knew his mother in New York” to “assume a covert anti-Semitism, a stance that would only be strengthened by his future status as a pillar of California’s right wing.”[3]Eyman, Empire of Dreams. William DeMille’s daughter Agnes, a dancer, recalled her father at times railing against her “Broadway Jew manager,” and that her uncle Cecil once confided to her “I don’t like the Jewish people out here.” Cecil DeMille’s longtime screenwriter, Jesse Lasky Jr, commented after DeMille’s death: “He did not heavily identify himself with Jews.”[4]Ibid.
(Eyman, Empire of Dreams.)

Despite discomfort with his origins, DeMille was intelligent enough to use his Jewish ancestry, in the right company, to help him navigate a heavily Jewish industry. The Jewish Tribune pointed out in the late 1920s that DeMille “considers it of great commercial and strategic importance to boast of the Jewish blood in his veins.” And, as will be discussed below, in certain contexts, DeMille would often praise Jews and their characteristics. DeMille thus comes across as an opportunist, who identified with his own success more than any ethnic cause or group, and who could simultaneously hold deep ambivalence about his Jewish background while understanding that this uncomfortable fact would be useful for his career in an industry that operated like a Jewish cousinhood. Jesse Lasky Jr probably summed it up best when he argued that DeMille ultimately didn’t identify with anyone: “He had a suspicion that most people might not be worth identifying with anyway. He served his own Gods.”

King of Kings

By 1926, DeMille had made a personal fortune directing movies for Jewish producers. It seemed a logical next step that he should strike out on his own, and DeMille Pictures Corporation was born. His first two pictures, however, The Road to Yesterday and The Volga Boatman, were a flop and a hit respectively, thus cancelling each other out and placing the new production company, now bleeding capital, in significant peril. He needed a significant hit. In May 1926, Denison Clift, a DeMille studio contract writer, wrote a memo to DeMille:

Why skirt around the one great single subject of all time and all ages — the commanding, majestic, and most sublime thing that any man can ever put upon the screen: the Life, Trial, Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Ascension of Christ: in other words: the LIFE OF CHRIST, with its awe-inspiring power, its simplicity and its unutterable tragedy. … The title of the picture would be: THE KING OF KINGS.

DeMille threw himself into the project with intensity, working with screenwriter Jeanie MacPherson on a script that closely followed the Gospels with one exception. Reflecting his penchant for more seedy material, and the perennial notion that “sex sells,” DeMille personally held the belief that Judas had not betrayed Christ for money, but because Judas lusted for Mary Magdalene and had been frustrated by Christ’s conversion of her. DeMille expected that this change, even introduced subtly, would result in some minor complaints from Church authorities, but he was extremely pleased with a final script that ran to a mammoth 366 pages. In the end, DeMille had little to fear from the Church.

The Synagogue was a different matter. DeMille was aware, from the earliest stages of the project, of a need to manage Jewish sensibilities. On August 23, 1926, the day before production began, DeMille assembled all senior cast and crew for a six and a half hour meeting at his home. At one point, DeMille told those present:

We have to protect all classes of people, especially the Jew. The purpose is to treat all classes fairly and particularly the Jew, because the Jew is put in the most unfortunate place of any race in the Bible because it was not really a matter of the Jew having persecuted Jesus, it was Rome — Rome with her politics and graft. … The Jews are a very great race, a very sensitive race and we have no desire to hurt them, nor do we desire to hurt anyone.

DeMille also expressed the opinion during the early stages of filming that the movie would bear great responsibility not only in fixing in the public mind an image of Christ, but also an image of those responsible for his crucifixion. In addition to his own anxieties, at least one major film executive wrote to DeMille expressing the hope that DeMille would do all he could to “get around the Bible’s anti-Semitism,” mainly by opening the picture with a caption stressing Roman dominance in Judea and other rhetorical conceits intended to portray the Romans as the primary antagonists. Eyman argues that, throughout filming, DeMille “strove to ameliorate any charges of anti-Semitism.” DeMille completely removed Matthew 27:25 (“His blood be on us, and on our children”) and instead inserted a line for Caiaphas the High Priest during the earthquake the follows the Crucifixion: “Lord God Jehovah! Visit not Thy wrath on Thy people Israel — I alone am guilty.” The move was designed to completely side-step the issue of Jewish communal and generational guilt for the death of Christ.

Caiaphas (Rudolf Schildkraut) pays Judas (Joseph Schildkraut)
Caiaphas (Rudolf Schildkraut) pays Judas (Joseph Schildkraut)

While showing tremendous sensitivity to Jewish interests in the text of the film, DeMille was stunningly unaware of the implications of his casting choices. Jesus and the Disciples were portrayed by young actors of northern European heritage, while DeMille insisted that the Jewish mob was played by extras culled from nearby Jewish quarters, along with Caiaphas and Judas, who were played by the Jewish father and son Rudolph and Joseph Schildkraut.[5]For an interesting perspective on the casting of the Schildkraut’s see A.K. Koslovic, “The Deep Focus Casting of Joseph Schildkraut as Judas Figure in Four DeMille Films,” Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 6 (2004). This practice of ethnic casting alone was to prove infuriating to Jewish authorities across America, who insisted that, despite DeMille’s alterations to the Gospel, the film remained an anti-Semitic Blood Libel.

The Jewish Reaction

DeMille’s King of Kings was released to huge public acclaim on May 18, 1927, and was every bit the commercial and critical success that DeMille hoped it would be. In fact, the only negative reaction to the film came from the organized Jewish community, which reacted to King of Kings with what can only be described as extreme vitriol. In the words of Jenna Weissman, “Where Christian America showered the film with hosannas, Jewish America pummelled it with brickbats.”[6]J. Weissman, Set in Stone: America’s Embrace of the Ten Commandments (Oxford University Press, 2017), 40. The Jewish Tribune led the initial campaign against DeMille with some deeply personal comments concerning racial betrayal:

[DeMille] brooks no argument, no contradictions, no independence, no apologies reflecting upon him. … Cecil is the real son of his mother … an English Jewess who embraced the Christian faith early in her life. … Mrs. DeMille does not consider herself a Jewess, but Cecil even now likes to repeat to every handy listener how proud he is of having a Jewish mother. … It is as if he were naively, yet sincerely, saying to the Jewish press and pulpit which accuse him of the betrayal of the Jewish race, “Can a man who is proud of his Jewish origins betray the Jewish race?”

The article went on to state that DeMille was a new Henry Ford, with King of Kings likely to become the motion picture equivalent of The International Jew. The remarkable assertion was also made, despite all glaring evidence to the contrary, that the film was a flop, and had only been rescued by publicity surrounding its anti-Semitism. As DeMille biographer Scott Eyman points out, the Jewish Tribune, consumed with hysteria, had abandoned all logic:

The Jewish Tribune tried to have it both ways: castigating DeMille for freely acknowledging his Jewish heritage, when they would have undoubtedly castigated him even more had he avoided the matter, then bewailing the way the Jewish media had risen to take the director’s bait even as the article itself was part of the protests.

Prominent Zionist and Jewish activist Rabbi Stephen Wise entered the fray, saying the film would not have been made if a single Jew in Hollywood had acted “with the stature of a man.” Wise was the first major Jewish figure to call for the complete censorship of the film, telling one reporter, “I do not believe that the picture is curable. The only way to mend it is to end it. … The blood of Jews will be on the heads of the owners of this picture.”

Eyman writes that DeMille was “bewildered by this criticism,” having gone to great lengths to absolve Jews of any communal responsibility for Christ’s execution. Eyman suggests that DeMille probably reflected back on the September 1926 letter from an unnamed executive demanding that the movie place all blame for the crucifixion on the Romans. In DeMille’s opinion at the time, this would have represented too great a departure from the Bible, so he opted instead to attempt to place blame solely on Caiaphas. And DeMille had invested much in this attempt at pacification. Caiaphas is introduced in the film not as a Jewish High Priest, but as a “Roman appointee.” When Pilate asks the crowd, “Shall I crucify your king?,” it is not the entire collective of chief priests—as in John 19:15—but Caiaphas alone who responds “We have no king but caesar.” Throughout the film, Eyman stresses, DeMille reconfigures the blame solely upon this Romanized High Priest. It was now clear to DeMille, however, from the Jewish reaction to King of Kings, that any suggestion that Jesus was executed at the instigation of even a single Jew was more than the Jews of America would tolerate. They wanted nothing less than a rewrite of the Gospels.

DeMille was furious. During the latter stages of filming, he was often seen quietly staring at a portrait of Christ that he had placed on his desk, prompting at least one close associate to speculate that DeMille was beginning to become “deeply religious.” Jewish reactions to King of Kings certainly hit a strong nerve with DeMille, something indicated in a letter to a non-Jewish colleague:

I felt [the Jewish leaders] would greatly harm the Jewish race by bringing the matter to an open fight. … Someone in the Jewish race is trying to start trouble. This trouble should be stopped immediately for the good of all, as it could very easily lead to a situation that might be very destructive. Those Jews who are raising these rather violent objections would crucify Christ a second time if they had the opportunity, as they are so ready to crucify what, for want of a better term, I shall call His second coming upon the screen.[7]M. Bernstein (ed), Controlling Hollywood: Censorship and Regulation in the Radio Era (Athlone, 2000), 80.

Demands for changes to the film were formalized and broadened via the intervention of the ADL, with demands for substantial cuts and rewrites in return for a cessation of Jewish protests. The ADL contacted Los Angeles-based Rabbi Edgar Magnin, an associate of DeMille’s, and asked Magnin to persuade DeMille to acquiesce. The ADL projected power but was clearly only too aware of the popularity of the film and of DeMille, with the result that the ADL was as keen to see an end to the furor (though with its interests achieved) as DeMille. This tightrope situation was expressed succinctly by Magnin in a letter to DeMille dated September 28 1927:

An open rupture between [the Anti-Defamation League] and you could do absolutely no good to either and would likely result in harm to both. … Strike out the words ‘Crucify Him’ entirely. It would appear to me the action in itself is descriptive enough without the title. … Please give this your most careful and thoughtful consideration in the next few days, and if you can possibly do so, accede to the request of the League.

DeMille attempted to buy time by hastily preparing a memo describing actions he had taken to protect Jews during the making of the film, but the Jewish pressure continued. Resolutions condemning the film were passed by the United Synagogue of America, the Board of Rabbis of Northern California, and numerous similar groups across the country. Private detectives were hired to follow H. B. Warner, who played Jesus, in the hope that any discovered revelations about his private life (he did have a drinking problem) would help diminish ‘Jesus’ in the minds of the viewing public. The Schildkrauts, who played Caiaphas and Judas, were attacked as race traitors in Jewish editorials for allowing themselves to be cast in their villainous roles. DeMille later recalled, “Joseph was frightened. Joseph thought his career was through.” Felicia Herman writes that “the controversy over the film raged through November and December, receiving almost constant attention in Jewish newspapers through the nation.”[8]F. Herman, Views of Jews: Antisemitism, Hollywood, and American Jews, 1913-1947 (Brandeis University Press, 2002). The ADL began making calls for the wholesale banning of the film, and then, in December, a three-page ADL ‘shopping list’ of proposed cuts and alterations arrived in DeMille’s office. Among the demands were:

  • Eliminate all scenes of the lashing of Jesus barring the first.
  • In the scene where a Jew, in answer to the question, ‘What evil has he done?’ shrugs his shoulders and jingles a coin, eliminate the jingling of the coin.
  • In the scene where Pilate washes his hands and puts the responsibility for the crucifixion on Caiaphas, let Caiaphas say “I assume the responsibility …”
  • Tone down the crucifixion.

The ADL also demanded that the film open with a foreword explaining that “the Jews were no longer an independent people,” and that all legal decisions at the time of Christ were ultimately the responsibility of the Romans. Coinciding with the arrival of the ADL “shopping list,” MGM announced that it would not release the film in eastern European countries “where it might inflame existing prejudices against the Jewish community.”[9]K.R. Phillips, Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America (Praeger, 2008),139.

DeMille’s will collapsed. In January 1928 a new version of the film was announced and released, incorporating the changes demanded by the ADL and others. By March 1929, DeMille was telling the Jewish Daily Bulletin that he regretted ever making the film. Even with the large number of changes, remarks Steven Carr, subsequent showings of the film

were subject to everything from accompanying benevolent ministerial statements to outright censorship. For example, in 1937 when the film was shown to churches in California, two entire reels were censored. The deleted scenes involved Judas accepting the bribe, the betrayal of Jesus, mob scenes, the activities of the high priest, and the Crucifixion itself. Before the film, a minister was to make a statement “completely exonerating the Jews” from any responsibility for the Crucifixion.[10]S. A. Carr, Hollywood and Anti-Semitism: A Cultural History up to World War II (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 81.

The ADL used the battle over King of Kings to establish a permanent relationship with the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors Association (MPPDA). Thereafter, the MPPDA (1915–1936) would facilitate an “official Jewish representative” appointed by the ADL who would liaise with the MPPDA and enable the ADL to screen any film for anti-Semitism before release to the public.

Legacy

One of the most remarkable features of the battle over King of Kings is the extent to which the entire affair was subject to the grossest of exaggerations. Even for its time, the film was remarkably tame, and of course it had been thoroughly sanitized by DeMille prior to release. The severity of Jewish reactions therefore suggests one of two possibilities, or perhaps a combination of both. In the first instance, it’s clear that Jews have a strong fear of the portrayal of Jews in the Gospel stories in their unadulterated form, a fear that resurfaced on the release of Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ. In my own personal interactions with Jews over the years, I’ve constantly observed a strong and deep-seated unease when Christianity is discussed. In the realm of scholarship, it’s commonplace in Jewish historiography to see anti-Semitism portrayed as fundamentally theological in origin, despite a wealth of evidence suggesting far greater socio-economic influence in the development of anti-Jewish attitudes. Many Jews, engaged in self-deception, probably do believe that the New Testament is the sole reason why they have experienced hostility. In the context of such anxieties, no matter how misplaced, it should come as little surprise that Jews would react with extreme horror towards any representation of the New Testament, and especially any representation of the trial and execution of Jesus.

On the other hand, much of the Jewish behavior surrounding this episode appears extremely calculated and well-organized. Relations between the MPPDA and the ADL were already embryonic prior to the filming of King of Kings, and there is some reason to suspect that the entire episode was exaggerated in order to manufacture a crisis that demanded a response (greater formal Jewish involvement in the censorship of mass media). There is of course a possibility that Jewish fear and Jewish ambition have merged in this instance.

Reading much of the material relating to the King of Kings controversy, I found myself quite disturbed on realizing that much of contemporary Christianity resembles DeMille’s butchered film. Almost everything that gave it some teeth in past centuries has been excised, leaving for the most part a rather toothless brute that is a tame lapdog scared of its own shadow. Yes, Christianity, excepting a few corners of resistance, has been censored. It’s been rendered safe. It’s been declared “Jew-friendly.” Most importantly, it looks nothing like its original form, its ‘Director’s Cut’ so to speak. The fact that Jews even feel secure enough to now demand that the New Testament should come printed with “anti-Semitism warnings” really says it all.

The King of Kings censorship campaign also highlights the unique relationship that Jews have with censorship. Cultural censorship, of course, is not limited to Jews, and calls to limit speech or expression have also been common among Jews and Christians. The difference is that Christians in the twentieth century were often most heavily involved in attempts to limit or remove obscenity in culture, whereas Jews were most often leading the battle to advance the same obscenity in the name of “free expression.” American Christians, and Catholics in particular via organizations like the National League of Decency, often campaigned for censorship on behalf of abstract moral values like decency and modesty rather than for themselves as a church or a people. Jewish involvement in censorship, on the other hand, is without exception always self-interested. As mentioned above, Jews are extremely liberal in their advocacy for the freedom to view or consume material regarded as morally destructive, but have been nothing less than relentless in their pursuit of legal methodologies and other forms of pressure designed to limit any speech or activity that would bring them into criticism or otherwise harm their interests as a group.

The episode has clear parallels with our contemporary situation. Many of the tactics pioneered in the Ford-DeMille years remain in place a century later. Blackmail, spying, boycotts, and behind the scenes pressure remain the mainstays of the ADL’s tactical bag of tricks. The old MPPDA-ADL partnership sees its postmodern equivalent in the form of Big Tech companies that allow the ethnically solipsistic fanatics of the ADL to declare what is or is not hateful content that should be censored from public view.

If I have a lasting frustration with the King of Kings story, it is that millions of Americans stood and watched as a tiny hostile minority—a minority that had not attained anywhere near the power they would achieve in later decades and had only recently lost their campaign against the 1924 immigration restriction law—dictated what they could and could not see on a subject no less than what is supposed to be, for most of them, their most sacred scriptures. This was at a time when the ADL’s power in relation to DeMille’s involved considerable bluffing, as they themselves conceded in some of the Jewish correspondence of the period. The sheer gutlessness of that generation which collapsed in the face of Jewish pressure left a heavier burden for the subsequent generation, and that burden has been getting heavier ever since. Censorship brings a multitude of victories for the censor. What is truth if it can’t be spoken?

Notes

[1] Cited in S. Eyman, Empire of Dreams: The Epic Life of Cecil B. DeMille (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010).

[2] D. D. Moore, B’nai B’rith and the Challenge of Ethnic Leadership (New York: State University of New York Press, 1981), 115.

[3] Eyman, Empire of Dreams.

[4] Ibid.

[5] For an interesting perspective on the casting of the Schildkraut’s see A.K. Koslovic, “The Deep Focus Casting of Joseph Schildkraut as Judas Figure in Four DeMille Films,” Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 6 (2004).

[6] J. Weissman, Set in Stone: America’s Embrace of the Ten Commandments (Oxford University Press, 2017), 40.

[7] M. Bernstein (ed), Controlling Hollywood: Censorship and Regulation in the Radio Era (Athlone, 2000), 80.

[8] F. Herman, Views of Jews: Antisemitism, Hollywood, and American Jews, 1913-1947 (Brandeis University Press, 2002).

[9] K.R. Phillips, Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America (Praeger, 2008),139.

[10] S. A. Carr, Hollywood and Anti-Semitism: A Cultural History up to World War II (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 81.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 135 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. songbird says:

    I think one of the greatest historical mistakes of the West was allowing Jewish control over Hollywood which led to a censorship of the idea of competing ethnic civilizations over the world, or even ethnic stereotypes. The 1923 film Safety Last, produced by non-Jew Hal Roach had an amusing scene that mocked the alien influence of Jewish jewelers, promoting their wares in the name of love. But it wasn’t long before this sort of thing vanished and there was an unwritten rule not to insult ethnics. I only saw one Fu Manchu movie, but, as I recall, he had black henchmen, and they didn’t play up the angle of civilizational struggle, which was the main theme of the pulps.

    In Middle School, I had to read this awful book called Chernowitz. It was about a Jewish kid being bullied, and they called him “Christ-killer.” Even then, I found it to be really bizarre and ethnically paranoiac.

    Though interestingly in Ireland there was a tradition on St. Stephen’s Day of hunting a wren and killing it. According to local legend, a noisy wren betrayed St. Stephen while he was hiding from the Jews. Though, probably the custom is pagan in origin and naturally fell on the saint’s day. In any case, it is another instance showing how ridiculous the term “Judeo-Christian” is.

    • Agree: Annony Mouse
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Marckus
    , @Leo Den
  2. Jewish cultural censorship today:

    [MORE]

    Anybody here willing to take them on?

  3. Judeo Christian is mutually exclusive. Puzzling however is Jews do not KNOW the Old Testament. Psalms 22 and Isaiah 7:14 and again Isaiah 53 along with Zechariah 11:14 make clear reference to Christ’s coming. When HE came –they tossed him out of the synagogue —were very angry when he turned over the tables in synagogee yelling “You have made my Father’s house a den of thieves” and lastly —Jews had a choice but chose Barabbas ——and Barabbas’s father can be found at Isaiah 11:13. Does anyone know how John Hagee is doing —he’s got Covid -19 and Netanyahu tweeted “Israel has no better friend than John Hagee!” Donald Trump –Pompeo Blinken Amtrak Joe – Bolton Cotton Cruz –are you listening?

  4. Jewish supremacists have to perpetuate the myth that ‘anti-Semitism’ is completely irrational, and if that fails, they prefer to claim to be the victims of the Christ-killer blood libel.

    They can knock down both of these straw men by appeals to reason.

    What really scares them is having their greed, deceptions, conspiracies, hypocrisy, aggression, and lust for power over others pointed out. It scares them because it is unassailable truth.

  5. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Hypocrisy is the fundamental character description of Jews as a Tribe.

    Christ rebuked them for their hypocrisy, in the extreme.

    Even to this day, the outrageous hypocrisy (((chutzpah))) that Jews exhibit is breathtaking.

    They have no shame.

    Nothing is ever enough.

    Truth never matters.

    Their hatred of all others is never to subside.

    No matter how Philosemitic any Goy is, it will never be enough.

    Jews… Evil, Unredeemable.

    Christ Himself could not Redeem (((them)))… so their is no way to change their Satanic nature.

    • Replies: @aj54
  6. TGD says:

    I’ve never seen DeMille’s King of Kings as I don’t much like grainy silent black and white movies (I make an exception for Sergei Eisenstein’s 1927 film, Battleship Potemkin).

    I did like Nicholas Ray’s kosherized 1961 remake of King of Kings. The film score by Hungarian composer Miklos Rózsa is one of most lush and sweeping ever turned out by Hollywood. You came out of the theater smiling unlike Mel Gibson’s, The Passion of the Christ which experience was like being punched in the gut.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
    , @Liza
    , @Alden
  7. @TGD

    I’ve never seen DeMille’s King of Kings as I don’t much like grainy silent black and white movies

    You’re missing out. Yes, paying attention to subtitles is annoying, but I started playing the film once for free on YouTube, thinking I’d only watch a little bit, and had to stay and watch the entire huge run time. It is mesmerizing, a triumph of art and cinema, absolutely riveting. Yes, I’m using every cliche from the movie critics book, but it is that darn good.

    You came out of the theater smiling unlike Mel Gibson’s, The Passion of the Christ which experience was like being punched in the gut.

    How one could have this reaction to one of the greatest movies of this century and certainly one of the top three Jesus movies ever is beyond comprehension.

  8. Thomasina says:

    Another excellent article. It’s just another example of people giving in to (((them))) , isn’t it? They just keep at it and at it until people finally acquiesce. Guilt you, shame you, boycott you, threaten you. Of course, each time they’re successful, their power just increases and the noose gets tightened some more. Until you’re strangled and can no longer speak up.

    So they own the media, entertainment, publishing, banking, government, social media. They control the voice. Now they want to moderate what we get to say. Who’s monitoring what they get to say?

    “The US government’s war on political dissent is being guided by private left-wing and Zionist organizations, National Justice can report.

    An internal document regarding the Pentagon’s “Countering Extremism Working Group” (CEWG) from last April names the individuals and groups that are slated for membership in a subcommittee that specializes in setting targets for the Defense Department, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice’s war on conservative and nationalist leaning Americans.

    While the FBI, DHS and Defense Department have discredited themselves domestically and globally, their desperation should not be ignored. If the ADL and SPLC get to decide what constitutes “domestic extremism,” the new post-legal era of rampant government abuse is only getting started.”

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/federal-governments-domestic-extremism-committee-is-being-run-by-the-adl-and-splc-leaked-documents-show/

    Surely there must be some excellent retired lawyers out there who would be willing to step up and assist in suing these organizations. It’s time to fight back.

    They’re right out in the open now and they’re upping their game. If we don’t speak up now, we’ll all be speaking Yiddish.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Craig Nelsen
  9. the king of the jews is a mad dog.

  10. Liza says:
    @TGD

    I wonder if it really is “grainy” if you get the 2-discs King of Kings from Criterion.

    “New, restored digital transfers of both versions of The King of Kings: DeMille’s 155-minute roadshow version and his subsequent 112-minute general release”

    https://www.criterion.com/films/949-the-king-of-kings

    • Replies: @Sarah
    , @TGD
  11. Great article. Many people blame boomers, but really they were just victims. The people of the early 1900s are most to blame for letting the Jews run roughshod. Henry Ford receives a lot of credit, but he was insanely wealthy and powerful yet he still let the Jews win.

  12. Ktulu says:
    @GomezAdddams

    You Christians and your delusions about prophecies. Get two Christ-cucks in a room and they still won’t agree with whay the magic jews meant when they made this or that pronouncement. The world doesn’t need your brand of psychosis, it never did and it still doesn’t, now go back to your rubber room.

    • Replies: @Fr. John
  13. Ktulu says:

    Jews over-reacted. How unsurprising. I think the most interesting lesson to take from this is actually the fine tuning jewsish lobbying has undergone throughout the last century. Perhaps now in the “great reset” (the great, final temper tantrum) we might see such undiplomatic screeching come back but I imagine none of this accomplished anything at the time but help anti-semites. Now it is their strategy to sit calmly and allow rightfully angry people to look unreasonable but I imagine failing to keep a lid on such wanton vitriol would have helped the return of anti-semitism even in the 1990s. It really is a wonder how such a crowd of psychos kept themselves in line over the last 100 years long enough to accomplish anything other than a for real holocaust.

    I think the results of this fiasco also speak to the true effectiveness of Christian anti-semitism. Fast forward fifteen years and the segment of the population this film most appealed to was firebombing German civillians and murdering the greatest heros of the white race. Christians are pions, you can’t even really be a good Christian without taking pride in that fact. The greatest Christians will always go where the crowd goes and therefore the religion isnt a bulwark against anything other than convincing normal people to strive for mastery.

  14. It’s strange that the jews at the time were worried that the movie would portray them on the screen as in the bible, when every person who was familiar with the biblical story of the crucifixion and owned a bible could read it for themselves. Did they think that seeing it on the screen would make their reputation any worse among christians?

  15. Cecil B. DeMille’s backlot set for the 1927 film King Of Kings

    [MORE]

    Where was later built the set for Gone With The Wind

    Whose buildings became Andy Griffith’s town of Mayberry

  16. Franz says:

    The sheer gutlessness of that generation which collapsed in the face of Jewish pressure left a heavier burden for the subsequent generation, and that burden has been getting heavier ever since.

    Still every generation, with whatever it has, fights back with whatever they have to work with at the time.

    Even DeMille was to hit back with The Sign of the Cross, an “anti-pagan” film that scandalized the first years of the sound era. It was interpreted (at the time and by sharp viewers ever since) by showing the Romans as the chief rootless cosmopolitans of their era.

    The 1961 remake of King of Kings (by Samuel Bronson that only uses the name) got a boycott from the Catholic Legion of Decency and pastors even made Sunday sermons blasting the anti-Gospel nature of the film. Bronson’s film under-performed, as they say now, proof that at least Catholics knew how to hit back in the first year of JFK.

    A decade later, Jesus Christ Superstar, an “opera” made by a down-at-heels group of Brits, became an unexpected hit in North America. The rabbis were up at arms again, the “opera” took the Gospel of John as the source with wonderfully predictable results. The characterizations of Herod and Caiaphas are both entertaining and true to John’s gospel.

    Things went limp till Mel came along. But it’s understood that the case of Superstar was a classic example of under-the-radar hit-making. It was too small to bother with till it suddenly became too big to ignore. Aspiring entertainers might want to take a page out of that odd production’s history. They ended up filming it in Israel for reasons that make no sense at all. And like Mel’s performers, the stars of the 70s version never got meaningful work again.

    Victories are possible. It can be done because it has been done. For a great look at DeMille’s The Sign of the Cross, for those who haven’t heard of the 1932 picture with the infamous Lesbian Dance,
    this is a fine article:

    The Wickedest Movie in the World: How Cecil B. DeMille Made The Sign of the Cross

    https://brightlightsfilm.com/wickedest-movie-world-cecil-b-demille-made-sign-cross/

  17. Howbeit no man spake openly of Him for fear of the Jews.
    – St. John 7:13

    End Judeo Lese Majeste
    Down with Pax Judaica
    Register ADL, AIPAC, etc. as a foreign agents.
    &
    Stay tuned in with the Giz Maxwell/Lex Wexner/Mossad blackmailing case. Who has got the VIP name index for all the videos? How did the Zionists leverage these VIPs trapped in their web?

    Americans want to know.

    • Agree: Annony Mouse
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  18. neutral says:

    Anybody who still says that jews do not run America are either incredibly stupid or secretly accept it but too afraid to say it.

    • Agree: Irish Savant, HdC
  19. Dumbo says:

    Haven’t seen it. Perhaps I will, one day. Not a big fan of that type of movie, but perhaps it’s good.

    So far, from the little I’ve seen, I think De Mille’s best work might be his acting role in Sunset Boulevard.

    DeMille thus comes across as an opportunist, who identified with his own success more than any ethnic cause or group, and who could simultaneously hold deep ambivalence about his Jewish background while understanding that this uncomfortable fact would be useful for his career in an industry that operated like a Jewish cousinhood.

    Why should one blame Mr. De Mille for talking about his Jewish blood credentials in order to work in a heavily Jewish industry, while privately disliking Jews and not identifying as a Jew? Not everyone is as “pure and blameless” as Mr. Joyce wants them to, sometimes people have to compromise.

    Lots of people today pretend to believe all that “woke” crap even if not believing a word of it, just in order not to lose their jobs. It’s a harsh world out there.

  20. robwin says:

    I can recall as a young boy in parochial grade school when we, the entire student body, were shown this movie. I still recall the scene depicting the woman taken in adultery. The entire mob left when Jesus said, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone”. One man lingered behind until Jesus writing in the dirt wrote the word “adulterer”, referring to the lingerer. Then he, too, departed, shocked and embarrassed.

    That memory may not contribute much to any discussion about the film, but it has stayed with me all these years. This was in the 1950s, btw.

  21. This crypto-Jewish manifesto was then signed by, among others, President Wilson and former President Taft, before being published to a gullible public.

    There is quite rightly outrage at how Jews have destroyed “the west”.

    But it has been and still is very easy for them.
    They must be privately very much amazed at how easy.
    Wasn’t it the “conservative” Wilson who even signed over control of America’s money to them, no dispute, no quibble, just gave it to them ?

    Amazing.
    Except that it’s true, it would be unbelievable.

    And, of course, it hasn’t stopped there …

  22. anon[122] • Disclaimer says:
    @songbird

    Christians are Jews.

    Premise 1: Only Jews celebrate the child-sacrifice ritual Passover.
    Premise 2: “Christ our Passover lamb is sacrificed.”
    Conclusion: “Inside every Christian is a Jew.” (The Pope said that.) Christians = Jews.

    Oh how the Jew doesn’t like being named!

  23. Sarah says:
    @Liza

    I wonder if it really is “grainy” if you get the 2-discs King of Kings from Criterion.

    “New, restored digital transfers of both versions of The King of Kings: DeMille’s 155-minute roadshow version and his subsequent 112-minute general release”

    https://www.criterion.com/films/949-the-king-of-kings

    So it possible to get the original uncensored 155 mn 1927 version and the 122 mn 1928 version.

    • Agree: Liza
  24. Z-man says:
    @GomezAdddams

    Judeo Christian, an oxymoron of the first order probably coined by some Jew instructor at CCNY back in the 1930’s.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  25. Anonymous[122] • Disclaimer says:
    @thotmonger

    Also, same Jewish author: “Salvation is from the Jews.” -St. John 4:22

    Christianity is a Jewish millstone around the neck of white folks. Cherry picking the very few anti-Jewish phrases inserted—while ignoring the far more numerous pro-Jewish passages—is utter dishonesty. For example, America’s foreign policy was written in Romans 15:27, “The Goyim (Gentiles) owe it$$$ to the Jews.”

    You were born right the first time, it’s OK to be born White. 👌

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @Hans
    , @Anonymous
  26. Eventually, society (and better Bibles), will drop the recent abbreviation “Jew”, which is for Judean. Judea is not a country now, and most who call themselves “Jews” were not born in Judea (or Palestine). They should be called Talmudists. And there is plenty to criticize about in the Talmud. Also, to be dropped in the future is the term “anti-Semitic”. This is the biggest lie of those who call themselves Jews. As Arabs are a Semitic people and no one hates or kills more Arabs than Jews (Israelis). Which again, makes them hypocrites. Nothing has changed about their chief characteristic, hypocrisy, in 2000 years. Another point is the race issue. Those who claim to be against racism, teach it, by teaching evolution. If they read evolutionists, they would see that is the foundation for racism. And the antidote to racism, is creationism, which they outlaw. So, all the left liberals who scream against racism, are really insane racists (and hypocrites), when they ban creationism. By being called Talmudists, those who claim to be Jews that are atheists will not be entitled to that name.

    • Agree: aj54
    • Replies: @thotmonger
  27. Don’t worry they were all black , oooga boooga… Kang of Kangz

    • Replies: @Marckus
  28. Emslander says:
    @Anonymous

    The thing is that Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, God become man, is as rejected by modern Christians as he has ever been by Jews. Go into a Catholic or mainline Protestant Church on Sunday and tell them that Christ said, “Take up your cross,” and you’ll be tossed.

    Christ tells us all that our lovely materialistic worldliness is the enemy of His followers. “You are not of this World.”

    Nobody wants to hear that, so modern Christians call themselves “Judeo-Christian” so that they can be the sweet-smelling cowards at the back of the crowd screaming “Crucify Him,” while the Jews lead the charge. The modern Christian washes his hands of the matter.

    • Replies: @dindunuffins
    , @Neuday
  29. Defeating this particular enemy requires strategy and a scalpel. Highlight the intrinsic lack of value wrought by the nonsense being promoted. If enough people agree it’s harmful they will instinctively seek its source to shut it down.

    (((They))) are not invincible. 109 times (actually many more) people had enough. There is a breaking point.

    To paraphrase a meme: If they didn’t fear (y)our power, they wouldn’t be trying so hard to stop it.

    • Agree: aj54, Nancy
  30. Miro23 says:

    The sheer gutlessness of that generation which collapsed in the face of Jewish pressure left a heavier burden for the subsequent generation, and that burden has been getting heavier ever since.

    At some point problems have to be fixed.

    On solution would be to completely abandon the current zombified version of pseudo-Christianity and get back to the solid and simple faith of the early Christians. They were persecuted – but at the same time could handle it – and it strengthened their faith.

    It’s risky to draw parallels, but they found community survival through personally living clean and ethical lives (against the background of spectacular sleaze and corruption of the late Roman Empire).

    Useful source: Robin Lane Fox “Pagans and Christians” Harper Collins 1988. Not an easy read but v. good.

    • Agree: aj54
  31. Marckus says:
    @songbird

    I think one of the greatest historical mistakes of the West was allowing Jewish control over Hollywood

    I disagree. You dont know how many thousands of dollars I saved by not going to the movies to look at their shit.

    • LOL: Sarah, Montefrío
    • Replies: @Montefrío
  32. @Cliff Sullivan

    You think he is telling the truth now?

  33. Marckus says:

    Jew that and Jew the Other. But I say JEW THIS ! LOL

    Its amusing to watch all this Jew hatred and yet people flock to the movies, ogle their stupid shows on TV for several hours and line up at the movies to fork over their hard earned money to look at sheer baloney for 90 minutes or so and inundate Disney World.

    Do you really need to buy that geegaw via Amazon ? Do you need to post a photo of your Pangolin roast and Bat Soup with tofu and mixed vegetables on Instagram, do you need to complain about your small dick and almost invisible nuts on Facebook ? Biff, Yee, Dan D and Mulgo Jumbo please take note…….

    Want to clip their wings ? Stop supporting the industries that make them rich. This will never happen of course so the sensible among us must continue to endure these endless complaints. If you give them the whip dont complain if they use it across your back !

  34. I’ll leave it to God to deal with Talmudic Jewry. “…weeping and gnashing of teeth,” maybe?

  35. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    While the FBI, DHS and Defense Department have discredited themselves domestically and globally, their desperation should not be ignored. If the ADL and SPLC get to decide what constitutes “domestic extremism,” the new post-legal era of rampant government abuse is only getting started.”…

    Surely there must be some excellent retired lawyers out there who would be willing to step up and assist in suing these organizations. It’s time to fight back.

    It is always embarrassing to hear conservatives put faith in a totally rigged judicial system. “If we only had good legal representation!” Seriously? Are they really that naive??

    Yeah, they can fight it in the United States District Court for D.C. I’m sure they’ll find the courts will be fair if not sympathetic. Maybe Judge Amy Berman Jackson will rule in their favor? Or Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle? Or Judge Paul Friedman? Or maybe they’ll get Judge Amit Mehta, born in Gujarat, India? Or one of the black judges (Stepin Fetchits proxy warriors of the Jews).

    All American institutions are now corrupt beyond redemption. DOJ/FBI, courts, intelligence agencies, federal law enforcement, NIH, CDC, universities, et al. Trusting in any of them is like going to the head of security at The Firm to reveal ongoing corruption in the company.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  36. @Joe Paluka

    The point is that the portrayal of Jesus and the Disciples (the good guys) with Gentile looking actors isn’t fair. Jews can be good guys or bad guys depending on the choices they make, as it is with everyone. Jesus and his original followers weren’t Gentiles. They were Jews who rebelled against the ruling elites of Rome and the Sanhedrin. Gibson’s portrayal, which is an ethnically more authentic portrayal, seems to convey this message far better.

    • LOL: Marckus
    • Replies: @Disagreet
    , @Malla
  37. Marckus says:
    @dindunuffins

    King of Kings seems to be a good movie so I am told.

    I went to a stag back in the late 70’s when the movies were all 8mm/ 9mm ?? The organizers sent out a survey asking the attending perverts which movie they preferred.

    1. King of Kings
    2. King of the Mandingos
    3. Queen of the Chicks with Dicks

    The consensus was King of Kings ! However the fellows I was with had tastes that were more intellectual, more subliminal, so to speak and we chose #2 and #3. We were all practising Catholics you see.

    Moses should have saved his tablet and the burning bush to barbecue some lamb, tenderising it with his hammer and chisel and to boot, saved the exhausting trip down the mountain. I have gotten the impression that men wake up every morning, check out the commandments, and then decide which one to break.

    Its a strange world we live in. King of Kings or not, the Messiah ain’t returning here to judge the wicked. There is not enough room in Hell and the besides, the Devil wants to maintain his position as King of the Hill.

    As was pointed out to me in my youth, Christ was crucified with and between two criminals. If the Juice were responsible I dont blame them one bit. Always, always cut out the middle man, eliminate the competition. There must be a moral or a lesson there somewhere !

  38. @Emslander

    Made damn sure that Pilate
    Washed his hands and sealed his fate

    Pleased to meet you
    Hope you guess my name
    But what’s puzzling you
    Is the nature of my game

  39. AH88 says:

    The origins of Jewish cultural subversion is Christianity. Prior to Christianity race mixing wasn’t really a thing with Whites because our ancestral Gods like Thor were pro White and forbid it. Once Whites accepted being ruled over by Jews because the Bible says “there is no Greek or jew” and “salvation is for those who bless the jews” it was all downhill for our race. It’s long past time we stopped tolerating anyone who shills for abrahamic religions which were invented by the Jews to separate Whites from the masculine anti Semitic gods of their forefathers.

  40. Neuday says:
    @Emslander

    The thing is that Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, God become man, is as rejected by modern Christians as he has ever been by Jews. Go into a Catholic or mainline Protestant Church on Sunday and tell them that Christ said, “Take up your cross,” and you’ll be tossed.

    I can’t speak about Protestants, but in Catholicism “taking up your cross” is huge. There are many problems in modern Catholicism, but to say you’ll be tossed my mentioning the role of the cross in daily life is absolutely incorrect. We even have hymns about it.

  41. Typical hysterical Jewish over-reaction to any form of criticism no matter how veiled. This over-the-top response seems to have been working well for some time but surely it has to elicit a negative reaction at some point?

  42. TGD says:
    @Liza

    This quote is taken from the Criterion release publicity:

    The King of Kings is at once spectacular and deeply reverent—part Gospel, part Technicolor epic. The Criterion Collection is proud to present this beloved film in a two-disc edition featuring both the 112-minute general-release version and the rarely seen 155-minute cut that premiered at the grand opening of Grauman’s Chinese Theatre.

    Technicolor in 1927? Criterion must be confusing deMille’s movie with Nicholas Ray’s. Ray shot his movie in 70mm technicolor and motion picture high fidelity. Black and white movies are really pantomimes. Ray’s film is a faithful adaptation of the Gospels with narration by the inimitable Orson Wells and sublime music by Miklós Rózsa . Overture linked below.

    • Replies: @Liza
  43. Hans says:
    @Anonymous

    Dat’s so true. The jews have utterly failed in their attempts to sell Christianity to us.

    Despite their relentless efforts, the public has turned away.

    Can’t argue with the FACT that we’re doing incredibly well without that millstone – just look at the advance of the culture in the last couple of decades.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Gg Mo
  44. Disagreet says:
    @Niebelheim

    “Jesus and his original followers weren’t Gentiles”

    How do you know? We don’t really know what happened back then and there, just what the gospels which are propaganda say. But even though the gospels want to propagandize us into believing that Jesus is Jewish, even they give some hints that he is not actually.

    Jesus and all his disciples are from Galilee which in the Old Testament is literally called “Galilee of the Gentiles” and Matthew quotes it:

    Matthew 4:15 “The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim, by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, GALILEE OF THE GENTILES;”

    Isaiah 9:1-2 “Nevertheless the dimness shall not be such as was in her vexation, when at the first he lightly afflicted the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali, and afterward did more grievously afflict her by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, in GALILEE OF THE NATIONS. 2 The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.”

    The quote doesn’t seem to have much to do with what Matthew in his propaganda wants us to believe it does (i.e. a so-called Messiah of the Jews, which is actually NEVER promised in the Old Testament and is merely Rabbinic Folklore).

    But even so, it shows that Jesus’ native stomping grounds was Gentile territory, even back in the Old Testament!

    • Replies: @Niebelheim
  45. R2b says:

    Don’t they boast about it in the Talmud, or have I got that completely wrong?

    • Replies: @Hans
  46. Excellent article.

    Has anyone noticed that all the trouble makers are from organizations that produce nothing full of people incapable of producing anything.

    Our problems today stem from the completely non productive in the society. The lawyers, psychologists, sociologists, psychiatrists, gender advocates, race hustlers, politicians, clergy, etc. A massive portion of the population is parasitising the people that actually make the society function and their only contribution is always negative.

    All the people that can’t be shown to produce something tangible should be shunned by those that do. It’s all the phony ‘professions’ and institutions that need to disappear. The folks that run the ADL, the World Bank, the UN, etc are con artists. They have no skills. Their organizations were created to employ the otherwise unemployable.

    • Agree: Alden, HdC, ebear
    • Replies: @Realist
  47. Fascinating work Andrew. Thank you for the context you provide. Your context connects the dots of the Kennedy assassinations, 9/11, and the USS Liberty as the tightening of the noose as Thomasina mentioned. The level of fear but also of detestation of Jesus and Christianity astounds me. The recent events in Gaza make me wonder if Christians might take a similar approach to Talmudic supremacy. Hamas attacked where Israel was weak. In Enemy of the State, Gene Hackman talks about in guerilla warfare you use your weaknesses as strengths. If they’re big and you’re little, then you’re fast and they’re slow. You’re hidden and they’re exposed. You fight only the battles you know you can win. I think that has been the Palestinian method for this round and it has been successful.

  48. anarchyst says:
    @Z-man

    We have to get away from the “judeo-Christian” mindset…
    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments are a good guide which proscribes certain behaviors, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”.
    That my work fine for jews, as they have their supremacist “Talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.
    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls (goyim), only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.
    In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud. In addition, the jewish Talmud condones pedophilia, allowing lecherous old jews to rape children as long as they are “three years and a day” of age.

    [MORE]

    The barbaric practice of circumcision (male genital mutilation) is also suspect, the mohel fellating the infant after the “deed is done” passing on (who knows what) STDs to the infant. Sick…
    In fact, every jewish “holiday” (holy day) is based on the celebration of genocide and destruction of gentiles.
    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” country.
    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.
    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with (their) God was then “null and void”.
    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.
    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.
    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.
    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.
    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ and TOOK FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOING SO.
    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.
    As is the case, even today, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution? (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way).
    It makes absolutely no sense at all.
    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.
    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.
    In a perverse sort of way, israel’s favorite “war song” is “Onward Christian Soldiers”
    There…I’ve said it…

    • Agree: Z-man, Nancy
    • Replies: @Vocal Pelican
  49. Hans says:
    @R2b

    Jesus is in hell, boiling in “hot excrement” – Gittin 57a.
    Christ is called a bastard. Rabbi Joshua said he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a woman’s menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said he is both a bastard and a son of a niddah. – Kallah 51a.
    Jesus’ mother was a whore – Sanhedrin 106a

    Marching to Zion has some great clips of jews explaining. Well worth the time – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8ErMMc2ASM

    • Replies: @R2b
  50. The real sadness here is that Jesus the Christ came to earth to be the sacrifice for our sins. He came, for His own people, and paid the penalty for our sin.. which is death. No thinking, rational Christian could believe that ‘the Jews’ thwarted HIS plan (of redemption) He had(s) for us. It was MY sin that Jesus died for.. He suffered and died because of what I did, MY sins. He suffered and hung on a cross because of what I did.. not because of what Romans or Jews did to Him.

    Not only was He willing to do this.. He came to earth SPECIFICALLY to do it.

    This is the demonstration of love He has for His people

    • Agree: Katrinka, aj54
  51. HT says:

    Today’s Jewish censorship is the product of decades of conditioning and propaganda that has resulted in a culture where any criticism of Jews is no longer tolerated. Just say anything negative about the Jews to anyone, regardless of their political persuasion and you will receive a sharp rebuke and you will immediately be associated with Hitler or the KKK. It is actually amazing how Jews have accomplished this form of mind control over society through media and academia.

    • Replies: @anon
  52. I have no desire to defend the ADL, but when a writer talks of “censorship” and then talks about criticism, efforts to persuade, etc., I get the impression he is loose with the facts as well as with the terminology.

  53. Leo Den says:
    @songbird

    DeMille was confused.

    Today’s converted Jews are NOT the Israelites of the bible.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/are-jews-the-israelites-of-the-bible/

    • Replies: @Blissex
  54. anon[825] • Disclaimer says:
    @HT

    It is actually amazing how Jews have accomplished this form of mind control over society through media and academia.

    Plus massive collective pressure on individuals, manipulating,
    corrupting, perverting our legal system. And dirty tactics.

    • Agree: Alfred Muscaria
  55. Speaking of (((Yentob))) approved censorship at our state broadcaster, I wonder if Martin Bashir (malevolent darky) has been moonlighting as Channel 5 head of history.

    Anne Boleyn was an African!!!!!!

    RIP Max Mosley

    • Replies: @Rogue
  56. The sheer gutlessness of that generation which collapsed in the face of Jewish pressure left a heavier burden for the subsequent generation

    Ford especially. He now has negro great grandkids. Well done Henry.

  57. @Marckus

    Good point. The last time I saw a movie in a theater was in ’04: The Passion of the Christ. I’m not a Christian (although born one), but I support the old Catholic culture that was the post-fall-of-Rome foundation of Western European culture and civilization. The movie was brilliant imho. The androgynous Satan was the best portrayal of that character I’ve ever seen. The purse-throwing scene with the purse being thrown toward the viewer was another coup de main.

    The Jewish fuss about the movie was ridiculaous and insulting and entirely wrong. There were no “anti-semitic” outrages, no pogroms, but in my case their incessant whining had me halfway wishing there had been. Where I live, there are three Jews that live here, perhaps more whom I don’t know. No one here is hostile to them, everyone is civil toward them, but no one is friendly with them either; we and they all understand why that is.

  58. gotmituns says:

    TikToker sings for Palestine – TRT World

    https://www.trtworld.com/video/social-videos/…

    TikToker sings for Palestine – TRT World

    May 20, 2021 · Israel-Palestine Tensions: Egypt-mediated ceasefire reached in Gaza. US to ban TikTok video app. UN rejects measure condemning Hamas. Another Friday, another
    ————————————————————————
    This may seemingly be off topic but not really. Everything to do with jews is the same, lousy. This is a pretty good video about Palestine.

  59. @Dennis Gannon

    Divine origin does not rule out the phenomena of common ancestry and change (by evolution) over time. The evidence for the miracle of creation is ample. So is evidence of our very ancient origins and the plasm that link humanity not only with each other but with the entire fabric of life that mantles this planet.

    These are compatible views, neither need stir up doctrines of racism.

    The antidote to the ADL is to expose their crimes and treason, and shutter it.
    The antidote to Zionist control of mass media is to break it up, and reapportion our air waves.
    The antidote to Judeo lese Majeste is to laugh it out of town. Welcome back those humans who admit they are just fellow humans.

    & Free Ursula Haverbeck. Etc. The sooner the better; the less atonement tax…


  60. aandrews says:

    I wonder if an original uncut, unexpurgated version still exists, tucked away in a safe somewhere?

  61. Agent76 says:

    May 22, 2021 Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss peaking in Jersey City

    Anti-Zionist Jews from Neturei Karta joining pro-Palestinian rally in Jersey City, New Jersey, on Fridays, May 21. Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss peaking.

    Jan 13, 2020 A timeline of U.S.-Iran relations The U.S. and Iran have a complicated history dating back decades.

    From the U.S. involvement in the shah’s 1953 coup of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddegh, to the Iran hostage crisis in 1979, to the U.S. killing of one of Iran’s top generals in January 2020, the U.S. and Iran’s conservative religious and political leaders have often found themselves in stark opposition to one another about their visions for both Iran’s own future and larger interests in the Middle East.

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/a-timeline-of-u-s-iran-relations

  62. Alden says:
    @TGD

    Gibson’s movie emphasized the horrors of torture and being crucified. It’s a horrible, humiliating and long lasting death. Why do you think Alexander the Great, Greeks and Romans used mass crucifixions after rebellions or when a city or tribe resisted conquest?

    That was the whole point of the movie.

    I read bound copies of the Dearborn Independent and other writings by Henry Ford when I worked in a university and used its library. Very enlightening.

    • Replies: @TGD
  63. Alden says:
    @Arthur MacBride

    Don’t forget that Wilson was a well known adulterer. He had a son by his main girl friend. Jew Sam Untermeyer, attorney for Standard Oil, used the affair and son to blackmail Wilson into WW1. Its reasonable to assume the son and adultery were used to blackmail Wilson into doing other things.

    Federal Rrserve yes Wilson did sign the law. But congress passed it. Had Wilson vetoed it, Aldrich and the rest would just have introduced and passed the bill again and again till Wilson or successor signed it.

    Politicians don’t just decide to run for city council mayor state assembly congress governor senate then president all by themselves. They are carefully selected by the elites.

    Wilson’s adultery was well known in the university community of Princeton. The elites, Jew or goyim don’t selects prrsidents they can’t control. Either by blackmail or bribery.,

    Current example Kamala Harris. She dropped out of the primaries very early because she lost to every candidate. And she was a strong law and order county prosecutor and state attorney general. Democrats are pro criminal ( as long as the criminal is black) Democrat’s hate district attorneys. Democrats elect pro criminal anti police anti victim district attorneys. Harris was just the opposite.

    So here’s a candidate whose entire career till she became a senator has been anti the democrat party pro criminal agenda. Then, for whatever reason, she’s just not appealing to voters. So she loses in the first primaries.

    But she’s picked for Vice President. There’s a theory that presidents elected in zero years due in office. FDR 1940 Kennedy 1960 maybe Biden 2020.

    Wilson was selected because he was vulnerable to blackmail. Others are selected young and poor. Plenty of Woodrow Wilson’s Kamala Harrises, in American history.

    The other thing is people often sign or endorse things without really knowing what’s really involved. There was a special election for state assembly in my district last week. Black republican won. Very liberal woman I know voted for the republican because she saw the picture on the mailings and voted for a black, assuming the black is a liberal democrat. Well, this was a black republican who is attorney for the Apartment House Owners Association.

    Petitions are always going around and people sign without really knowing what they are really about. For instance Keep Poor Minority Students In School. That sounds OK doesn’t it?
    Who wouldn’t sign that petition?

    What Keep Poor Minority Students in School really means is keep vicious dangerous thugs in regular schools. Instead of after conviction of assault and battery with great injury rape arson or whatever expel the dangerous thugs from regular schools., And send them to the continuation schools to keep the dangerous thugs away from the normal students. The keep minorities in school really means is abolish the expulsions and return the dangerous thugs to the regular schools.

    Any petition or law can be presented to sound reasonable. Help handicapped old people to vote. Translation mail in ballots signed by nursing home residents.

    • Agree: Thomasina
    • Replies: @Alfred Muscaria
  64. @Disagreet

    You are right. I really don’t know what Jesus’ ethnicity was. No one living does, assuming there really was a historical Jesus. My comment should be understood as contexted by the fable. Your citations to the fable are understood in the same light. But my point was that making the “good guys” look European and the “bad guys” Ashkenazi can is propaganda, just as blacks are depicted as “magical negroes” in so many of today’s movies. Same game.

  65. I can’t understand why Henry Ford backed down from the Jews? He was very wealthy, well known and respected. If anyone was in the position to damage the Jews and their nefarious plans, it was Ford. Very disappointing. History could have been different if he had a stronger spine.

    With Jews You Lose.

    • Replies: @aj54
  66. “The sheer gutlessness of that generation which collapsed in the face of Jewish pressure left a heavier burden for the subsequent generation, and that burden has been getting heavier ever since.”

    That’s the greatest tragedy of the Indo-European society!

  67. R2b says:
    @Hans

    Thank you, Hans!
    I was rethorical.
    Wasn’t there also a passage, were they boast of having him killed, or at least taking the blame?
    As I remember, also, they named some other method of execution.
    I also saw, was it Pastor Peter Andersson?, Marching to Zion. Very good!

    The article, to me, says, that the Church and Christians, should NEVER waver in its dogmas, based on Scripture!
    1 Thess. 2:15, ”Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets…”. Just think about what is said here. They killed Jesus Christ! And, their own Prophets!

    But, as they are the offspring of the Father of lies, how hard isn’t it to combat! So many disguises, such acting and deception. Despite that, I find it terribly curious, that so many so-called Christians support the Jewish millenna-deceptions.

    • Replies: @Hans
  68. Aglan says:

    Only this prayer will bring lasting peace:

    “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Father, send now Your Spirit over the earth.

    Let the Holy Spirit live in the hearts of all nations, that they may be preserved from degeneration, disaster and war.

    May the Lady of All Nations, who once was Mary, be our Advocate.

    Amen.”

    FYI: exactly ten years before communism came to an end in Eastern Europe in 1989, Pope John-Paul II made the following invocation during an outdoor Mass in Warsaw (June 2nd 1979):

    “And I cry—I who am a Son of the land of Poland and who am also Pope John Paul II—I cry from all the depths of this Millennium, I cry on the vigil of Pentecost:

    Let your Spirit descend.
    Let your Spirit descend.
    and renew the face of the earth,
    the face of this land.

    Amen.”

  69. I believe this piece has highlighted a specific reason as to why so many Christians, especially in the early 20th century, seemingly so easily caved to Jewish interests. And it is a reason no one wants to consider or probably has even tried to.

    Christians,to a certain degree, are somewhat more compassionate than the Jewish Community as can be seen by the many charities that Christians provide and support to all peoples, while Jewish Charities, for the most part are designed to primarily serve the Jewish Community.

    This disparity is due to the fact that Christians are more or less part of a cult while Jews are far more business and self-interested despite their claims of universal values in Judaism.

    When being part of a cult, you must be a believer and as such many Christians believe the fairy tales regarding Jesus Christ as much as they believe the fairy tales of the Old Testament that regale the Jews as the Chosen People and that their homeland is in Israel. Even the 1917 Balfour Declaration was predicated on such nonsense.

    This appears to be the crux of the matter. Where Jews do have segments of “true believers” they also have quite a percentage of hard-nosed business men who do what is best for them and the community at large. And of course there are also the secular members of the Jewish Community who may or may not be Zionist.

    If one views these differences with a critical, sociological eye and without any prr-conceived prejudices, it would be found to be quite obvious as to why the Jewish Community has become so successful over the decades; they simply use more logic than their Christian counterparts.

    If one wants to prevent the Jews from gaining so much capability in a society then one requires that an opposing, logical force be provided that can equitably balance the scales for all. Believing in Christian fairy tales will do one no good just as members of the Jewish Haredi sects have never had their community’s powers enhanced anymore than anyone else’s.

    People may react by providing The Third Reich as an example of a failed attempt at such an endeavor but it failed in the Jewish issue because Adolf Hitler conflated native, Germanic Jews with immigrating Eastern European and Bolshevik Jews, who were in fact the problem in Germany after 1919. Had he made such a distinction, it would have been much harder for the world at large to make the fantastic claims that were made against The Third Reich.

    It has been demonstrated over many years with much evidence that people do not need religion to obtain a morel compass. What they need is fairness, honesty, and compassion and strength where necessary.

    If the society in the United States could actually revitalize the concept of a separation of church and state, thus disallowing religious arguments to invade the decisions and actions of others, especially in the courts, things may turn actually around…

    • Replies: @R2b
    , @anarchyst
    , @Emslander
  70. I appreciate your article, Mr. Joyce. I would note that Mel Gibson, who is so vilified as an anti-semite for some comments he uttered after the police busted him for drunk driving in LA, then made The Passion of The Christ, I guess, as a sort of penance for his sins. That movie, which I watched again recently, also focuses on the Romans as being the villains for the death of Jesus. It does, however, very interestingly, tweak things just a bit by having the Romans ask the Jewish leaders if they might want to let Jesus off the hook and being somewhat incredulous with the Jews lack of interest in that proposition. Nice try, Mel Gibson, but you can’t, it seems get off the hook quite so easily. The Jews have latched on to the “Jesus narrative” like a rabid dog and won’t let up even if the Christians acknowledge with one voice that the Jews had nothing to do with the murder. You should have heard the outrage in my family years ago when one of the Popes publicly forgave the Jews for killing Jesus. “Well we don’t forgive the Catholics!” , said one of my dear relatives. In summary, “scratch a gentile, find an anti-semite underneath.” But then again, we Jews never did subscribe to the idea of turning the other cheek, unless it was done to moon one of our adversaries.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  71. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @Arthur MacBride

    I came upon a compilation of transcripts of radio broadcasts of poet Ezra Pound from the 1940’s.

    Here’s part of one from April 30, 1942:

    “I naturally mistrust newspaper news from America. I grope in the mass of lies, knowing most of the sources are wholly UNtrustworthy. It nevertheless seems to transpire, or expire that there is a difference of opinion between quite a fair sized number of Americans, and an equally large number of Jews, Jews-playfellows, and the bedfellows of Jews and of Iewesses, from Eve Curie to Lehman, and Lippmann… SOMETIME the Anglo Saxon may AWAKE to the fact that the Jewish kahal and secret forces concentrated or brought to focus in the unappetizin’ carcass of Franklin D. Roosevelt do NOT shove Aryan or non-yittisch nations into WARS in order that those said nations may WIN wars. The non-Jew nations are shoved into wars in order to destroy themselves, to break up their structure, to destroy their social order, to destroy their populations. And no more flaming and flagrant case appears in history than our own American Civil War, said to be an occidental record for size of armies employed and only surpassed by the more recent triumphs of Warburgs, the wars of 1914 and the present one…”

    Leonard W Doob, ed. Ezra Pound Speaking: Radio Speeches of World War II (Westport, CT: Greenwood), p. 113

    • Thanks: Robjil, Arthur MacBride
  72. R2b says:
    @Steve Naidamast

    You know, the simple answer to that, is that Christianity has been infiltrated by Judaism.

    That is why the West is weak.

    We lack our Religion.

    And our religion was Christian.

    1 Thess. 2:5, must be boldly preached.

    We are back to Norse-cut hair, with defense leagues and churches, bowing to Talmudic lies.

    They are NOT our elder Brothers.

    They are heathen par preference!

    As was their ally Adolph Hillel.

  73. Realist says:
    @RoatanBill

    Our problems today stem from the completely non productive in the society.

    Absolutely correct. These non-productive people, for the most part, live in large cities. The apex group in large cities is the financial organizations…the wealthiest of the wealthy…this is over dominated by Jews.
    In the past large cities had a respectable manufacturing sector…that was decades ago. If large cities were isolated from essential products they would die in short order…they have no capability of self-sustenance.

  74. Rogue says:
    @Dian 'the AA Mathemagcian' Abbot

    Yoo wot?

    You talking about the Blacks, Bisequals and Cweer channel?

    I’ve always found the BBC to be the paragons of integrity and virtue – especially when covering up pedophile abuses.

    Makes me believe all their other stuff regarding race, sexuality, “history” and the benefits of immigration, amongst other things…

  75. anarchyst says:
    @Gina Schrank

    It turns out Mel Gibson was right.
    Alcohol has the nasty habit of reducing or eliminating inhibitions, allowing the TRUTH to manifest itself.
    Mel Gibson told the TRUTH and paid the price.
    On can easily see where Mel Gibson’s “old-line Roman Catholicism” came from, his father, Hutton Gibson is an old-line pre-Vatican II Catholic who DOES blame the jews for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ.
    Despite having no support from the Hollywood types, Mel Gibson’s “Passion of the Christ” was a film that no one could ignore.
    Gibson did make one concession to the jews, with the statement “may his blood be upon us and that of our descendants” spoken in Aramaic, not English.

  76. Good News!

    TRIPLE 9 (2016) directed by John Hillcoat is a cops & bang-bang movie set in Atlanta. The principal villains are relocated Russian Jew gangsters. (I myself prefer to restrict the term “Mafia” for Italians only.) The marks of Jew I.D. are constant: beanies, Davy stars, kosher logos on trucks, etc. The key of the plot: The Jewsters have spirited away to Israel (!) the young son of a local colored gang leader in order to force him to raid a heavily fortified Federal facility in order to retrieve certain documents which the boss Jewess will then use to motivate Putin’s boys back in Russia to release her imprisoned BF to Israel. Then the ‘Family will be together again’.

    The smooth continuity of the film’s identification of the Jewsters is absolutely jaw-dropping. Heretofore all the Bad Guys on the Big Screen (or online diminutives thereof) have been Italian, Irish, white, colored, German (of course), red skins, spics, slopes or other NAG [Normal, Alias “Gentile”] varieties. Now comes the Jews’ turn to wear the black beanie and the American scenes depicted look very familiar, the only startling thing being to see the Jews called by their right name.

    One might think that, given the notorious dominance of Synagogue Hollywood and even more so the bloody record of the _kidon_ [Jew assassins] such as Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, Huey Long, Lord Moyne, Graf Folke Bernadotte, the Three Kennedys, Olof Palme, Princess Diana, Gary Webb, Michael Hastings and multitudes more –one might think, I say, that revolutionary director John Hillcoat would give off the panic sense of a nigger prisoner fresh escaped from Parchman, holding a video camera and running fast through the marsh pursued by hounds and splashing guards. But no. Director Hillcoat holds a calm & steady lens. By his placid demeanor he mizewell be shooting just another common wicked wop story. We wish him well and “Watch your 6!”

    The film grossed $25 million against its $20 million production budget. Praise Dawg! A man to watch, this Aussie Hamiltonian.

    Critic Alonso Duralde of TheWrap called our subject “a cop movie that’s not just dumb, it’s disastrous.” Well, millionairess Jewess Sharon Waxman owns TheWrap [At a dinner party hosted by Israel’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Waxman met her future husband, a French businessman named Claude Memmi] so maybe faggot Duralde was playing it smart in his little way to pan pure gold as iron pyrite. Clink, clink and all that, eh what?

    Given the cultural importance of TRIPLE 9 I would fain encourage our generous host Ron Unz to put this comment or some informative variation thereof on his REVIEW’s main page. Whaddaya, whaddaya? Now can I say “Must See!”?

  77. Realist says:

    Initially established in 1913 to manage fallout from the conviction of Jewish murderer Leo Frank, the ADL’s first major effort to engage in cultural censorship began in the early 1920s in the form of a campaign against Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent essay series “The International Jew.”

    Henry Ford was an example of a gentile that had attributes that many Jews lack: Integrity, Ingenuity, and industriousness.

  78. anarchyst says:
    @Steve Naidamast

    I can remember when those jews who touted “separation of church and state” pushed their agenda to the extreme–instituting lawsuits against municipalities who chose to allow Christmas displays on public property. The lawsuits were numerous, from big-city displays to small towns-public displays of Christianity were outlawed.
    It’s turned full-circle. Christmas displays are still prohibited on public property while jewish menorahs are cropping up all over the place. Hell, even the White House proudly publicly displayed a jewish menorah.
    Jews no longer couch their hatred of Christianity in legal terms, but are overtly brash and confident in their hatred of Christianity.
    It is interesting to note that every jewish holiday is a celebration of genocide, jewish supremacy or screwing goyim out possessions, land or even life.
    It is long overdue for ((them)) to be kicked out of country 110…

  79. All you need to know abut the true power of god;

  80. pep says:

    The Ugly Truth About the Anti-Defamation League

    Supermob

  81. Information of Jewish control, and subversion of the Christian west just keeps coming, overflowing into public spaces, and hopefully seeping into the consciousness of the majority. Book after book, article after article, podcasts, videos, all tell the same story: we are just the current generation, just the latest generation, to be abused by jews. Someday the pot will boil over. What happens next is just speculation.

  82. @Arthur MacBride

    Wilson was being blackmailed by the Jews so he gave away the most important piece of control to save himself. It was cleverly accomplished and signed off when nearly all of Congress were at home for Christmas. Wilson later claimed he deeply regretted it. Benjamin Freedman explains what happened that December of 1913 … and subsequently after that like the birth of the IRS and income taxes. Also how the US got into the 1st World War. All the American men (as well as many thousands of other nation’s men and civilians) who died or were maimed did so because of these Jews. Oh yeah … it was the Jews who got Wilson elected in the first place.

  83. aj54 says:
    @GomezAdddams

    With the risk of speaking generally, most Jews study and know more of the Kabbala and Talmud than they do of the Torah. Many of their beliefs, especially the mystical and magical, would be quite foreign to Christians who have studied the Old Testament.

  84. Agent76 says:

    Jul 13, 2012 The Revolution of 1913 | by Thomas J. DiLorenzo

    Jan 23, 2012 Why the Constitution Had to Be Destroyed | Thomas J. DiLorenzo

    Archived from the live Misestv broadcast, this lecture was presented by Tom DiLorenzo at the Mises Circle in Houston on 14 January 2012.

  85. Thomasina says:
    @Anonymous

    “It is always embarrassing to hear conservatives put faith in a totally rigged judicial system. “If we only had good legal representation!” Seriously? Are they really that naive??”

    Or maybe you’re just afraid? For all we know, you could be legal counsel for the SPLC or ADL. I say sue the pants off of every single media outlet that defames a person’s character before getting the facts (as in the Nick Sandmann lawsuit against the Washington Post and CNN, which by the way was successful). Hit them hard.

    How do you expose corruption if you don’t go after them? When the rigged election was called into question, what exposed the corruption was the fact that they didn’t allow transparency, plus the fact that the court wouldn’t hear the case. It doesn’t really matter if you’re successful in court IF you are successful in exposing corruption.

    What’s your plan? Unless you’ve got something better, then I say you’re batting for the other side. Give us your best advice.

  86. aj54 says:
    @Titus Jerusalem Smasher

    The Jews were going withdraw all his bank credit, which would have closed down his production, payroll and supply lines, they were going to ruin him financially. People might be a little more sensitive to how efficacious that would be in the era of covid.

  87. I was annoyed when Nigerian Idris Elba was cast as Heimdall.

    Had all the good gods also been cast as black and all the bad ones as white, I would have been offended.

    Were the story of Thor (and Ragnarok), one used for a thousand years to justify the murder of people like me, I would infer a bigoted agenda from those castings.

  88. pep says:

    I forgot to include this gem in my last post.

    Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon – Arnon Milchan

  89. Codreanu says: • Website
    @GomezAdddams

    Really, isn’t it time for Aryans to seriously begin agitating for a renewed holocaust? A thoroughgoing one to end the existence of this odious tribe?

    • Replies: @Niebelheim
  90. @Thomasina

    Hah, lawyers… They are either on board with wokedom or too terrified to take a stand. I’m in year three of a lawsuit against the SPLC that I’ve had to fight pro se, since there were literally no attorneys in the Kansas City area willing to represent someone the SPLC had compared to Craig Cobb–the guy who tried to start a whites-only colony in North Dakota. As one criminal defense lawyer who was sympathetic to my case told me, “I represent the worst of the worst–child-killers, murderers, you name it–and no one bats an eye. But if took your case, it would be the end of my career.”

    Unless we get over this terror of being called names, we’re cooked, because they will call names. One thing everyone should always do is publicly come to the defense of anyone under a name-calling attack by the SPLC, et al.

    • Thanks: geokat62, Thomasina
  91. lydia says:

    Chapter 10: Ezra Explains Name Changes
    who lived in villages as far as Gaza…who lived in villages as far as Gaza.… only in Gaza… a Philistine city in Gaza
    https://godskingdom.org/studies/books/deuteronomy-the-second-law-speech-1/chapter-10-ezra-explains-name-changes

    Chapter 11: God’s Plan for Locusts
    d destroy the produce of the earth as far as Gaza
    https://godskingdom.org/studies/books/deuteronomy-the-second-law-speech-8/chapter-11-gods-plan-for-locusts

    Chapter 11
    The Rise of Jewish Terrorism
    In 1936 the mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, called for a general strike among the Arabs. They vowed to close down the economy, but only succeeded in vacating jobs that were quickly filled by new Jewish immigrants, who were in need of employment. Enraged by the failure of the strike, they turned to more violent measures, and Palestine exploded in violence once again. The mufti was short on wisdom and long on hatred.

    Vladimir Jabotinsky: Father of Jewish Terrorism
    By the mid-1930’s the situation was ripe for the next level of violence. The perfect man for the job was a man named Ze’ev Vladimir Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky had been the first commander of the Haganah, the Jewish defense organization founded in 1919 by the World Zionist Organization. In 1923 he founded Betar, named after the fortress where Bar Kokba made his last stand in his revolt against Rome in 135 A.D. Bar Kokba’s messianic revolt was the reason Rome banned all Jews from setting foot in Jerusalem. Bar Kokba, a false messiah, was Jabotinsky’s role model and the hero of all the Jewish terrorists in the 1940’s.

  92. @Codreanu

    “Renewed” presupposes a predecessor. Was there? And regardless, why feed a persecution complex? You can’t win that way; hasn’t history shown you? Rather, break the spell simply by seeing the illusion it all is. From Act 2 of Parsifal –

    With this sign I banish all your magic; as the spear closes the wound which you dealt with it, in wrack and ruin it destroys your deceptive display!

  93. @Arthur MacBride

    Wasn’t it the “conservative” Wilson who even signed over control of America’s money to them, no dispute, no quibble, just gave it to them ?

    Amazing.
    Except that it’s true, it would be unbelievable.

    One thing that the Jews have learned about Goyim over the centuries that is an undeniable truth: as much as the Goyim fulminate about Jews being “all about the money,” EVERY Goy (at least those in any position of power or influence) has a price at which he can be bought with Jew money. If that were not true, Jews would not currently own the Western World, lock, stock, and barrel.

  94. I have always been a fan of Kevin James.

    Oh,I thought we were doing King of Queens. Sorry.

  95. Emslander says:
    @Steve Naidamast

    When being part of a cult, you must be a believer and as such many Christians believe the fairy tales regarding Jesus Christ as much as they believe the fairy tales of the Old Testament that regale the Jews as the Chosen People and that their homeland is in Israel.

    And you believe the fairy tales of government science. Pity you!

  96. Hans says:
    @R2b

    LOL, R2. I kinda thought so, but always appreciate a nice opening!

    “For a millennium following Christ, Christians mistakenly believed that Jews were just people of the Old Testament who had rejected and murdered their Messiah. That bubble of innocence burst when sincere converts from Judaism revealed the foundational teachings of Judaism. Those shocking revelations—the non-human status of Gentiles, genocidal and other imprecations against Christians, blasphemies, perversions, and megalomaniacal presumptions—warranted confirmation. Due to the revelations of sincere converts such as Nicholas Donin, St. Vincent Ferrer, Jerónimo de Santa Fe, Johannes (Josef) Pfefferkorn, et al., further investigations were ordered, including the Disputations of Paris (1240 A.D.) and Tortosa (1413-1414 A.D.). Having no serious defense against the substantiated accusations, the rabbis involved slinked away humiliated.”

    “You are invited to examine the usual hasbara excuses about the Disputations in Jewish-owned Wikipedia and elsewhere, but suffice it to say that the rabbis have spent the centuries since the Disputations contriving a defense, but not an honest defense, only denial and concealment.”

    “In the centuries since the Disputations, the rabbis have invested much effort in sanitizing and expurgating vernacular translations of the Talmud. When confronted with the evidence, the Jews have tried many tricks to explain away and conceal their supremacist, genocidal, perverse, and blasphemous creed. These sanitized editions are useful to the rabbis: ‘See it’s not there.’ Or ‘The tractate is about ‘Balaam.’ In the sanitized Talmud editions numerous code word substitutions are used for Christians (min, Cuthean, Egyptian, Epicurean, etc.) and Jesus of Nazareth (‘that man,’ ‘the carpenter,’ ‘Balaam,’ ‘ben Pandera,’ a reference to the Talmud’s teaching that Jesus was the bastard of a whore who committed adultery with a Roman soldier named Pandera, and even blank spaces).”

    “The rabbis’ ignominious ‘Torah’ (Torah SheBeal Peh) teaches that Jesus was conceived adulterously in niddah (menstrual filth) by a Roman soldier named Pandera (Kallah 51a) of a whore (Sanhedrin 106a), so He is a mamzer (bastard) and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions of the Talmud, semen because he is accused of sexual perversion. (Gittin 57a).”

    “The rabbis boast of responsibility for Jesus’ Crucifixion, ‘hanged,’ even though the Romans were ‘inclined toward acquittal’ of Jesus (Sanhedrin 43a); therefore Jewish denial and blame-shifting to the Romans is a lie. The infamous Toledoth Yeschu, Maimonides’ Hilkoth Akun V, 3 and Letter to Yemen), and the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia (page 170), all boast of Jewish responsibility for Christ’s death. The Talmud notes that Jesus deserved four more deaths. The rabbis argue that Jesus should have been strangled while immersed in dung (Sanhedrin 52a). The rabbis insist that Jesus Himself was an idolater (Sanhedrin 43a, 107b) who worshipped a brick (Sanhedrin 67a, 107b), so Jesus was justly executed.”

    https://judaism.is/jesus-in-the-talmud.html

  97. TGD says:
    @Alden

    Gibson’s movie emphasized the horrors of torture and being crucified. It’s a horrible, humiliating and long lasting death.

    Gibson based his movie on the visions of a German nun or canoness by the name of Anne Catherine Emmerich who claimed to have been transported back to Roman Palestine where she witnessed the crucifixion. These visions were written down by Clemens Brentano. So Gibson’s movie is not based on the Gospel stories but on the ravings of a bedridden nun.

  98. anon[322] • Disclaimer says:

    Has Gibson’s The Passion ever been aired during Easter?

  99. Hans says:
    @TGD

    LOL, TGD, thanks for translating that yiddish gem (“So Gibson’s movie is not based on the Gospel stories but on the ravings of a bedridden nun”). I’ll provide the original:

    אַזוי גיבסאָן ס פֿילם איז ניט באזירט אויף די בשורה מעשיות אבער אויף דער ראַווינגס פון אַ בעדרידאַן מאָנאַשקע

    • Replies: @anon
  100. anon[322] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hans

    Mel Gibson’s, “The Passion of The Christ”, the greatest work of film.

    אַזוי גיבסאָן ס פֿילם איז ניט באזירט אויף די בשורה מעשיות אבער אויף דער ראַווינגס פון אַ בעדרידאַן מאָנאַשקע

    -Greek? Aramaic?

    ravings of a bedridden nun

    Raving of a Yid?

    Scourging and Crucifixion In Roman Tradition

    https://www.cbcg.org/scourging-crucifixion.html

    https://www.jesus-story.net/scourging/

    https://www.beliefnet.com/faiths/christianity/2004/03/the-passion-whats-not-in-the-bible.aspx

    The Shroud of Turin confirms the severity of the scourging.

    • Replies: @TGD
  101. @Alden

    Federal Rrserve yes Wilson did sign the law. But congress passed it. Had Wilson vetoed it, Aldrich and the rest would just have introduced and passed the bill again and again till Wilson or successor signed it.

    Wasn’t it a voice vote? We should have been able to know who voted for it. The USA was doomed from that moment.

  102. lydia says:

    Andrew Joyce writes very well on the dignity of Jesus and the frightening hate of the Gog/Ashkenazis
    God’s Kingdom dot net writes well about the fake jews and their attempt to steal the birthright of Jesus and the true King of kings — the remnant of the Jews will be saved when they see Jesus come i his glory and acknowledge Him as their rightful King. The deceiver antichrist will pretend to be Jesus and the suffering he will cause is seen by the state of the world from the system of the antichrist, all human governments without God’s true law not the sabbatean inversion which leads to the horror we see everyday. Jesus is coming soon if you read the signs of the time listed in Matthew 24, now is the time to be trimming our wicks and making sure we have enough extra oil for our lamps to go out and greet the Bridegroom.

    https://consortiumnews.com/2021/05/25/gaza-assault-left-400000-without-regular-access-to-clean-water/

    ISRAEL, PALESTINE
    Gaza Assault Left 400,000 Without Regular Access to Clean Water
    May 25, 2021

    “We stay up all night looking for water to fill plastic buckets,” said one mother in northern Gaza.

  103. TGD says:
    @anon

    The Shroud of Turin confirms the severity of the scourging.

    The shroud is an elaborate medieval hoax. You can argue about its authenticity ad infinitum but radio carbon dating determined its origin as being between 1260 and 1390 C.E.

    Most importantly, Jesus of Nazareth did not have long hair. Neither Jew, nor Roman nor Greek sported long hair at that time. Men’s hair was long during the renaissance during which time that “artifact” was made.

    The real Jesus may have looked something like below. And why does it matter anyway?

    • Replies: @Hans
    , @anon
    , @PaganDeusVult
  104. Hans says:
    @TGD

    LOL, TGD! Takes me back to “college” listening to some negro, Stokely Floyd, explaining what Jesus looked like. Just before or after Prof. (((Wald))) explained that we would all be wiped out by nukes. Great stuff, but are you positive it ain’t the Jew of Malta? LMAO.

  105. anon[500] • Disclaimer says:
    @TGD

    The repair fibres are approx 13th c.

    The Shroud from time of Christ
    since the Shroud is the Shroud of Christ.

    Update your Yid mind.

    And why does it matter anyway?

    You and the Yid collective would have to answer
    why so much effort into claiming rubbish as truth
    and a demeaning cartoon pic that depicts Yid not Christ.

  106. Liza says:
    @TGD

    Thanks for your input. Now I’m REALLY confused. When I read Criterion’s description “—part Gospel, part Technicolor epic”, I too scratched my head, but I thought, maybe they meant “in the style of” all those technicolor epics of the 50s.

    In any case, Criterion should know better.

    Glad you gave the info on the 1961 version. Generally speaking, I am not a big fan of early B&W unless it’s Keaton or Harold Lloyd.

  107. @Joe Paluka

    They were aware (because they were pushing it) that Biblical literacy was going to decline. At one time the family Bible or the Sunday sermon was the only game in town. Now the mass media (paperbacks, 78s, radio, TV, etc.) are successful competitors.

    Neville Goddard, the mid-century Positive Thinking lecturer of whom I’ve written frequently at Counter-Currents, is an interesting case. He himself read the Bible constantly, claiming to have learned his cabalistic interpretation of it from a “black, Ethiopian rabbi” named Abdullah in NYC.

    More to the point, he assumed Biblical literacy on the part of his audiences, so that they would “get” what he was saying. He would frequently say things like “I’m sure everyone here agrees that with God all things are possible” etc.

    Today, hardly anyone outside Appalachian has that kind of Biblical literacy. So yes, what people see on a movie screen or TV screen what they accept as reality or history. As Russian dissidents used to say, the US has a “free press” because no one bothers to read anymore.

  108. @TGD

    ” long lasting death.”

    I assume you mean a long lasting dying process; most people’s deaths are long lasting. (I like Mickey Spillane’s novella A Long Time Dead).

    Anyway, one of several clues that Jesus did NOT die on the cross, is that (because it’s a made up story designed to fit into prophecies and numerical codes) he dies in 3 hours, while crucifixion, as you say, was actually a long process. That’s why Pilate is “surprised” when Joseph of Arimathea asks for the body. That’s why the guards want to break his legs (victims would brace themselves to keep breathing; suffocation is the ultimate cause of death) but are again, surprised to find him dead. Etc.

    BTW Joseph of A. is described as a “rich man” because a common motif in Hellenistic novels is a rich person prematurely buried; being rich, tomb robbers break in to loot the tomb, and find the “corpse” is awake; they run away claiming to have seen a dead person arise. Sound familiar?

    • Replies: @bjondo
  109. @TGD

    Surely no one expects a Catholic to base his beliefs on the Bible!?

    • Disagree: Hibernian
  110. Gg Mo says:
    @Hans

    St. Paul-esque ? In Christ,

  111. Malla says:
    @Niebelheim

    I remember reading somewhere that in some Hollywierd Holohoax movies, the “evul Nazis” are played by Jews using their sinister looks while the Jewish “victims” are played by Aryans because of their angelic looks.

  112. Technicolor was first used in 1916. A number of movies in the 1920s were partly in color. It was a very expensive process.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor

    In Demille’s “The King of Kings,” the opening scene and the Resurrection scene were filmed in two-tone Technicolor.

    • Thanks: Liza
  113. A jewess named Alisa Rosenbaum met her Catholic husband on the set of Demille’s “The King of Kings.” Both were extras in the film.

    She later took the pen name “Ayn Rand” and wrote _The Virtue of Selfishness_, _Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal_, etc.

    In later years, it pleased her to claim that she also flirted with H.B. Warner and that he responded favorably to her flirting. No wonder Warner had a drinking problem.

    • Replies: @Blissex
  114. @GomezAdddams

    What you say is very interesting, but I don’t think you are right that ‘Judeo’ and ‘Christian’ are mutually exclusive. I used to think that, but I’m not so sure any more.

    • Replies: @Blissex
  115. Fr. John says:
    @Ktulu

    Go to hell, Blasphemer.

    There. That’s how you talk to a Jew, because only (((they))) would be so antichrist.

    Ever watch Rev. Steven Anders, KTULU? You’re in his sermon.

  116. @TGD

    Jesus is the White pagan God of antijudaism. The Bible is a Jew pamplet to try to Judaism our White Masculine God Jesus. Don’t let them!

  117. Blissex says:
    @Leo Den

    «DeMille was confused. Today’s converted Jews are NOT the Israelites of the bible»

    All those people who hallucinate about the “jewish race” (including many jews) indeed suffer from the same confusion: the jews became extinct long, long ago, because of intermarriage and conversion; “The Jews” are today no more a race than “The Romans”. Even if there must be a few “jews” today that are matrilineally descended from the israelites, but matrilineal descent cannot define a “race”. Consider the “race” of the “jews” of Ethiopia or China or those of Kerala/TamilNadu. Today the race of the vast majority of “jews” is “aryan white” if one believes in racialism.

    Note: I may believe that there are small isolated groups with a closer affinity to the israelites than most, but I can think only of the tiny Samaritan and Yemeni communities as candidates.

  118. Blissex says:
    @David Griffith

    «A jewess named Alisa Rosenbaum met her Catholic husband on the set of Demille’s “The King of Kings.” Both were extras in the film. She later took the pen name “Ayn Rand”»

    That is a really amuying coincidence. It is what happens in California. As another californian coincidence, Paul Schrade, a labor union guy who was wounded when Bob Kennedy was killed, had as neighbours Jerry Brown on one side and Timothy Leary on the other in Laurel Canyon.

  119. Blissex says:
    @Psychotic Break

    «I don’t think you are right that ‘Judeo’ and ‘Christian’ are mutually exclusive. I used to think that, but I’m not so sure any more.»

    Original “nazarenes”, the Jerusalem community and patriarchate, was one of of many judean sects, and Yeshua bin Yussuf was for the Pharisees one of the many insignificant sect founders who threatened their religious and temporal power; many such sect founders were eliminated, it was one of many cases of judean elites eliminating judean “troublemakers”. Then according to many Paul of Tarsus “hellenized” that judean sect, and it enjoyed a modest popularity across the hellenistic world, so it survived the suppression of Jerusalem and its “nazarene” patriarchate and much else by Emperor Titus. After a few hundred years of modest diffusion it was catapulted into the state religion by Constantine apparently because of a dream.

    In all this it retained its core, which was indeed revolutionary to traditional judaism and the Pharisees were right to feel threatened: a new covenant, where instead of men sacrificing something or someone else to bribe their deity, their deity performed self-sacrifice, once and for all, to forgive and redeem the inherited and collective “original sin” of humanity, as the deity changed the base of their relationship with humanity to reciprocal love rather than bribery.

    That “the jews” have been blamed for centuries for the inherited guilt of killing Jeshua ben Yussuf is not just historically ridiculous, but a monstrous betrayal of that new covenant, because even if today’s “jews” were the descendants of the long extinct “israelites”, the idea of collective and inherited guilt was part of the old covenant, and the point of the self-sacrifice of the deity was a new covenant eliminating the very idea of collective or inherited guilt, replacing it with one based on individual deeds inspired by love for the deity.

    • Replies: @Blissex
    , @bjondo
  120. Blissex says:
    @Blissex

    «the point of the self-sacrifice of the deity was a new covenant eliminating the very idea of collective or inherited guilt, replacing it with one based on individual deeds inspired by love for the deity. »

    As to that I realize that I should make more explicit my point: as to “judeo-christian”, historically the “nazarenes” were a judean sect, and the israelites of the Jerusalem patriarchate continued to go to the temple, as Yeshua himself had, and to observe most judean traditions, as Yeshua himself had, but they understood that the new covenant did override the old covenant in the relevant areas. So the new religion was both in part a continuation of judaism and in part a completely new theology.

    My suspicion that the early Jerusalem “nazarenes” did not realize just how drastically new that theology was, and the judean elites did realize that: the critical aspect was that in the new covenant there was essentially no role for an elite “rabbinate” and priesthood, as authorities on the religion and conveyors of the bribes of the faithful to the deity. Ironically the pauline version of christianity reintroduced the priests and bishops as mediator with the deity in another way, as the exclusive performers of the recollection of the self-sacrifice of their deity.

  121. bjondo says:
    @James J O'Meara

    You get scourged to the extent that Jesus did
    let’s see how long you live … on a bed of roses.

  122. bjondo says:
    @Blissex

    even if today’s “jews” were the descendants of the long extinct “israelites

    Wouldn’t Yid be Judaite and Torah/Talmud not Israelite?
    Judaites were the animal, human sacrificers, killers, monsters,
    spawn of Satan that Jesus came against.
    Israelites wanted nothing to do with the barbaric Judaites.

    God of love and forgiveness vs god of murder and blood.

    The two are opposites.
    One is against the other not following in line.

    We continue to live with the evil.

    Yid speak, act as descendants of the original murderers.
    Yid collective by their words that inherited guilt is deserved.
    I don’t know of any Christians thinking this way.

    One little Sarah Silverman, if she could, would murder again.

    • Replies: @aj54
  123. Andrew Joyce: “What is truth if it can’t be spoken?”

    And what is truth if spoken, but ignored? The truth is that Jews preferred their own race and their own ways to Christian universalism. The mystery is why whites did the opposite, and chose to worship a Jew as God.

    • Replies: @Naalsio
  124. Naalsio says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Yet isn’t universalism declared in nature itself? Basic math is from Egypt and Iraq, gunpowder is from China, many foods are from the New World, music often uses African rhythms with Beethoven’s Germanic backbeat and all sorts of languages, textiles are often from South America or Egypt, wine was invented in Iran, dogs were bred by the Romans, cats were bred by the Egyptians, laws were invented by the Vikings, modern warfare techniques were invented by the American Indians… Life is better with certain types of universalism.

  125. Anonymous[407] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    You translated the word “Goyim” as “Gentiles”. But that is not what it means.

    Sure, the word Goyim implies Gentiles or non-jews, but an accurate translation should be “slave”, or perhaps “cattle”, or even “Two-legged beasts of burden”.

    It is important to realise that jews do not even see Gentiles as human.
    We are only animals, slaves, our one and only purpose is to SERVE JEWS.

    And yet, they have the chutzpah to call us racists?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  126. geokat62 says:
    @Anonymous

    You translated the word “Goyim” as “Gentiles”. But that is not what it means.

    I’ve always been intrigued by the definition of this word. It has been a bit of a riddle wrapped in an enigma. The standard storyline is that it means “the nations.” But how could such a definition possibly be interpreted as being derogatory, as most standard dictionaries suggest?

    For example, Merriam-Webster’s definition:

    Definition of goy
    sometimes disparaging

    History and Etymology for goy
    Yiddish, from Hebrew gōy people, nation

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goyim

    After doing some lengthy digging, I can across the following two different sources:

    As the Jews considered all of the non-Jewish nations in biblical times as polytheistic and idolatrous, the Hebrew word goy has for some time acquired the meaning “heathen”.

    https://www.askdifference.com/goyim-vs-goyem/

    As the non-Israelite and the nokri were “heathens,” “goi” came to denote a “heathen,”

    https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6841-goy

    I think these latter definitions of goyim (meaning “heathen”) are probably more accurate than “the nations.”

    • Replies: @aj54
  127. @anarchyst

    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.

    True, Schofield was a reprobate charlatan, but he got his ideas from John Darby, the inventor of Dispensationalism and the impending “Rapture” of the Church. This, of course, doesn’t absolve Schofield in the least — or Ryrie, for that matter, for continuing the lie in his study Bible — but I was completely unaware that Vatican II is what caused the Catholics to embrace the Jews as “elder brothers”. Good information, thanks!

    You’re right, too, in that Evangelical Christianity MUST get over its love affair with Jews and Judaism. I find it disgraceful, and a form of denial, that in every Christian reenactment of Jesus’ Crucifixion on Good Friday, the Jews are NEVER quoted as saying, “His [Jesus’] blood shall be on us and on our children!” No, no, no! It’s all about ‘evil’ Pilate and the Roman soldiers — in their very cool uniforms, by the way — executing Him, not the Jews murdering Him. Evangelicalism needs to grow up, but maybe… it is.

  128. The problem is that most Americans do not know the power of the Jews. Another problem is Evangelical Christianity that preaches Israel can do no wrong.

  129. aj54 says:
    @Anon

    the Good Lord only changes one heart at a time. There is a strong movement of Messianic Judaism in Israel today, despite the ongoing threats to their safety and lies told about them. The Talmud was not fully written in the time of Christ, but the teachings and attitudes were all there; they are seemingly unchanged today. He despised their errors because they substituted the doctrines of men for the written Word of God in the Scriptures. We are cautioned to not be too full of ourselves, as we are only the wild olive trees grafted into the root. And we did not save ourselves. Faith, like salvation, is a gift. Unearned. Unearnable.

  130. aj54 says:
    @geokat62

    actually, they are all correct according to Strong’s Concordance:
    גֹּי גּוֹי

    gôy gôy

    go’ee, go’-ee

    Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

  131. aj54 says:
    @bjondo

    Jesus/Yeshua said He came only for the lost sheep of Israel. What did He mean by this? The land of Israel was composed of the northern and southern kingdoms. The Kingdom of Israel in the north is where the 10 ‘lost’ tribes lived. The south held the Kingdom of Judea, comprised of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and some of the Levites. The north fell away from God and started worshipping pagan deities. They were invaded and defeated in battle and driven into exile and slavery; a perennial part of the history of the Levant. He wanted the remnant brought back to the true faith of their fathers, of worship of Jehovah alone, no pagan gods, no doctrines of men.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings